Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Sanju's Prjkt - Updates

Channel

Sanju's Prjkt - Updates

@sanjusprjktupdates

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

256subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001863621148
TypeChannel
Username@sanjusprjktupdates
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sanjusprjktupdates

Growth

255256255.57 Aug 2026, 23:18 — 255 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:18 — 255 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:37 — 256 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 23:188 Aug 2026, 09:37
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 255–256 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 09:37256+1
8 Aug 2026, 09:18255no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:18255first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
64.1%
avg views ÷ 256 subscribers
Avg views / post
164
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (24 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total3,282
Reactions total86
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 09:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 05s
Average length
1m 05s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

86 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3540.7%
🔥1820.9%
😁1820.9%
🤣1112.8%
22.33%
👍22.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC124 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Introducing Advanced NS Kernel Flasher⚡ Automatically backup current boot and dtbo partitions Automatically installs Metamodule (if not installed) Automatic Kernel Modules Update https://github.com/sreeshankark/android_kernel_oneplus_avicii/commit/7712fb8181742c0d6c6ccdf18d74ce015c9a9100

🔥63

Signed 𝐒𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐤𝐚𝐫 🇮🇳

2 Aug 2026, 07:44 UTC140 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://www.reddit.com/r/Vivo/comments/1vcr7l8/urgent_google_has_silently_banned_contactless/?share_id=bXLr8UGVVVUJNvjwTSAjx&utm_content=1&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_source=share&utm_term=1 PSA 🚨

Signed Anurag Anand

1 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC84 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @techleakszonePhoto

BREAKING: Google will restrict 3rd party apps from checking whether ADB over USB and Developer Options are enabled on the device Google has added a commit which says: Add redactedValue for ADB_ENABLED and DEVELOPMENT_SETTINGS_ENABLED The description of the commit notes: We update ADB_ENABLED and DEVELOPEMENT_SETTINGS_ENABLED to have a redactedValue of 0, since this information is not important for the third-party a

5

Signed 𝐒𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐤𝐚𝐫 🇮🇳

1 Aug 2026, 05:55 UTC134 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁5

Signed $°[-]!+ 🇮🇳 🪳

30 Jul 2026, 15:19 UTC165 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

By @sreeshankar_k 😁

😁6

Signed 𝐒𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐤𝐚𝐫 🇮🇳

30 Jul 2026, 13:23 UTC107 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AxionOS_androidPhoto

By @sachit_124 😁 Y'all should checkout with SpaceX for booking 💃

🤣3

Signed 𝐒𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐤𝐚𝐫 🇮🇳

30 Jul 2026, 01:33 UTC160 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

I have added /ask command to the bot. You can ask your queries, or tell your issues to AOSP dude using this command instead of tagging, this command will work for quoting a message, so if you need to give an answer to someone else's issue or query just quote that message with this command. Also the persona building is still wip so there may be some issues in response. I will build an entire persona for the bot to mat

5

Signed 𝐒𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐤𝐚𝐫 🇮🇳

29 Jul 2026, 12:33 UTC103 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AxionOS_androidPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥3

Signed 𝐒𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐤𝐚𝐫 🇮🇳

29 Jul 2026, 02:39 UTC108 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AxionOS_androidPhoto

Me by @Localhorst404 🙂‍↕️

🤣5

Signed 𝐒𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐤𝐚𝐫 🇮🇳 ("");

29 Jul 2026, 01:37 UTC98 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AxionOS_androidPhoto

By @Localhorst404 ☺️

😁4

Signed 𝐒𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐤𝐚𝐫 🇮🇳 ("");

28 Jul 2026, 17:11 UTC99 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AxionOS_androidPhoto

Made by @Localhorst404 😂😂

2

Signed 𝐒𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐤𝐚𝐫 🇮🇳 ("");

28 Jul 2026, 17:11 UTC105 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AxionOS_android

Unfortunately the v2.8 release is postponed " we don't know when it will be released " Definitely not this week... Due to Real life Work stuff ... Meanwhile we can post some good funny memes and laugh together? 😁 Y'all also can make and send memes if they are relatable and good i will post them

👍2

Signed 𝐒𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐤𝐚𝐫 🇮🇳 ("");

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sanjusprjktupdates. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 546,716 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sanju's Prjkt - Updates” (@sanjusprjktupdates), 256 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sanjusprjktupdates.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.