Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

SASHECHQA 540

@sashechqa540

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,487subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001290443874
TypeChannel
Username@sashechqa540
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sashechqa540

Growth

1,4871,4931,4907 August 2026 — 1,493 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,493 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,492 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,493 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,487 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,486–1,494 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 20:151,487-6
11 Aug 2026, 09:341,493+1
8 Aug 2026, 08:401,492-1
7 Aug 2026, 21:471,493no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:591,493first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.9%
avg views ÷ 1,487 subscribers
Avg views / post
341
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.95%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held13 (1 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total4,434
Reactions total161
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 21:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

161 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥8955.3%
❤‍🔥3018.6%
😁116.83%
84.97%
💯74.35%
👍63.73%
🥰42.48%
🥴42.48%
😱10.621%
🤝10.621%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 161reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC132 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Перекрытие по вселенной Чужого Старую татушку в комменты приложу Первый сеанс в концу Кстати. Весь рукав будет по Прометею. Будет просто взрыв!

🔥13🥰4

6 Aug 2026, 20:08 UTC285 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Уникальность этой тутатроыки знаете какая? 7 и сколько то сеансов за месяц! Вот так вот А вы дальше ходите раз в пол года Человек вот видит цель и препятствий нет Через месяц будет турбо красавец

🔥15❤‍🔥6

5 Aug 2026, 19:54 UTC317 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Опять вписался в какую-то цветную заварушку Красил сегодня на проводе, не оч понравилось конечно. Но Вайб присутствует. Мне бы с такими пастельными видяниями Ренессанс поколоть Желающих бы на ренессанс цветной найти - былобыславно!

❤‍🔥103🔥2

5 Aug 2026, 06:54 UTC330 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥9👍2❤‍🔥1🤝1

5 Aug 2026, 06:53 UTC325 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥9💯2❤‍🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 06:49 UTC336 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сначала читайте, потом смотрите на картинки! Щас снова будет говнопост. Вам будет что почитать. Короче Вот Из последнего рилсе моего мы уже поняли, что некоторые люди не видят разницы между хорошей тату и говеной тату. Сиська - сиська, цветок - цветок. Так же есть еще одна вещь, которая тревожит людей, это как не попасть к хуевому мастеру, если у него ну..ну норм портфолио. Смотрите Если вы когда-нибудь сидели на пин

😁5🥴4❤‍🔥31😱1

5 Aug 2026, 06:38 UTC322 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Алоха! А мы тут потихоньку рукав приканчиваем Еще внутри жабича доделаем и вообще шик бокс 🥊

🔥151❤‍🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 07:11 UTC333 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Совсем забыл залить сюда, а то в ВК и инст уже поделился. Это Асклепий - Бог медицины. Запрос на профессиональный рукав в греческой тематике Нравится 💅💉

🔥20👍4❤‍🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC354 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Таргетинг?

  1. Да, помогает21%
  2. Нет, не помогло10%
  3. Было дело, помогало3%
  4. Было дело, полная хуйня8%
  5. Не пользовался64%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

3 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC360 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Высвечивается мне иногда вот такое чудо. Не только от этого чувака, а в целом. Татуеры, пользуетесь услугами таргет-менов?

3 Aug 2026, 05:26 UTC426 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Факт дня: ЛЮДИ РАЗНИЦЫ НЕ ВИДЯТ. Я очень сильно рекомендую вам почитать комментарии под рилсом выше. Там люди буквально пишут, что эти работы (приложил) им реально нравятся, либо они неплохие, либо что в них ничего такого, что они кому-то нравятся Щас не будем спорить о вкусах, щас просто пост констатации факта. Надеюсь, я вам доказал это наглядным опытом)

❤‍🔥7😁63

2 Aug 2026, 07:21 UTC435 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Таких историй на самом деле очень много. Я очень часто слышал от мастеров такой тейк, что я не буду бить, если вижу что это плохая идея. Но! Прямо тебе показывает полную хуйню, и просит её исполнить один в один. И ты к этому относишься, либо как к коммерции и просто делаешь деньги. Либо уже отказываешь в угоду души своей творческой 😹 Было было. Иногда просто делаешь, как делаешь, просто исполняешь работу. Клиент уше

💯5

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @sashechqa540. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTCAnonymous Poll39 voters

Таргетинг?

  1. Да, помогает21%
  2. Нет, не помогло10%
  3. Было дело, помогало3%
  4. Было дело, полная хуйня8%
  5. Не пользовался64%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,221,010 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SASHECHQA 540” (@sashechqa540), 1,487 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sashechqa540.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.