Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Громада Протасового яру

@save_protas

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,070subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001674502617
TypeChannel
Username@save_protas
Created4 July 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/save_protas

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

5,960 average views per post against 1,070 subscribers — an engagement rate of 556.9%. Across the 3,171 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,001–3,162 subscribers, posting mainly in Ukrainian — the middle half sit between 18.4% and 47.0%, with a median of 29.6%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (13 July 2026 12 August 2026)
Posts measured10 of 10 published in the window (7 exact, 3 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled59,589
Mature posts only556.9% over 10 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers1,070 measured 10 August 2026
Cohortb1000:ukr · 3,171 channels · p10 10.9% · p25 18.4% · p50 29.6% · p75 47.0% · p90 70.4%
Position in cohort99.653th percentile · 18.8× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.283% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageUkrainian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

1,0681,0701,0696 August 2026 — 1,068 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,068 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,070 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,068–1,070 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 14:511,070+2
7 Aug 2026, 08:301,068no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:321,068first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 29 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
556.9%
avg views ÷ 1,070 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,960
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.396%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held17 (29 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total59,589
Reactions total236
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 21:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

409 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
36288.5%
👍184.40%
💔163.91%
🙏71.71%
🫡30.733%
😢20.489%
🤔10.244%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 409reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC≈18,800 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🌿 Боротьба за 16 гектарів Протасового Яру триває Вчора Господарський суд міста Києва розглядав справу за позовом прокуратури про повернення 16 гектарів Протасового Яру громаді міста. Під час засідання представники ТОВ «Протасів Яр» (група компаній WOG) подали заяву про залишення позову без розгляду. Майже дві години суд з'ясовував обґрунтованість цієї заяви та заслуховував позиції учасників справи. 👩‍⚖️За результа

28

1 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC≈22,300 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Громадо, друзі! 4 серпня, 12:00. Господарський суд міста Києва, вул. Богдана Хмельницького, 44-Б. Суддя Васильченко Т.В., зал №13 (попередньо – зали мають звичку мігрувати, тож звіряйтесь зі списком на місці). На порядку денному не формальність, а позов прокуратури про повернення 16 гектарів Протасового Яру громаді міста. А отже це стосується кожного, хто досі вважає, що Протасів яр – це про дерева й людей, а не пр

28

26 Jul 2026, 19:25 UTC475 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Продовжується наше літо на Протасі🍀❤️ Вчора відбувся кінопоказ документальної стрічки режисерки Жанни Довгич «Мир для Ніни» — фільм про матір, життя якої зруйнувала війна. Для нас було честю присутність головної героїні фільму Ніни Костянтинівни Брановицької – мами Героя України Ігоря Брановицького, одного із останніх захисників Донецького аеропорту, що був закатований і страчений російськими найманцями у 2015 році

21🫡2

25 Jul 2026, 13:48 UTC417 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Нагадуємо! Сьогодні ввечері на галявині Протасу документальна стрічка «Мир для Ніни» — фільм про матір, життя якої зруйнувала війна. Ніна Костянтинівна Брановицька - мати, що шукає справедливості після того, як її сина, військового в полоні, вбиває російський найманець. Прагнучи розірвати коло насильства, що торкнулося її родини, Ніна намагається встановити правду та домогтися відповідальності винних. Її шлях показує

6👍1

22 Jul 2026, 12:10 UTC≈15,400 views80 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Енсо відступила. Але не здалася. 17 липня ТОВ «Холдингова компанія «Енсо груп» подала заяву про відмову від позову. Сьогодні, 22 липня, Верховний Суд цю заяву задовольнив. Що це означає - компанія припинила спроби оскаржити правовий статус заказника. Статус, за який ми боролися роками, залишається чинним. Чого це не означає - що від ідеї забудови Протасового Яру відмовилися. Відмова від одного позову – це не відмо

76👍3🤔1

21 Jul 2026, 09:38 UTC443 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Чи можливо знайти спокій після того, як війна забирає близьку людину? Відповідь на це питання дуже складне. Документальна стрічка «Мир для Ніни» — фільм про матір, життя якої зруйнувала війна. Ніна Костянтинівна Брановицька - мати, що шукає справедливості після того, як її сина, військового в полоні, вбиває російський найманець. Прагнучи розірвати коло насильства, що торкнулося її родини, Ніна намагається встановити

14😢2

19 Jul 2026, 16:16 UTC411 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026

⚖️ 22 липня Верховний Суд має розглянути справу щодо Протасового Яру по ділянці ЕНСО ГРУП. ТОВ «Холдингова Компанія «Енсо Груп» подала касаційну скаргу на постанову апеляції та першої інстанції, яким їм вже було відмовлено в позові. І тут 17 липня ТОВ «Холдингова Компанія «Енсо Груп» подало заяву про відмову від позову. На стадії перегляду у Верховному суді їх же скарги. Це означає, що компанія відмовилася від спроб

19

18 Jul 2026, 16:31 UTC442 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Громадо! В суботу 25 липня в 19.30 на галявині Протасового яру відбудеться другий в цьому році «Традиційний кінопоказ на Протасі», які разом з громадою започаткував Роман Ратушний. Ми покажемо документальну стрічку «Мир для Ніни» — документальний фільм про матір, життя якої зруйнувала війна. Її син Ігор Брановицький, один із останніх захисників Донецького аеропорту, був закатований і страчений російськими найманцям

12

8 Jul 2026, 18:32 UTC546 views34 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сьогоднішнє підготовче засідання за позовом прокуратури про повернення 16 гектарів громаді було зняте з розгляду через повітряну тривогу. Такі вже наші реалії - навіть суд зупиняється, коли лунає сигнал. Але справа нікуди не зникла, і ми продовжуємо. 🗓 Нова дата: 4 серпня 2026, 12:00 ⚖️ Господарський суд міста Києва 📍 вул. Богдана Хмельницького, 44-Б 👩‍ Суддя: Васильченко Т.В. Тримаємо руку на пульсі. Побачимося в

27🙏7

6 Jul 2026, 17:47 UTC583 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026

📢 Громада Протасу повертається до суду — і цього разу мова знов про 16 гектарів. Цими вихідними відбувся Фестиваль "Протасів Яр" памʼяті Романа Ратушного💚 Було багато людей, музики, розмов і відчуття, що Протасів Яр — це більше, ніж просто зелена зона. Це місце пам’яті й спільноти, яке ми продовжуємо захищати. 🌿Проте боротьба за Протасів Яр триває. І зараз нам дуже потрібна ваша підтримка в суді. 8 липня 2026 рок

30

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @save_protas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 174,930 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Громада Протасового яру” (@save_protas), 1,070 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/save_protas.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.