Channel
@sarahatelier
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,284subscribers
-28 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001714831317 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sarahatelier |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sarahatelier |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 2,284 | -11 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 2,295 | -9 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 2,304 | -6 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 2,310 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 10:39 | 2,311 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 2,312 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:35 | 2,312 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (8 June 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,713 |
| Reactions total | 110 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 01:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
167 reactions across 13 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5291825468780083091 | 167 | 100.0% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 167 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Также хочу обратить ваше внимание на то, что все курсы сейчас находятся в процессе съемки 🌸 Поэтому на данный момент выложены еще не все уроки. Новые материалы добавляются практически каждый день, и программа курса постепенно пополняется Поэтому после покупки вы будете получать доступ не только к уже загруженным урокам, но и к новым материалам по мере их выхода🌸
custom 529182546878008309112
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته Сестры, вижу, что многие из вас до сих пор спрашивают про возможность приобрести мой курс по старой цене, поэтому хочу внести ясность Доступ к старой версии курса по прежней цене больше не продается и продаваться не будет ❕ Мои ученицы уже перешли на новый, полностью обновленный курс, поэтому сейчас я продаю доступ именно к новой версии – с обновленной информацией и материалами Сто…
custom 529182546878008309113
Расцветки на этот химар 🌸
custom 529182546878008309111
Этот химар настолько удобный и красивый 🌸 В нем целых 6 метров ткани, благодаря чему он красиво ложится и полностью все закрывает А самое удобное – подхиджабник уже вшит, поэтому не нужно покупать его отдельно и переживать, что химар будет съезжать А чтобы химар прослужил как можно дольше, низ полностью обработан московским швом – край получается аккуратным, прочным и устойчивым к износу Если хотите увидеть, как о…
custom 529182546878008309112
Двухслойный химар с имитацией платка и вшитым подхиджабником • длина химара: 130/160 • ткань: шифон • сезон: демисезонный 🏷5890₽ Доступно к заказу в других расцветках _____________________ Заказать онлайн: @maturrush / +7 999 311-60-51
custom 529182546878008309115
Продаю свою тунику из льна в идеальном состоянии 🌟 2000₽
custom 529182546878008309112
Делюсь отзывом на обновление моего курса, اللّٰهـم بارِك 🩷 Ученицы уже перешли на обновление курса и видят как постепенно добавляются уроки. Формат курса стал еще удобнее и структурированнее, الحمدلله Пусть Аллах вложит в него пользу и принесет благо каждому, кто будет обучаться 🫂
custom 529182546878008309116
Процесс съемки уроков)
custom 529182546878008309119
Туника-летучка на молнии / Юбка в трапецию • ткань: крапива рами • сезон: демисезонная 🏷9490₽ Доступно к заказу в других расцветках _____________________ Заказать онлайн: @maturrush / +7 999 311-60-51
custom 52918254687800830917
Рубашка в китайском стиле / Юбка по косой • ткань: лен сафари • сезон: демисезонная 🏷6990₽ Доступно к заказу в других расцветках _____________________ Заказать онлайн: @maturrush / +7 999 311-60-51
custom 529182546878008309112
Кропотливая работа, اللّٰهـم بارِك 🤩
custom 529182546878008309112
Платье Sarah • ткань: крапива рами • сезон: демисезонный 🏷10490₽ Доступно к заказу в других расцветках _____________________ Заказать онлайн: @maturrush / +7 999 311-60-51
custom 529182546878008309118
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @sarahatelier. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,076,347 of 1,629,452 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“sárahatelier” (@sarahatelier), 2,284 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sarahatelier.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.