Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for reason‌ : illicit

Channel

reason‌ : illicit

@satinic

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

97subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003442536715
TypeChannel
Username@satinic
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/satinic

Growth

969796.510 August 2026 — 96 subscribers10 August 2026 — 96 subscribers17 August 2026 — 97 subscribers10 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 96–97 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 23:2297+1
10 Aug 2026, 17:2496no change
10 Aug 2026, 01:1796first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 25 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1s
Average length
1s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

422 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 603039944813839038518443.6%
custom 603079508764079664811326.8%
custom 58797187840753079497016.6%
custom 59090811819655223785513.0%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 422reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 10:05 UTC130 views24 reactionsread 10 August 2026

“ اگر، فقط اگر دوستم داشتی، هر عمل سخیف و زشتی برای امنیت و آرامشم از دست‌هات بر می‌اومد. “

custom 603039944813839038514custom 60307950876407966487custom 59090811819655223783

25 Jul 2026, 17:30 UTC195 views24 reactionsread 10 August 2026

“ من فقط طوری که هوانگ هیونجین انجام‌ش می‌ده رو قبول می‌کنم.“

custom 603039944813839038514custom 60307950876407966486custom 58797187840753079492custom 59090811819655223782

25 Jul 2026, 17:29 UTC193 views20 reactionsread 10 August 2026

hwang >>>>

custom 587971878407530794914custom 59090811819655223782custom 60303994481383903852custom 60307950876407966482

25 Jul 2026, 17:29 UTC192 views20 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 587971878407530794914custom 60303994481383903853custom 60307950876407966482custom 59090811819655223781

11 Jul 2026, 17:47 UTC308 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

می‌تونید پارت اول فالنا رو از سرافیم بخونید.

custom 60303994481383903857

11 Jul 2026, 17:47 UTC435 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026

‌‌ : من جهنمِ سهمگینِ او را به آغوش جان می‌کشم.

custom 59090811819655223789custom 60303994481383903855

4 Jul 2026, 17:06 UTC367 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026

اگر یک لیلیا یک ورژن orchestra داشت چی

custom 603039944813839038515custom 60307950876407966482

4 Jul 2026, 17:05 UTC365 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026

اگه لیلیا راشن فولک بود چی

custom 590908118196552237818custom 60307950876407966481

25 Jun 2026, 15:48 UTC549 views39 reactionsread 10 August 2026

اجازه داره، فلیکس باهاش راحته. درواقع با این موضوع که کنترل شه نه اما با این موضوع که هیونجین کنترلش کنه حالش به‌تر می‌شه. و هیونجین به‌ترینش رو در کنترل و مراقبت از موجود شکننده و ارزشمند کنارش وسط می‌ذاره. به‌ترین ترکیب. ‌

custom 603039944813839038529custom 60307950876407966487custom 59090811819655223782custom 58797187840753079491

25 Jun 2026, 15:45 UTC504 views35 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 603039944813839038524custom 60307950876407966485custom 59090811819655223784custom 58797187840753079492

25 Jun 2026, 15:23 UTC970 views40 reactionsread 10 August 2026

فلیکس چه‌قدر مطیع و آروم ایستاده تا پاپا جین دست‌هاش رو ببنده؟ babydoll things.

custom 587971878407530794927custom 60307950876407966487custom 59090811819655223783custom 60303994481383903853

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @satinic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 684,820 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“reason‌ : illicit” (@satinic), 97 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/satinic.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.