Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Sasha #шгш

Channel

Sasha #шгш

@sasha_shgsh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

774subscribers

+159 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002078073718
TypeChannel
Username@sasha_shgsh
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sasha_shgsh

Growth

615774694.57 August 2026 — 615 subscribers8 August 2026 — 615 subscribers16 August 2026 — 629 subscribers23 August 2026 — 628 subscribers29 August 2026 — 721 subscribers7 September 2026 — 774 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 30 days, net +159. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 591–798 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 05:41774+53
29 Aug 2026, 19:03721+93
23 Aug 2026, 17:04628-1
16 Aug 2026, 18:14629+14
8 Aug 2026, 03:03615no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:57615first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

89 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2730.3%
custom 53234328761406767011719.1%
custom 53256725555566437281516.9%
custom 53052868282936433621314.6%
custom 5420418129652115714910.1%
custom 583481502984464362466.74%
custom 532589667124512474422.25%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 89 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 10 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sasha_shgsh. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 22:04 UTC76 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

1custom 53234328761406767011custom 53256725555566437281custom 58348150298446436241

7 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTC155 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

2custom 53234328761406767011custom 53256725555566437281custom 54204181296521157141

7 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC226 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Кто лучше?

  1. Настя (Полина) 💗71%
  2. Ксюша 🌟43%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

7 Aug 2026, 03:40 UTC257 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 53234328761406767018custom 58348150298446436244custom 53256725555566437281

5 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC384 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

7custom 53256725555566437283custom 54204181296521157141

5 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC392 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

мой новый Boyfriend ❤️

custom 532343287614067670174custom 53256725555566437283custom 54204181296521157142custom 53258966712451247441

4 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC531 views19 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

muaaaa

custom 530528682829364336213custom 542041812965211571432custom 53256725555566437281

4 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC526 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 532567255555664372842custom 54204181296521157141custom 58348150298446436241

2 Aug 2026, 07:08 UTC724 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

вайби-вайб ❤️

9custom 53256725555566437281custom 53258966712451247441custom 54204181296521157141

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @sasha_shgsh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTCAnonymous Poll95 voters

Кто лучше?

  1. Настя (Полина) 💗71%
  2. Ксюша 🌟43%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sasha #шгш” (@sasha_shgsh), 774 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sasha_shgsh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.