Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
3 measurements spanning 24 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 186–187 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
31 Aug 2026, 19:17
186
-1
8 Aug 2026, 12:04
187
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:43
187
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 6 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
31s
Average length
31s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
313 reactions across 17 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5357579953497983889
97
31.0%
❤
66
21.1%
❤🔥
25
7.99%
💔
24
7.67%
😢
24
7.67%
💯
12
3.83%
🔥
12
3.83%
🤩
10
3.19%
custom 5427232022252764138
9
2.88%
🕊
6
1.92%
🥰
6
1.92%
👍
4
1.28%
🙏
4
1.28%
custom 5357584845465730934
3
0.958%
custom 5424972835095329742
3
0.958%
☃
3
0.958%
🎄
2
0.639%
🦄
2
0.639%
💅
1
0.319%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 313 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 November 2025 to 22 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 18 we hold a reading for · 78%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sapogambre. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 November 2025 to 22 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Друзья, всем привет!
Если я буду тут публиковать информацию о флаконах, которые хочу продать, будет ли вам это интересно?
Я не хочу свой личный ароматный дневничок превращать в барахолку, могу выставлять в случае, если вам это интересно будет.
Да, выставляй на продажу98%
Нет, хотим иногда что-то почитывать и всё3%
Как же ты утомила, не отписываюсь только из солидарности0%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Сегодня ездила с кошкой на лучевую терапию в парфюме на затылке, но уже даже не вспомню, в каком. Тут себя бы хоть помнить.
Купила себе в дополнение к рабочему ДМС страховку Онкопомощь.
Родителям тоже куплю.
Это как с машиной: вы же их страхуете, правда?
Что до парфюмерии детально: сейчас вот новый Шалимар ванильный по хорошей цене ниже ЦУМа можно купить у моего друга Влада @vladigross.
Если кому-то нужно, дайте знат…
Сегодня решилась нанести на себя настоящую парфюмерию.
Мне прямо физически захотелось нюхать с себя Персик из бутикового Герлен.
Нанесла на затылок и ниже груди: как же мне хватило этих пшиков!
Нос отвык от парфюмерии абсолютно!
Сейчас в ужасе думаю о том, как я душила людей своими 8-ю и большими пшиками, в том числе таким орудием, как Existence Amouage.
Детокс случился.
#mood
Канал затевался как парфюмерный, но если вы не против, то я буду иногда говорить и на другие темы.
Во-первых, моя пушистая королева после операции начала хотя бы принимать грациозные положения. Шов заживает, мы ждём дальнейшие планы действий от онколога.
Во-вторых, сегодня в обед с ужасом поняла, что у меня на ногтях гель-лак отрос в половину ногтя, а записаться к моему мастеру уже нельзя.
Записалась в ближайший ногт…
Друзья, привет! У меня продолжается парфюмерный аскетизм.
Расскажите, как у вас перед праздниками? Что нового купили?
Чем предпочитаете пользоваться в эту погоду?
#mood
#ктовчем
Конец года настолько ужасен, что мне не хочется парфюмов. Кое-как решился вопрос по болезни близкого человека, теперь сильно заболела моя любимая кошка. Ароматы почти две недели не хочу нюхать и пшикать на себя. Сегодня вечером напряжение чуть спало, нанесла на себя Chopard Арабский мед, который мне казался "никаким", а он, оказывается, такой стойкий и диффузный.
Получается, что парф голодание очень освежает рецептор…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @sapogambre. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Друзья, всем привет!
Если я буду тут публиковать информацию о флаконах, которые хочу продать, будет ли вам это интересно?
Я не хочу свой личный ароматный дневничок превращать в барахолку, могу выставлять в случае, если вам это интересно будет.
Да, выставляй на продажу98%
Нет, хотим иногда что-то почитывать и всё3%
Как же ты утомила, не отписываюсь только из солидарности0%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 November 2025 to 22 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кирзовое амбре” (@sapogambre), 186 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sapogambre.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.