Channel
@sateaching
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
2,003subscribers
+11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001342469273 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sateaching |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sateaching |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 2,003 | +4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 1,999 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 1,996 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:55 | 1,993 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 1,992 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 1,992 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (14 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,220 |
| Reactions total | 368 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
707 reactions across 15 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 222 | 31.4% | |
| 💔 | 125 | 17.7% | |
| 👍 | 74 | 10.5% | |
| 😱 | 67 | 9.48% | |
| 🔥 | 60 | 8.49% | |
| 😁 | 53 | 7.50% | |
| 🥰 | 40 | 5.66% | |
| ❤🔥 | 39 | 5.52% | |
| 😍 | 14 | 1.98% | |
| 😭 | 5 | 0.707% | |
| 💅 | 4 | 0.566% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.424% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.141% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 707reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sateaching. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Ещё один плюс жизни в Париже: есть такие автоматы с фруктами и овощами, открытые поздно ночью. Обнаружили мы его с подружкой, просто гуляя по нашему пригороду. Я всегда проходила мимо и не заглядывала внутрь, а тут посмотрела: цены на какие-то продукты кусаются, но концепт шикарный. Фрукты и овощи свежайшие. Найти тут можно от соков и мёда до дынь и персиков. Это если вдруг в час ночи приспичит испечь медовик, а мё…
❤🔥27👍11😱5
А вы знали, что свободно говорят на английском всего около 5% россиян? При этом многие годами учат язык — в школе, университете или на курсах, — но так и не начинают говорить… Знакомо, не правда ли? А происходит это потому что: - нет четкой стратегии обучения; - английский постоянно откладывается «на потом». - многие просто создают видимость занятий, но, на самом деле, не вовлечены в процесс. Поэтому знакомьтесь …
❤11🔥3
Наконец-то в городе вечной любви похолодало до 28-30С У меня очень насыщенные дни: возвращаюсь в режим активной работы и каждый день вижусь с друзьями и учениками. Все решили приехать именно сейчас, а я рада с некоторыми знакомиться вживую 🥺 Хочу в начале-середине сентября устроить встречу подписчиков! Раньше я делала это раз в полгода, сейчас после того случая с подписчиком, мы не виделись с вами уже год. Если и …
❤25🔥7
Вчера была в бассейне и подумала, что вам нужен бассейный вокабуляр! 🏊♀️ А пришла ко мне эта мысль, когда монетка застряла в шкафчике. Пришлось подойти к сотруднику у входа и шутливо сказать: — Le casier a avalé ma pièce ! J’en prends une autre ? (Шкафчик проглотил мою монетку! Можно взять другую?) И подумала, что такой лексике нас почему-то почти нигде не учат. Как назвать «шкафчик», как сказать «застрять»… Я-то…
👍30❤24🔥11⚡1
C’est ballot
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍9
Страшное творится во Франции… Лесные пожары 🫠 Фото и видео мои, но с 2022 года, из Жиронды, где тогда тоже горели леса. В середине августа была четвёртая волна жары именно в этом регионе (на севере было по-моему две волны). Я тогда решила по Франции больше в августе не путешествовать… Всё как в тумане 😶🌫️ Хуже всего было в крупных городах без выхода к морю — в Тулузе и Бордо. А на Dune du Pilat были видны сгоревши…
💔31😱8😭5
Думать о жизни в другом городе — ✅ как же я люблю зацикливать видосы 🤭
❤32🔥13💔9👍2
В июне виделась с нашей прекрасной Дарьей 🌺 Даша преподаёт сейчас у уровней А1-В1, сама сдала examen civique на 40/40, и мы с ней решили разработать мощный курс по подготовке к этому экзамену, который и мне предстоит сдать 🫠 Каждый день работаем по 2-3 часа, чтобы свести всю информацию под один формат, разработать упражнения, выделить лексику, советуемся, делимся результатами, смотрим друг у друга… Вот за это я и о…
🔥18❤12👏3
Моей ученице дали студенческую визу во Францию! Как же я радуюсь 🙏
🥰40👍16❤🔥12❤3
Успешный провал Люди привыкли видеть в соцсетях успешный успех, а я расскажу вам про свой недавний провал (их вообще было очень много на моём тернистом пути, но я иду дальше). Я не знаю, как коротко рассказать о всех провалах и трудностях, может действительно напишу книгу, в которой всё расскажу подробно и с инструкцией для других, чтобы не проживали то же самое. А пока расскажу про недавнее. Это не про жуткий фейл…
💔30😱20❤9👍3
Уже в эту субботу Франция встретится с Англией на ЧМ по ⚽️ Вот такой будет их игра за третье место 🤭
😁18❤17💅4
Из разговора с таксистом Таксист: - Moi j’ai grandi dans un quartier chaud - Dans le 93 ? - Oui - St Denis, Bondy, Bobigny ? - Pire, La Courneuve Перевод и объяснение: - Я вырос в неблагополучном районе. - В 93-м? - Да. - Сен-Дени, Бонди, Бобиньи? - Хуже. Ла Курнёв. Контекст: quartier chaud — буквально «горячий район», то есть неблагополучный, криминальный, опасный район. le 93 — разговорное название департаме…
😱22💔16❤8
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @sateaching. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
C’est ballot
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 600,332 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“sateaching🇫🇷 | Sati FLE” (@sateaching), 2,003 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sateaching.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.