Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

СЭМ АНДЕРС | СЭММИ

@samy_anders

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,639subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001649229731
TypeChannel
Username@samy_anders
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/samy_anders

Growth

1,6371,6391,6387 August 2026 — 1,638 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,637 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,639 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,637–1,639 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 00:421,639+2
8 Aug 2026, 06:061,637-1
7 Aug 2026, 09:471,638first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.7%
avg views ÷ 1,639 subscribers
Avg views / post
552
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held19 (19 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total10,491
Reactions total870
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

870 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥29934.4%
26630.6%
🔥16118.5%
custom 533487733619191749014416.6%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 870reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC293 views58 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

47 глава доступна на Литрес ⏺Никриты. Возвращение Важно! К сожалению, не успеваю подготовить для вас 48 главу, так что встретимся с героями после 10 числа. Точную дату выхода главы скажу в начале следующей недели❤️

❤‍🔥3613custom 53348773361919174909

4 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC293 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @eksmofreedomPhoto

Вы спрашивали, надеялись и ждали. И, наконец, мы готовы поделиться с вами потрясающей новостью ❤️ Мы вовсю готовимся к выходу долгожданного подарочного издания спиноффов «Изгнанник Ардена» и «Принцесса Ардена» — «Судьбы Ардена». Сейчас книга проходит последние этапы подготовки, и совсем скоро мы сможем показать вам, какой она получилась. 🦋Роскошное оформление, детали, которые хочется рассматривать, яркие арты и нез

❤‍🔥11🔥7custom 53348773361919174906

1 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC487 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Немного новостей😌 🆔с 5 по 10 августа новых глав не будет, так как я уезжаю в мини отпуск. Постараюсь совсем уж про книги не забывать, чтобы быстро порадовать вас главами после возвращения. 🆔до этого времени я выложу одну главу Банстрефа и минимум две главы Никритов. 🆔я доработала план второй части Ночных драконов до конца. Если ничего не поменяется, нас ждет 7 глав. 🆔после завершения второй части драконов, дилоги

24❤‍🔥14🔥8custom 53348773361919174902

31 Jul 2026, 20:14 UTC505 views62 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

– Сколько... Сколько ты думала, прежде чем взять его? Грейс слабо улыбнулась, подойдя к Джул. – Я сразу взяла десять. 46 глава доступна на Литрес ⏺Никриты. Возвращение

34🔥18custom 53348773361919174907❤‍🔥3

30 Jul 2026, 09:36 UTC529 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026

По техническим причинам 46 глава сегодня не выйдет! Приношу свои извинения. Выход переносится на завтра (выйдет глава поздно)

27❤‍🔥11custom 533487733619191749010

29 Jul 2026, 14:16 UTC537 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026

46 глава ориентировочно выйдет завтра. Готовьтесь. Самое «весёлое» только начинается😌

24❤‍🔥14custom 53348773361919174905

28 Jul 2026, 19:27 UTC616 views63 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

– Я либо умру там, либо добуду это чертово лекарство. 45 глава доступна на Литрес ⏺Никриты. Возвращение

35❤‍🔥18custom 53348773361919174907🔥3

28 Jul 2026, 15:14 UTC553 views55 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Редактирую 45 главу (если очень повезёт, ждём ее сегодня, но поздно!). И как жаль, что посты в телеграме нельзя красиво оформлять с музыкой. Вы бы урыдались, потому что некоторые треки прям так хорошо передают боль из следующих глав🥹

custom 533487733619191749031❤‍🔥177

26 Jul 2026, 12:48 UTC659 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Убить героя или нет?

  1. Убивай👻24%
  2. Пощади 🙇‍♂️76%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8

26 Jul 2026, 10:09 UTC623 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Глава Драконов может (но это не точно) задержаться до завтрашнего дня. У меня сломался телефон, пока не могу восстановить доступ на Литнет. Новую главу Никритов ориентировочно ждём во вторник-среду

❤‍🔥27🔥6custom 53348773361919174905

25 Jul 2026, 15:45 UTC650 views72 reactionsread 7 August 2026

До конца книги в оригинальной версии осталось 5 глав. Думаю, что в новой версии их будут чуть больше, потому что последние главы с битвой, как всегда, очень большие. Некоторые, возможно, придётся поделить. Может и не придётся. Посмотрю по ходу действия. Но самое важное не это! Самое важное, что мы постепенно приближаемся к завершению второй части. Мне так волнительно, словно я пишу книгу впервые. Немного страшно пр

🔥40❤‍🔥1810custom 53348773361919174904

25 Jul 2026, 15:42 UTC580 views60 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

44 глава доступна на Литрес ⏺Никриты. Возвращение

🔥3313custom 53348773361919174909❤‍🔥5

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @samy_anders. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Jul 2026, 12:48 UTCAnonymous Poll233 voters

Убить героя или нет?

  1. Убивай👻24%
  2. Пощади 🙇‍♂️76%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Jul 2026, 14:30 UTCAnonymous Poll191 voters

Сейчас вы читаете Никритов первый раз или перечитываете?

  1. Первый23%
  2. Перечитываю77%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 773,790 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“СЭМ АНДЕРС | СЭММИ” (@samy_anders), 1,639 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/samy_anders.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.