Channel
@sar_vesada
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,251subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 5 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002213831164 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sar_vesada |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sar_vesada |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:22 | 2,251 | +8 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 21:22 | 2,243 | no change |
| 5 Sept 2026, 20:47 | 2,243 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (20 June 2026 – 5 September 2026) |
| Views total | 739 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Sept 2026, 21:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sar_vesada. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 June 2026 to 5 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
پشمام پـ,ــ,ـرده زنی زفاف شب عروسی 😐🔞🔞 دختره با لباس عروسی میاد رو تخت میگه من میترسم یوقت درد نداشته باشه داماد یکم قربون صدقش میره و هل میده توش و ... 🍌 هرچی عکسشو میزاریم کاملا واقعیه! مشاهده فیلم مشاهده فیلم 🔞🍌👠 Ad Folder +2k :@Moonn_bn
Live stream started
ابلیس زاده نداند معنی صداقت را
کال فعال
File, posted without a caption
وقتی یکی با نقاب رفاقت نزدیکت میشه، بیشتر از دشمن باید ازش ترسید. بعضیا فقط تا وقتی منفعت دارن کنار آدم میمونن و بعد، اولین نفرن که از پشت خنجر میزنن. نقابشون دوستیه، ولی ذاتشون دشمنی. آدمی که ارزشش رو با خیانت ثابت میکنه، حتی ارزش دشمنی هم نداره.
تنها کسی که حق داره باهام سرد رفتار کنه👁
کیری ترین ریسک دنیا اعتماده.
ریشه اگر محکم باشد، هیچ بادی هویتت را از تو نمیگیرد.
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed A D I
سگ های گرسنه هیچوقت وفا دار نیستن
Signed A D I
بازی رو عوض کن، نه هدفت رو.
Signed A D I
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sar_vesada. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“sarvesada” (@sar_vesada), 2,251 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sar_vesada.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.