Channel
@saparbi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,668subscribers
-21 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001239636689 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @saparbi |
| Created | 21 November 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/saparbi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 5,668 | -18 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:42 | 5,686 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:07 | 5,688 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 5,689 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:05 | 5,689 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 24 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
684 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 447 | 65.4% | |
| 🔥 | 82 | 12.0% | |
| 🤡 | 62 | 9.06% | |
| 😢 | 57 | 8.33% | |
| 👍 | 29 | 4.24% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 0.439% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 0.439% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.146% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 684reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 11 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @saparbi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 May 2026 to 11 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Сегодня (11 июля 1995 года) отмечается 31-я годовщина геноцида в Сребренице. Сербские силы казнили 8372 боснийских мусульман в "зоне безопасности" Организации Объединенных Наций в Сребренице. Более 8000 мусульман были похоронены в братских могилах, некоторые из которых до сих пор не обнаружены. @saparbinews
😢51❤2
Я не понимаю одну вещь. Достоверно известно, что некоторые организации по «защите прав» в частности КАВКАЗСКИХ женщин тянут свои грязные ручонки из исхаэля мордора, как например хеда_медиа. Я реально думала, что все мусульмане в курсе и игнорируют эту сионистскую помойку, ибо взгляды организаторов ясны и прозрачны. Но до сих пор находятся те, кто на них подписаны, репостят и поддерживают. Зачем? Кого вы поддерживае…
❤83👍26🤯3
Друзья (девочки), я к вам с быстрым анонсом. Мы в книжном клубе определились с книгой, поэтому если вы хотели бы почитать с нами «Мировой порядок» Киссинджера со встречами по пятницам в 20:00, то есть возможность запрыгнуть в последний вагон💅 по всем вопросам пожалуйста — @saparbiteam
❤5
«не скажу, что я был великим патриотом, но когда коснулись моего народа, внутри все оборвалось. тогда я осознал, что где бы ты не был, связь со своей землей и народом настолько тонко прошита изнутри с самого рождения, что ее невозможно оборвать или игнорировать. если больно твоему народу, больно становится и тебе.»
❤108
В тредсе всех так вдруг взволновал арабский язык в школах. Как будто от того, что все это время в программе был английский, бывшие российские школьники массово стали путешественниками и агентами ЦРУ. В 2014 году я заканчивала экстерном школу. Мой папа мечтал, чтобы я училась в МГИМО. Я мечтала стать востоковедом (арабистом). Было решено отдать меня на подфак МГИМО с арабским языком. И знаете, что я услышала? «Девоче…
❤99🔥30
Девочки! (И только девочки😂) знаю, что наверно надоела с этим, но также знаю, что потом будете спрашивать!!! Еще раз предупреждаю о том, что мы скоро начинаем читать новую книгу в моем книжном клубе. Пока еще выбираем какую именно книгу, — так как еще не все в сборе, от того и выбор на стопе, но я с нетерпением жду начала. Вы, конечно, можете присоединиться позднее, но тогда пропустите начало, а так не интересно! …
❤16👍3🔥3
🙌🏻
Мир всем! Хотела сказать, что набор в книжный клуб продолжается, еще пару человек и мы начнем💚 Мне вообще часто поступают вопросы насчет книг. И если вы хотите не только получить рекомендации, но и научиться вчитываться, анализировать информацию и обсуждать это совместно с такими же заинтересованными читателями, как и вы — я вас приглашаю в свой книжный клуб. Сейчас пока действует специальная цена 1999₽/месяц Почи…
❤5🔥3
Ну, ребят, вернемся в прошлое.. теперь можете задавать вопросы анонимно, как когда-то в аске (а для дедов — формспринге) Задать анонимный вопрос можно по ссылке: 👉 t.me/thevoprosybot?start=as7f9
❤6
Самая опасная ложь в истории — не «откровенная пропаганда». А удобная версия событий, которую попросту никто не проверяет.
🔥46😢3❤1
Дорогие друзья! Поздравляю вас всех со священным праздником ид аль-Адха🫶🏻 Пусть Аллах примет ваши молитвы и благие дела, наполнит ваши дни счастьем, спокойствием и благословением. ТакъабаляЛлаху минна уа минкум💚
❤37
Сегодня и завтра последние дни!💖
❤11
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @saparbi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 187,017 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sup are be” (@saparbi), 5,668 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/saparbi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.