🌟⭐️ До новых перемен осталось 50%
custom 540208993224206353718custom 540440209352612305718custom 540228782286022561217

Channel
@savinbooks
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
28subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003723684089 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @savinbooks |
| Description | По всем вопросам: @offsavin |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/savinbooks |
@savinbooks was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 28 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 28 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (13 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 885 |
| Reactions total | 879 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 06:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,024 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5402089932242063537 | 311 | 30.4% | |
| custom 5404402093526123057 | 295 | 28.8% | |
| custom 5402287822860225612 | 274 | 26.8% | |
| custom 5404501530608962340 | 144 | 14.1% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,024reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌟⭐️ До новых перемен осталось 50%
custom 540208993224206353718custom 540440209352612305718custom 540228782286022561217
🎞️ Сажусь читать «Безмолвный 🎞️ крик» давно ходил вокруг да около этой истории и решил, что время пришло познакомиться. ⭐️ Я в огромном предвкушении, ибо видел много положительных отзывов. А что читаете вы сейчас?
custom 540228782286022561222custom 540208993224206353720custom 540440209352612305720custom 54045015306089623407
☕️🌟🌟Всем привет, я тут немного пропал, всё потому что у меня начался отпуск! Пока меня тут не было, я успел прочитать «Сценарий», и я остался в восторге. 🌟 Поначалу мне было скучно читать, а потом как всё пошло. Сначала думаешь одно, а потом бац, а это не так. Концовка мне понравилась, было жалко каждого героя по-своему, конечно, но и в то же время и нет. Лично для меня автор раскрыл всех героев по-своему, конечно ж…
custom 540228782286022561226custom 540440209352612305724custom 540208993224206353722custom 54045015306089623402
🤩🤩Всех с последним месяцем лета! Начинаю месяц с книги «Сценарий», который мне выбрала моя Валя 🌟 🌟🌟//А вы что сейчас читаете? Показывайте в комментариях!
custom 540208993224206353725custom 540440209352612305724custom 540228782286022561223custom 54045015306089623403
🤩🤩🤩 Закончил читать «Зверь» Ане Риэль. #прочитанное— 5/10 🐦⬛️ Не хочу писать длинный отзыв на эту книгу! Что хочу сказать, мне было скучно, а местами непонятно, что вообще происходит, хах, странные пошлые мысли и моменты. Но это, конечно же, полбеды. Из всего мне понравилась концовка, она оставила послевкусие. Скажу сразу, что сама книга пропитана мрачностью, и не всем она, конечно же, зайдёт 🤩
custom 540208993224206353725custom 540440209352612305724custom 540450153060896234024custom 54022878228602256125
Нет книжного контента, но зато есть кошачий 😺🌟
custom 540228782286022561227custom 540208993224206353726custom 540440209352612305725custom 54045015306089623402
🌟🤩🤩Вышел первый постер и тизер-трейлер к сериалу — «Кэрри» по книге Стивена Кинга от режиссёра Майка Флэнагана. .✦ ݁˖ Премьера восьмисерийного сериала — 7 октября.
custom 540208993224206353725custom 540450153060896234024custom 540440209352612305721custom 54022878228602256126
#книжныепокупки | Новые книги на моих полках ˖ ࣪ . ࿐ Снова начал собирать серию «Вечные истории», ну не смог я долго не покупать ее 🌟🌟
custom 540440209352612305730custom 540208993224206353729custom 540228782286022561229custom 54045015306089623401
🌟🎣࿐ Самая нужная книжная покупка года, а именно трекеры по Стивену Кингу 🌟
custom 540208993224206353727custom 540450153060896234027custom 540228782286022561226custom 54044020935261230571
🐦⬛️❤️ Начинаю потихоньку читать «Зверь» Ане Риэль и пока не могу понять, что вообще происходит, хах, но интересно. 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Трогательная и вместе с тем жуткая история, которая поражает до глубины души. Роман о подлинной дружбе, предательстве, издевательствах и смерти; о мальчике с генетической мутацией, но одновременно и о каждом человеке — ведь на любого можно повесить клеймо «не такой, как все».…
custom 540450153060896234022custom 540208993224206353721custom 540440209352612305721custom 54022878228602256128
А я тем временем закончил читать «Отпустить 10-го» Хлоя Уолш 💔 #прочитанное — 8/10 Для меня эта самая сильная книга цикла на данный момент. 🌟🌟 Очень грустная история и ужасно депрессивная. В ней есть свои плюсы, но и также много минусов лично для меня. Очень жалко Лиззи, конечно, но все равно я не смог ее понять до конца, ее действия ближе к концу книги и также ее тупости. Да, у нее биполярное расстройство и много …
custom 540208993224206353723custom 540228782286022561223custom 540440209352612305723custom 54045015306089623408
#книжныепокупки | Новые книги на моих полках ˖ ࣪ . ࿐
custom 540440209352612305719custom 540208993224206353718custom 540228782286022561218
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @savinbooks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 98,984 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Странствующий Алекс | 18+” (@savinbooks), 28 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/savinbooks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.