Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Sarkarinomics

Channel

Sarkarinomics

@sarkarinomics

Not marked by Telegram, checked 2 September 2026

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

425subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002206516712
TypeChannel
Username@sarkarinomics
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded1 September 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sarkarinomics

Growth

4251 Sept 2026, 06:15 — 425 subscribers1 Sept 2026, 08:28 — 425 subscribers1 Sept 2026, 06:151 Sept 2026, 08:28
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 424–426 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 08:28425no change
1 Sept 2026, 06:15425first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.7%
avg views ÷ 425 subscribers
Avg views / post
165
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held20 (15 February 202624 August 2026)
Views total329
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 06:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

96 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5961.5%
👍2829.2%
👏66.25%
11.04%
❤‍🔥11.04%
🙏11.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 February 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC213 views4 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

A confluence of renewed war and extreme weather is threatening global food prices, as Russian attacks on Ukraine’s Black Sea infrastructure—including the destruction of key export terminals in Novorossiysk—have halted significant grain shipments, while intense summer heatwaves across Europe, Russia, and the US have severely slashed crop yields for wheat, corn, and soybeans. This supply squeeze has driven wheat prices

👍3❤‍🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 06:18 UTC284 views5 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Purpose of Reviews: The RBI's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meets every two months to decide on interest rates, aiming to maintain price stability in the economy. · Inflation Target: The RBI targets a retail inflation rate of 4%, with a tolerance band of +/- 2 percentage points (i.e., between 2% and 6%). · Why 4%? This level is considered ideal: higher inflation hurts consumers' purchasing power, while lower infl

👏41

30 May 2026, 02:15 UTC510 views6 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

The article argues that inflation and affordability are not the same thing. While inflation measures the year-on-year rate at which prices are rising, affordability depends on whether people’s incomes are growing faster than the overall price level. Although India’s retail inflation has largely remained within the RBI’s target range of 2–6% in recent years and has fallen to around 2% in 2025–26, the cumulative rise i

5👍1

27 May 2026, 09:08 UTC389 views6 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

The article discusses the Reserve Bank of India’s record dividend transfer of about ₹2.87 lakh crore to the government and argues that, although it provides short-term fiscal relief, it also raises concerns about long-term fiscal dependence on the RBI. The dividend helps the government manage high subsidy expenses and reduce borrowing pressure, but the author notes that RBI profits are volatile because they depend on

5👏1

16 May 2026, 05:56 UTC336 views5 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

The article explains that the recent spike in global crude oil prices, driven by tensions in West Asia, poses a major challenge for the Indian economy because India depends heavily on imported oil. Higher crude prices increase fuel costs, worsen inflation, widen the trade deficit, weaken the rupee, and put pressure on government finances through higher subsidies or borrowing. The article shows that periods of high oi

👍4🙏1

12 May 2026, 04:42 UTC379 views8 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

The article argues that while the government’s call to reduce imports and save foreign exchange—by cutting consumption of imported goods like gold, edible oil, fertilisers, and crude oil—may temporarily ease pressure on India’s forex reserves and current account deficit, it could also slow economic growth if not matched by stronger domestic production. The author explains that reducing consumption lowers demand, disc

5👍3

6 Apr 2026, 17:36 UTC456 views6 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

The article argues that the ongoing conflict involving Iran could trigger stagflation—a combination of high inflation and low growth—similar to the 1970s oil shocks. Disruptions in energy supply, especially through critical routes like the Strait of Hormuz, act as negative supply shocks, shifting supply curves leftward, raising prices while reducing output. Unlike earlier crises, the current shock is more severe beca

6

31 Mar 2026, 05:46 UTCviews —

Sarkarinomics pinned «Hi folks Hope you are preparing well. The only intention of this channel is to make you learn Economics using real world events. You should know it well that studying core economic theories will never help if you are missing its real world applications. …»

31 Mar 2026, 05:44 UTC467 views9 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Hi folks Hope you are preparing well. The only intention of this channel is to make you learn Economics using real world events. You should know it well that studying core economic theories will never help if you are missing its real world applications. Happy reading!!

9

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sarkarinomics. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Upsc Mains Test Series
@UpscMainsTestSeriesss · 37,093
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 31 here — alongside 30 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sarkarinomics” (@sarkarinomics), 425 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sarkarinomics.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.