#BobLoukas Bit of a red flag developing on the Bitcoin Chart today. The Daily is currently showing us a potential Failed 60-day Cycle. We want to see how the daily closes first of all before rushing to major conclusions, but a Failed Daily Cycle is the first component of a Weekly Cycle in Decline. But that can also be noisy indicator, especially when it occurs so early in a cycle, and there is the potential that this…

Channel
СатошиОтКоляна.
@satoshifromkolyan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Cite this entry
8subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001381211665 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @satoshifromkolyan |
| Description | Закрытый канал для КриптоГоликов |
| First recorded | 14 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/satoshifromkolyan |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2026, 17:23 | 8 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 8 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 80.6%
- avg views ÷ 8 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6.4
- 9 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 9
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (15 July 2026 – 8 October 2026) |
| Views total | 58 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Oct 2026, 17:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,170
- Videos
- ≈30
- Links
- ≈522
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
#PeterBrandt https://x.com/Cointelegraph/status/2103499771533025656
#BobLoukas Mentioned Litecoin in the Monday report about a very good (trade) candidate for a pop. It's now up 25% I didn't take it personally, because i took the $XRP setup. Still like that.
#BobLoukas Little bit of a shakeout today after a euphoric week. But it's nothing more than give/take at this point, as the market extended too quickly and those piling into leverage late getting taken out. Retesting the $82.5k breakout level would also be normal. We want to see if it can hold that level and establish a range above towards the $90's. Remember you want to be intentional (planned) with your positions …
Bitcoin ($BTCUSD) continues to perform strongly. I believe the $87,000 area is a point to consider trimming, but that is more relevant for short-term trading based on the daily coil we analyzed. The swing thought, as highlighted in the last 3 or 4 video reviews, was a quarterly up trigger above $82,815. This could potentially lead to a move towards the $97,000 to $99,000 zone next.
#PeterBrandt https://www.loom.com/share/a9511345861e49dfbe76f20017d5414a
#PeterBrandt Bitcoin makes a powerful statement Sep 18, 2026 The past four days consisting of a bear trap followed by today's blast off is a powerful statement. I am moving two more buckets into Bitcoin with a stop under this week's lows. This will represent a 2% risk on the entire portfolio. End
File, posted without a caption
#PeterBrandt
#BobLoukas Nice bounce back by Bitcoin and Crypto broadly. Re-testing last week's high point once more. The area to $82.5k remains the real resistance and when trading cleanly above this level, the market shifts bullish across all time frames. At a 70% spot allocation, feeling happy with this level for this stage of the longer cycle. The area above $82.5k changes the narrative enough to look for even more exposure.
#PeterBrandt September 2, 2026 Hey BitcoinLive members I am heading to Colorado for a long weekend and will observe the markets from there. I'll be back in the saddle on Tuesday next. I have no strong opinion near-term on Bitcoin. I am super curious if the cycles as I understand them will still unfold. If they continue to hold sway on the market we could see a sell off into early Oct -- that is less than 5 weeks a…
#PeterBrandt Hey Bitcoin Live friends I am traveling this week and will not be able to respond to any replies or comments. Sorry. For more than a year I have anticipated a Bitcoin low in early October 2026. Well, I am not going to let ego lead me to prideful insistence. If there is one thing I have learned in 50 years of trading it is humility. Self-imposed or market-imposed, the markets could care less as long as it…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @satoshifromkolyan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“СатошиОтКоляна.” (@satoshifromkolyan), 8 subscribers as measured 14 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/satoshifromkolyan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.