Channel
@savelyeevaa
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
732subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001712701468 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @savelyeevaa |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/savelyeevaa |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:27 | 732 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 733 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 734 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:21 | 734 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 5 (20 June 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 634 |
| Reactions total | 131 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 02:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
218 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 93 | 42.7% | |
| 💔 | 50 | 22.9% | |
| custom 5321480860749305356 | 44 | 20.2% | |
| custom 5323793992695970329 | 20 | 9.17% | |
| custom 5323310632781516765 | 11 | 5.05% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 218reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
let’s unpack gold apple box ⭐️ не знаю, как у них это получается, но каждый раз я нахожусь в полном восторге от наполнения особенно нравится внимание к деталям и то, насколько идеально и красиво все подобрано 🫴🏼 p.s. бокс все еще есть в наличии. если давно присматривались, кажется, это знак!
❤21custom 532148086074930535619💔11
clean & short nails 💅 решила восстановить ногтевую пластину и пару месяцев походить без гель лака {сделала бондирование, тот самый эффект «голых ногтей»} выглядит очень дорого!
❤18custom 532379399269597032913custom 532148086074930535610
я часто вспоминаю историю нашего знакомства. она была такой случайной и тогда я даже не могла подумать, что эта встреча станет чем-то большим. мы такие разные, но так прекрасно дополняем друг друга. и так приятно, что это замечаем не только мы. я каждый день восхищаюсь тобой и я никогда не перестану это говорить, для меня ты пример во многом. я радуюсь и грущу вместе с тобой, и мне безумно приятно, что ты доверяешь…
❤18💔14custom 53233106327815167657
обожаю знакомиться с новыми бьюти-брендами! в одной из рассылок был найден легендарный кушон корейского бренда tirtir ♥️ теперь понимаю, почему он стал настоящим маст-хэвом: ровное покрытие, красивое сияние и эффект второй кожи >> я редко пользуюсь тональными основами, но попробовать что-то новое всегда интересно! кстати, найти бренд можно в зя а вы уже знакомы с tirtir?
💔15❤13custom 53237939926959703297
главное правило дружбы: никогда не пропускать фотобудки положить фотографии в сумочку, а потом находить их случайным образом лучшее чувство >>
❤23custom 532148086074930535615💔10custom 53233106327815167654
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @savelyeevaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SAVELYEVAA” (@savelyeevaa), 732 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/savelyeevaa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.