4 measurements spanning 4 days, net +283. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,288–6,655 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 06:07
6,613
+257
6 Aug 2026, 19:25
6,356
+26
6 Aug 2026, 03:21
6,330
no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:31
6,330
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
42.9%
avg views ÷ 6,613 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,830
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
13 (22 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
36,840
Reactions total
4,172
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 02:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
542
Videos
8
Links
59
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1,767 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5361744392442915830
798
45.2%
custom 5362066738328426405
509
28.8%
custom 5361928075309261240
350
19.8%
custom 5361552098167136782
100
5.66%
custom 5363820867396607492
10
0.566%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,172reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 13 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
20
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @savelevkst. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Фотографии со съёмок нового выпуска "Дел", где я вновь побывал ведущим📸
Компанию мне составили: Ахшар, который в представлении для аудитории «Дел» точно не нуждается, и коллега Никита Бубенников - знаком многим из вас по каналу Long Chik
А с кем бы вы хотели увидеть коллабу? Кого позвать гостем в следующий раз - пишите в комментарии👂
В новом выпуске «Дела» - история Цутому Миядзаки. Одно из самых громких и жутких дел в истории Японии.
Для меня лично это один из самых омерзительных серийных убийц. И дело даже не столько в кровожадных деталях, сколько в поведении после: письма с признаниями в убийствах, телефонные звонки измученным родителям, посылка с обугленными костями и детскими зубами.
Это какой-то отдельный, изощрённый уровень жестокости - …
А вот и контент подъехал
Вновь побывал обывал ведущим в шоу «Дела»
Обязательно посмотрите и обязательно поддержите меня в комментариях под видео
Как никак, а это лишь мой второй раз в роли ведущего и ваша поддержка нужна❤️
СМОТРЕТЬ
ПЕРЕХОДНЫЙ ВОЗРАСТ: МОЛОТОЧНИКИ - более 200 000 просмотров📺
Приятные новости с утра❤️
Спасибо всем за поддержку! Реально был удивлен, как сильно вы ждете следующий выпуск про норвежских блэк-металистов
После переезда приступлю к работе 🗾
Москва! Дима Позов, Ахшар Хох и Костя Савельев ждут вас 13го августа на true-crime вечере🖤
Это ближайшая дата, когда мы наконец сможем собраться все вместе — не стоит откладывать!
🎫 Билеты будут тут: https://delatruecrime.intickets.ru/seance/73691678
Про какое дело вы бы хотели услышать на концерте? Поделитесь в комментариях.
"Щас я быстренько смонтирую ролик" - говорил он😘
Как ранее писал, думал опубликую видео на выходных, но уж слишком увлекся
По итогу, из разговорного видео сейчас получается "документальный фильм" о том, как снимаются ролики, где я подробно разбираю как делался каждый выпуск. Там и визуальные приемы объясняю, и кадры со съёмок показываю
Понимаю, что такой формат не всем зайдет, но хочется подробно объяснить, почему…
Ребят, нужно ваше мнение 👀
После выхода ролика про дело молоточников мне в личку написал человек, который оказался близким другом Артёма Ануфриева - задолго до того, как всё началось.
Они играли в одной группе, тусовались, были частью одной компании. А потом их пути разошлись: Артём сблизился с Никитой Лыткиным и постепенно замкнулся в себе, а мой собеседник в это время вступил в дружину, которая патрулировала рай…
НОВЫЙ ПОСТ ДЛЯ ВОПРОСОВ
Недавно публиковал пост, где в комментариях можно было задать вопросы, на которые я отвечу в новом видео, но не уточнил одну важную вещь — и получил от некоторых ребят сразу по 10 развернутых вопросов подряд😅
Исправляюсь: один человек — один вопрос. Именно так это и будет работать в ролике — блиц формат.
Поэтому если вы уже писали несколько вопросов - выберите один, самый важный для вас. Ес…
БИТЦЕВСКИЙ МАНЬЯК - 300 000 просмотров
Радует тенденция на канале, что даже те ролики, которые показали себя на старте не лучшим образом, благодаря новым выпускам все равно собирают просмотры🗾
Так произошло и с выпуском про дело Пичушкина - после молоточников многие перешли посмотреть предыдущее видео
Готовлю большой ролик на несколько часов о том, как снимался первый сезон майндхантера🎥
Впервые подробно расскажу о том, как снимался каждый выпуск, покажу кадры со съемок и отвечу на самые часто задаваемые вопросы
Думаю, на следующей неделе опубликую!
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @savelevkst. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 122,044 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SAVELEV | САВЕЛЬЕВ” (@savelevkst), 6,613 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/savelevkst.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
