В VK сегодня выложила фотки эти старые… нет, ну что за красивая девушка, это вообще, ну 😮💨🤌🏼 сюда тоже хочу похвастать, вспомнить какую нежноту-ляпоту снимали! Фотосессию чтоли замутить в ближайшем будущем, а? 🤨
❤194custom 527838969438670609119😁7

Channel
@savekinaofficial
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,617subscribers
-27 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001323139451 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @savekinaofficial |
| Created | 23 June 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/savekinaofficial |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:12 | 7,617 | -17 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:41 | 7,634 | -10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:19 | 7,644 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 7,644 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 9 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (9 June 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 15,400 |
| Reactions total | 1,136 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,604 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,874 | 72.0% | |
| custom 5278389694386706091 | 511 | 19.6% | |
| 😁 | 79 | 3.03% | |
| 🌚 | 78 | 3.00% | |
| custom 5343864477949379781 | 62 | 2.38% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,604reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @savekinaofficial. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 June 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
В VK сегодня выложила фотки эти старые… нет, ну что за красивая девушка, это вообще, ну 😮💨🤌🏼 сюда тоже хочу похвастать, вспомнить какую нежноту-ляпоту снимали! Фотосессию чтоли замутить в ближайшем будущем, а? 🤨
❤194custom 527838969438670609119😁7
Была, кстати, на спорт-фесте и хотела там йогой позаниматься, мышцы кора, все дела… В итоге мои достижения это: ✅ прокачены навыки общения и договоренностей (надо было быстренько обкашлять вопросики ради детской печати, она нужна, чтобы получить подарки) ✅ получены те самые подарки! (в пакете были два детских шампуня помимо прочего, куда деться с такой радости не знаю) ✅ заметила рой шмелей, прям общагу шмелиную …
❤104custom 527838969438670609111😁5
Ну что, как вам тот факт, что щас последний месяц лета? У меня оно пролетело как дня 4 ☹️ Кто-то писал, что вроде только недавно с 30ти летним меня поздравляли, да, а еще новый год встречали будто на прошлой неделе. К слову, до нового года 4 месяца 😃
❤143custom 527838969438670609121😁15
С днём рождения меня 🤩 хехехе
❤312custom 527838969438670609156🌚23
Окей, поехали, что я думаю 😳 о купленном спустя... много времени спустя. ✨ спрей-фиксатор для лица мне понравилось, что он увлажняет, освежает и при этом нет ощущения забетонированного лица, то есть будто бы и не наносила спрей; что касается его прямого назначения - сохранение стойкости макияжа - я не поняла, лол, но будто бы работает! отзывы на него восторженные и скажу, что хуже он точно не сделает, а цена норм. …
❤73custom 527838969438670609120🌚8
А мы как-то обсудим, что я сейчас монтировала новое видео для лайф-тт и поняла, что я так и не выложила отзыв на те продукты, что были в последних на данный момент видео 🤝🤝. И ИЗ-ЗА ЭТОГО Я НЕ ВЕЛА ТГ КАНАЛ! ТИПО СНАЧАЛА ЭТОТ ПОСТ, а потом уже все остальное да? Сначала он, а потом Ариана Грандэ... 🤔
❤103😁12custom 527838969438670609110
Posted without readable text
❤60custom 527838969438670609117🌚10
В Москве похолодало чуть, так вайбово стало в кафешках сидеть работать 😙 будто осень, а для меня осень - это «новый год», время пахалова и новых целей (со школы наверно осталось 🙂↕️)
❤179custom 527838969438670609131🌚8
Предъявляем документики 🤫 ⛓️
custom 5278389694386706091256❤114😁40custom 534386447794937978110🌚6
🏡 KVARTIRNIK был вчера, а я на нем была получается
❤173custom 527838969438670609124custom 534386447794937978119🌚2
🤭 привет
❤334custom 527838969438670609137🌚21custom 534386447794937978115
🎞 Хоть бы больше Эйфорию не снимали! #кинорек Я досмотрела третий сезон Эйфории и вот что я думаю: Всем, кто только собирается смотреть этот нашумевший сериал и наслышаны, что это просто фиолетовая nark*мания в блесках - это не так. Если вы любитель красивой картинки, психологических портретов, загадок, токсичных киношных отношений - вам зайдет первый сезон. Про качество и стиль съемки я повторюсь еще раз, очень к…
❤85custom 534386447794937978118custom 52783896943867060919
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @savekinaofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 966,898 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Полина печатает…” (@savekinaofficial), 7,617 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/savekinaofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.