Channel
@sandro_crimea
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,115subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001552078047 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sandro_crimea |
| Created | 28 September 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sandro_crimea |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 3,115 | +8 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 3,107 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:21 | 3,106 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 3,106 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (22 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,631 |
| Reactions total | 132 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
93 reactions across 5 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 32 | 34.4% | |
| 👍 | 23 | 24.7% | |
| 🔥 | 21 | 22.6% | |
| 🙏 | 8 | 8.60% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 5.38% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 2.15% | |
| 🥴 | 2 | 2.15% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 132reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Наш автомобиль для мобильной огневой группы уже в Судаке! Всё получилось, местные! Сегодня 6 августа доставлен в Судак, принимало пикап руководство города и военные, которым этот "Amarok" предоставлен для специального переоборудования, вооружения и выполнения задач по защите мирного неба над округом, жителей и объектов. Вчера 5 августа народный сбор был закрыт, мы сразу же выехали за автомобилем, к нему дополнитель…
🔥14👍1🤣1
Жаррра! Август у моря. Вечерний пляж. Летняя открытка 2026 года из города Судак, из Крыма #яZдесьживу
❤9👍2🤔2
Сбор на пикап закрыт! 1 693 013 рублей. Город Судак, запомни этот день 5 августа - у нас всех вместо получилось собрать необходимую сумму для покупки автомобиля-пикапа - для мобильной огневой группы Судака. Великое дело получилось у жителей нашего города, всех добрых людей, друзей, знакомых и не знакомых. Вот это то, что называется - сообщество. Неравнодушные. За город и мирное небо над побережьем! #ГоворитСудак Ав…
👍13❤10🔥7🤣2
1 430 096 рублей. Такая сумма средств собрана на сегодня 4 августа для покупки автомобиля-пикапа в мобильную огневую группу нашего города Судак. На фото - тот самый пикап, который и будет приобретён, оформлен и подготовлен специалистами для выполнения задач. Его стоимость - 1 690 000 рублей. Сбор продолжается. Всё открыто, честно, во благо. Всё согласовано, всё под контролем. Спасибо всем огромное за взаимодействи…
🙏8🤣2👍1
Пасмурно в жарком июле у моря. Судакская бухта. Вообще - вот это июльский полдень в серии картинок, обеденное время, высокий курортный сезон и здесь же дождь собирается. Ожидается и штормовой ветер. Лето 2026 года в нашем городе Судак, в Крыму #яZдесьживу
❤13👍6🥴2
Небо на дождь - над городом и морем. Открытка жаркого июля в Судакской бухте. Лето 2026 года в Судаке, в Крыму #яZдесьживу
Пляж. Вечер. Берега. Серия открыток жаркой бухты Капсель у мыса Меганом. Море нагрелось. Лето в Крыму #яZдесьживу
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @sandro_crimea. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 233,705 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сандро Крымский Репортаж” (@sandro_crimea), 3,115 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sandro_crimea.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.