Channel
@savva_samarin
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
82subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001959382143 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @savva_samarin |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/savva_samarin |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 82 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:57 | 84 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 84 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 10 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
160 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 46 | 28.7% | |
| 🔥 | 39 | 24.4% | |
| ❤ | 33 | 20.6% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 6.25% | |
| 🤯 | 8 | 5.00% | |
| 🤬 | 6 | 3.75% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 2.50% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 2.50% | |
| 🌭 | 3 | 1.88% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 1.88% | |
| 🤨 | 3 | 1.88% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.625% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 160 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 January 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @savva_samarin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 January 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Последние месяцы мы с командой работаем над нашим продуктом — Якобом, это тот персонаж, что выше) Сейчас мы активно улучшаем продукт, проверяем разные идеи, собираем обратную связь и постепенно делаем его сильнее. Параллельно подаёмся в различные программы и гранты, чтобы получить возможность развивать проект быстрее За это время он сильно изменился. Из транскрибации встреч и базы знаний превратился в мозг, который…
❤8
Придумали вот такого персонажа для нашего нового продукта в агентстве Какое имя бы вы ему дали?
❤7🔥4😁2
Победили!
🔥10❤6🤯2
Пока Claude со своим инструментарием пытается сменить Figma, там Спектр — российская платформа для дизайнеров пытается составить конкуренцию Figma, но есть нюанс)
👍4
Переключатель с бонусной карты ржд на обычный поиск. Не самый очевидный элемент, непонятно какой цвет соответствует активному состоянию и содержание внутри плашки не меняется
🤔4🤬4❤2
Считаю тема креативности не раскрыта и могу сказать, что креатив это не про вдохновение В реальности идеи не приходят сами — они собираются через опыт, референсы, быстрые скетчи, иттерации доработок. Но тут очень важно не залипнуть в один вариант. За час можно отработать один вариант, а можно накидать 10 слабых — и почти всегда второй подход даёт результат сильнее, т.к. есть выбор Если идея не идёт бессмысленно дав…
💯4❤3
На этой неделе много общался с разными ребятами про вайбкод и ИИ. Не планировал так глубоко в это уходить, но тема сейчас горящая, и у меня тоже. Конечно, общее впечатление у всех, нихера чё оно умеет, но я бы предложил немного приземлиться и найти в этом капельку негативного) Сейчас уже сам пересел на генерацию логики продукта через клод. Это реально ускоряет исследование и поиск решений. Бывает, что я генерю ТЗ и …
👍4❤2🔥2
Опубликовали наш первый кейс на премию Workspace Рассказали, как построили экосистему «Богатого курьера» для привлечения курьеров в Яндекс Доставку Мы в этот проект влюблены. Пошлите нам немного удачи🫶
🔥11
Баннер рекламирует командную строку
😁5👍2🔥2
Заботливый ВТБ думает, что мне всё таки интересно их предложение
😁7
А этот микротступ сверху для кого сделан, не пойму🤔
🤬2😁1
Вайбовая анимация загрузки приложения в Play Market от MUI 3 Ну что обладатели айфонов, а вы чем удивите?
😁3🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @savva_samarin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Савва Самарин” (@savva_samarin), 82 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/savva_samarin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.