опередил время?
⚡1

Channel
@sanye_fest
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
166subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001454455166 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sanye_fest |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sanye_fest |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:08 | 166 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 167 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 167 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 5 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
48 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5449692618151695997 | 10 | 20.8% | |
| 💯 | 10 | 20.8% | |
| 🤔 | 9 | 18.8% | |
| 💔 | 6 | 12.5% | |
| custom 5449380056201697322 | 4 | 8.33% | |
| 💅 | 3 | 6.25% | |
| 🫡 | 3 | 6.25% | |
| 😐 | 2 | 4.17% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 2.08% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2025 to 9 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sanye_fest. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2025 to 9 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
опередил время?
⚡1
> вот думаю, хорошо бы запостить в 2026 что-то искреннее, а ещё лучше - полезное >> смотрю на индусов в тиктоке под треки моей любимой группы из 2010 >>> просыпаюсь в поту, а это оно и есть
🤔6💔1
2016>2026 https://open.spotify.com/album/5TVchQCX0N6vdQk9jfFIJZ?si=qOjCt9IDRoOC7aU_LSOSbQ
ну это подшар года, не ожидал / впервые сильно жду итоги спотика, наглосаксы нормально так присели мне на уши / куча клевых ребят не тимоти шаламе и минком единым
💯3
мне странно, когда современники @<> пишут витиевато во-первых современники во-вторых витиевато и в-третьих - странно влепи там три слоя иронии или зашифруй абстрактно, нет же: «мне странно, когда современники пишут витиевато»
🤔3
Modern menswear by Davies, Hywel (2008, Laurence King)
custom 54496926181516959974
#archivebooks@sanye_fest
Hedi Slimane for i-D Magazine - “The Elevator Issue”, October 1999
custom 54496926181516959972
📦
"Прямым инструментом тренировки рассеянного восприятия становящегося все более заметным во всех областях искусства и являющегося симптомом глубокого преобразования восприятия является кино. Своим шоковым воздействием кино отвечает этой форме восприятия. Кино вытесняет культовое значение не только тем, что помещает публику в оценивающую позицию, но тем, что эта оценивающая позиция в кино не требует внимания. Публика о…
💯7😐2
Сегодня приснилось, что я застрял внутри экселевской таблицы. Не помню, как выбрался, но потом вроде снилась молодая Лариса Долина - возможно, благодаря ей. Решил отдать дань уважения за это - завтракаю под "Погоду в доме"
custom 54496926181516959972
и 4й самый главный вывод, который догнал меня только сейчас: / после одиссеи очень легко считывается архетипичная схематика "путешествия героя" в абсолютном большинстве сюжетов (а также очень тяжело делиться личными открытиями, потому что..эээм..они личные и основаны на личном опыте??) / в общем, чтобы звучало увлекательнее - если хотите прям вкусно врубаться в 99% культурного контента и создавать для себя смыслы, то…
💔3custom 54496926181516959972
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @sanye_fest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SF” (@sanye_fest), 166 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sanye_fest.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.