Channel
@sarzaminearoosaka
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
8,687subscribers
+22 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001151937391 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sarzaminearoosaka |
| Description | هرکی عاشق بافتن عروسکای خوشگل هست این کانالو از دست نده👇 @sarzaminearoosaka #آموزش_رایگان_همراه_بافیلم آیدی من😘🌹 @zahra3384 تعرفه تبلیغات: لینک گروه رفع اشکال👍👍 https://t.me/joinchat/SD4VyZAEsdEOOEqu |
| Created | Between 1 November 2019 and 31 December 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sarzaminearoosaka |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Aug 2026, 07:43 | 8,687 | +7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 8,680 | +3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 8,677 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:40 | 8,675 | +9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 8,666 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 8,665 | first reading |
60 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 58 of 60 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 60 (1 August 2026 – 18 August 2026) |
| Views total | 34,861 |
| Reactions total | 366 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Aug 2026, 06:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
366 reactions across 58 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 335 | 91.5% | |
| 👍 | 23 | 6.28% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 1.37% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 0.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 58 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 366reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺 عزیزان هنرمند با انرژی وتوان چند برابر ما آمادیم❣پس کامواهای رنگی و قلاب های طلایی تون راآماده کنید که همراه با بافت های زیباتون باهم ببافیم و ماهم معرفی کانالهای خوب🌹 👇👇👇 پس سریع با دستهای پرتوان خودتون روی لینکهای زیر بزنید تا اونها رابدست بیارید 🥀🥀🥀🥀 🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 @baftnahid 🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 @parniaR95 🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 @kolbeyearoosakha 🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 @shima_baft 🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 @nasim_arusak 🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 @sarzaminearoosaka 🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹 تک تک کانالها🌹 پر…
✨ آموزش مجموعه عروسکهای مخملی دوستداشتنی ✨ 🐰 پیتر خرگوشه | بنجامین | دم پنبهای 🦊 جودی هاپس و نیک وایلد 🤍 عروسکهایی نرم، لطیف و بغلی ✨ مناسب برای سیسمونی نوزاد و هدیهای خاص و ماندگار 🌸 یادگیری ساخت ۵ شخصیت جذاب و پرطرفدار 📚 دستور نوشتاری روان و مرحلهبهمرحله ✅ همراه با رفع اشکال و پشتیبانی آموزشی 💰 قیمت اصلی آموزش: ۴۵۰ تومان 🔥 با تخفیف ویژه فقط: ۱۹۸ تومان ⏳ تخفیف محدود است؛ فرصت ساخت این کوچولوهای دوستداشتنی را…
❤2
✨ این ایده اینستاگرام را خودت بباف🧶💕 🧸 آموزش ۲۶ آویز دوستداشتنی و کاربردی اگر دنبال کاری هستی که: 🌸 زمان و هزینه کمتری نسبت به بافت عروسکهای بزرگ نیاز دارید 🌸 سریعتر آماده فروش شود 🌸 مناسب آویز کیف، موبایل، آینه ماشین و هدیههای خاص باشد این مجموعه دقیقاً برای توست✨ 📝 دستور نوشتاری کامل 💬 همراه با رفع اشکال 💰 هزینه آموزش فقط ۱۹۸ تومان سرزمین عروسکا؛ جایی که با چند نخ و کمی خلاقیت، قصههای کوچک میسازی 💕 جهت …
❤3
🌸 آموزش مجموعه ۱۱ آویز پرفروش و کاربردی 🌸 🎀 فقط با یک آموزش، چندین محصول جذاب بسازید! ✅ آویز کیف ✅ آویز آینه جلوی ماشین ✅ کش موی فانتزی ✅ هدیهای خاص و دستساز ✅ مناسب فروش آنلاین و سفارشگیری 🎥 آموزش کامل از صفر تا صد مناسب مبتدیها و حرفهایها ۲۵۰ هزار تومان ❌ 🔥 فقط ۹۹ هزار تومان 📍 فقط در کانال سرزمین عروسکا با یک آموزش، چند مدل محصول پرفروش بساز و درآمدت را شروع کن. 🌸 جهت دریافت آموزش @zahra3384 @sarzaminearoo
❤2
✨ آموزش نوشتاری شخصیتهای هانتریکس ✨ 🎀 اگر عاشق بافت عروسکهای خاص و ترند هستی، این آموزش مخصوص توست! 📚 در این مجموعه آموزش نوشتاری، دستور کامل بافت ۳ شخصیت محبوب هانتریکس را دریافت میکنی. ✅ آموزش مرحلهبهمرحله و روان ✅ همراه با تصاویر راهنما ✅ مناسب برای بافندههای سطح متوسط و حرفهای 💰 قیمت اصلی: ۳۰۰ هزار تومان 🔥 تخفیف ویژه: فقط ۱۹۵ هزار تومان 🎁 با یک خرید، آموزش هر ۳ شخصیت را دریافت میکنی. ⏳ این تخفیف برای مدت …
❤1
«خب… وقتشه بالاخره معرفیش کنم 😍 ✨ یک کار جذاب و دوستداشتنی جدید از سرزمین عروسکا ✨ آموزش با قیمت واقعی ۲۸۰ هزار تومان اما برای مدت محدود با تخفیف ویژه فقط ۹۹ هزار تومان 🎀 ⏳ فرصت این قیمت محدود هست.» جهت دریافت آموزش @zahra3384 @sarzaminearoosaka
❤3
✨ آمادهای با ما ببافی؟ 🧶🧸 گروهبافی جدید سرزمین عروسکا شروع شد! 💕 اگر دوست داری این عروسک دوستداشتنی رو همراه ما ببافی، از لینک زیر وارد گروه شو 👇 https://t.me/+o8TOcQvXtrwzZjVk @zahra3384
❤8🤩2
اگر دوست داری این عروسک رو همراه من و بقیه هنرجوها ببافی، این گروهبافی رو از دست نده! 😍 @zhara3384
❤3
آموزش گروهبافی فقط دستور بافت نیست! برای قسمتهای سخت و مهم عروسک، فیلم آموزشی هم قرار میگیره تا با خیال راحتتر همراه گروه باشید. 🌸🧶 @zahra3384
❤4
این بار قراره با هم یک عروسک جدید و دوستداشتنی رو از صفر تا صد ببافیم. قدمبهقدم در کنار هم پیش میریم تا هیچ قسمتی براتون سخت و مبهم نمونه. 💕 @zhara3384
❤4
یه خبر خوب برای بافندههای دوستداشتنی سرزمین عروسکا دارم! 🥰 بالاخره وقتشه یک گروهبافی جدید رو با هم شروع کنیم. 🧶✨ @zahra3384
❤4🤩1
صبح یکشنبهتون بخیر و پر از حس خوب 🌸☀️ یک هفتهی تازه شروع شده؛ یک هفته برای بافتن، خلق کردن و رسیدن به ایدههای تازه 🧶✨ امیدوارم امروزتون پر از آرامش، دستهای خلاق و کلی اتفاق قشنگ باشه. 💕 یکشنبهتون شیرین و پُر از برکت 🌷 @zahra3384
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @sarzaminearoosaka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 208,778 of 1,566,395entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@sarzaminearoosaka named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🌸سرزمین عروسکا🌸” (@sarzaminearoosaka), 8,687 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sarzaminearoosaka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.