7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -109. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,132–29,273 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 23:05
29,148
-2
13 Aug 2026, 16:27
29,150
-8
12 Aug 2026, 17:56
29,158
-25
11 Aug 2026, 16:43
29,183
-28
10 Aug 2026, 17:37
29,211
-22
9 Aug 2026, 17:03
29,233
-24
8 Aug 2026, 17:31
29,257
first reading
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.0%
avg views ÷ 29,148 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,960
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
26 (5 August 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
128,830
Reactions total
3,931
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,030
Videos
≈994
Links
≈419
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
10m 20s
Average length
1m 02s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,931 reactions across 26 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,073
52.7%
😁
558
14.2%
🔥
554
14.1%
😍
255
6.49%
🤡
231
5.88%
👍
103
2.62%
😭
67
1.70%
🤝
31
0.789%
💊
24
0.611%
😎
22
0.56%
🗿
9
0.229%
💅
4
0.102%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,931reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#саша_мода_это_не_ваше
Без лишних прелюдий - я в диком восторге от осенней коллекции в Gloria Jeans 🍂🍁
В Нижнем последние дни +10 и дождь, поэтому было принято решение утепляться, не дожидаясь осени. Очень соскучилась по многослойности и текстурам! А этот желтый оттенок свитера - ну любовь 🫶🏼
Мне кажется, или у меня стало лучше сочетать между собой вещи? Наряжалась, кайфовала и кокетничала с мужем
Полгода в последние дни ужасная, +10 и дождь) Август видимо заранее готовит нас к осени (дурак, торопится)
Нехотя вылезли из кровати после сна, достали кофты и пошли мокнуть. А как у вас температура в городе?
🖇️Пинетки Елисея
Размер 13, внутри искусственный мех, удобно надевать и не спадают
🖇️ Горчичная куртка
Брала еще зимой на распродаже на вырост
P.S. уже начинаю жалеть, что в некоторые теплые дни ленилась и си…
Сериал про наш день дома. На улице холодно, дождь, поэтому у нас операция ✨гнездование✨
Хотелось так много всего рассказать, что получилось пять серий, в центре сюжета – новые контейнеры (ну а что вы хотели от человека с ребенком))
Беру все мелочи для дома в Master House, там есть все нужное от гладильных досок до мусорных пакетов. Качество прекрасное, рекомендую 🤝
Мои новенькие контейнеры:
🤩 с бамбуковой крышкой
🤩…
О, а ещё у меня сегодня нашли седой волос!!! Буду думать, что это своеобразное посвящение в родительство после года ребёнку))
А когда у вас пошли первые свои волосы?
P.S. Считаю этот цвет очень красивым, раньше даже специально красилась в пепельно серый
У нас сегодня день красоты, ходили стричься
Отдохнуть не получилось, Елисея постричь тоже не получилось, но хотя бы там поспал под шум фена. Уже победа!
Сегодня появилось дикое желание покраситься в рыжий этой осенью, дала себе время чтобы проверить силу своих намерений)) а вы часто меняете образ? Или у вас есть стабильный цвет волос и стрижка
А еще!!!! у меня сегодня нашли первый седой волос)
Распаковка стильных мелочей с ALIEXPRESS 💅💅
Делюсь недавними покупками - скоро приедет вторая партия со взрослыми и детскими вещами на осень
Косынка https://ali.click/c8o6j1a
Косынка 2 https://ali.click/2go6j10
Гетры https://ali.click/xeo6j1f
Желтые штаны https://ali.click/1ho6j1f
Кепка https://ali.click/kio6j19
Белые штаны https://ali.click/hko6j18
Как вам формат? Снимать такие распаковки?
Друзья, хелп! Очень нужна детская тарелка на присосках, которую хрен оторвешь от стола
Ибо я заколебалась мыть пол после каждой еды. У меня так уже будет нервный срыв 🥲🙂↕️
Попробовала три разных брэнда – одна хуже другого)) Миюми самая приемлемая
#нам_пишут
Дорогой Иван Фьючер, пусть у меня и неинстаграмный муж, но зато человек отличный (в отличие от вас).
По по-моему скромному мнению – 11/11 🙂↕️ как думаете, какие там критерии оценивания?)
Часть 2
Так интересно смотреть, как от фотографии фотографии Елисей превращается из маленького кабачка во взрослого человека
А чему вас научило родительство?
Вышел репортаж по телевизору про отцовский клуб!!! Смотрю, улыбаюсь, ищу мужа - нашла )
И наша Настя тоже в телевизоре (многие тут проходили у нее интенсивный по режиму и сну). Радуюсь, горжусь!
Вот такие хорошие новости на сегодня 💔 А что у вас хорошего?
❤123🔥58😎15🤝5😁1
Signed Александра Никулина
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @sasha_optimist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 463,924 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Оптимистично 🤝” (@sasha_optimist), 29,148 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sasha_optimist.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.