Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for closed

Channel

closed

@save11a

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001919282608
TypeChannel
Username@save11a
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 14 July 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded27 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/save11a

Growth

1027 Aug 2026, 17:00 — 10 subscribers27 Aug 2026, 23:34 — 10 subscribers27 Aug 2026, 17:0027 Aug 2026, 23:34
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9–11 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 23:3410no change
27 Aug 2026, 17:0010first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 14 July 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

21 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤓733.3%
🤣733.3%
628.6%
🍓14.76%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2023 to 15 July 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Jul 2023, 04:20 UTC578 viewsread 27 August 2026

Нигина извинялась в надежде что что-то исправит лично к Ив и Соне, но никак чтобы её все пожалели и она была в хорошем свете. Как и сказала она в своём первом самом сообщении, она несёт ответственность за свои сообщения, любые, и то что уже сказано — не стерешь из памяти у других. Она это всё прекрасно понимала и сейчас мне говорит. Так что , она явно не хотела себя защищать или как-то оправдать извинениями.

14 Jul 2023, 21:38 UTC556 viewsread 27 August 2026

Я надеюсь, что вы все меня поняли. Удачи вам, живите дружно, не повторяйте моих фатальных ошибок

14 Jul 2023, 21:32 UTC494 views3 reactionsread 27 August 2026

Ещё раз повторюсь — сделала это только я. Виновата только я, только я всё сливала, только я писала текст, только я исаала сообщения, участницы даже не знали об этом ни-че-го. Я понимаю, что вряд-ли вы мне поверите, но это так. Что по поводу Сони и Ив — если вы массово будете травит их, то это будет максимально неправильно , ведь я уже скпзпла, что виноваты лишь они в том, что встретили такого человека как я. Пожалуй

🤓3

14 Jul 2023, 21:27 UTC384 viewsread 27 August 2026

Пожалуйста, не травите никого, умоляб

14 Jul 2023, 21:25 UTC375 views7 reactionsread 27 August 2026

Надеюсь после этого сообщения вы поймете что этим сливом я угробила себя, а Ив и Соня практически не виноваты в этом.

🤣7

14 Jul 2023, 21:25 UTC351 viewsread 27 August 2026

По поводу ситуации с Соней и Ив виновата я тем— Я сидела в этом чате Я это заскринила Я это слила Наоборот в этой ситуации виновата лишь Нигина, ведь её поступки перевешивают поступки Сони и Ив. Я тоже писала в этом чате гадости, и если понадобится, то они всем коллективом это сольют . У меня есть свои доказательства и моей виновности, поверьте мне наслово. Соня и Ив редакторы, которых не должны травить. Я прошу бол

14 Jul 2023, 21:16 UTC344 views4 reactionsread 27 August 2026

Сейчас, я от чистого сердца, прошу вас травить лишь меня которую все жто устроила. Ив и Соня то что они писали — виноваты они, но не надо их за это травить, ведь ситуация лично со мной успокоена, и лично я уже не держу зла ни на кого в этой ситуации. В знак извинений, я удаляю аккаунт и удаляю тг в принципе. Ещё раз извинитп за то, что вынесла жто нс публику

🤓4

14 Jul 2023, 21:00 UTC340 views1 reactionsread 27 August 2026

Только Нигина извиняется перед Ив, Соней, и другими людьми которых я задела

🍓1

14 Jul 2023, 21:00 UTC346 views0 reactionsread 27 August 2026

Да, это был цирк, признаем. Единственное чего мы сейчас от вас требуем — оставить в покое всех людей которые были. Минимальное что мы хотим, травли, пускай кто по вашему мнению упадёт в своих глазах, но я правда не хочу травли. Да мы слили других, которые обсирали всех, но оставьте своё мнение при себе умоляю, давайте поживём без травли

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @save11a. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“closed” (@save11a), 10 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/save11a.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.