5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,713–2,736 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 16:53
2,733
+7
9 Aug 2026, 13:02
2,726
+4
6 Aug 2026, 23:24
2,722
+6
6 Aug 2026, 05:18
2,716
no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:53
2,716
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
42.4%
avg views ÷ 2,733 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,160
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
13 (23 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
15,080
Reactions total
458
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 46s
Average length
1m 55s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
423 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
166
39.2%
🔥
122
28.8%
👍
101
23.9%
😁
27
6.38%
🤣
4
0.946%
❤🔥
2
0.473%
🤮
1
0.236%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 458reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 13 we hold a reading for · 23%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @samsonova_v_serbii. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
7.69%
1 of 13 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
650
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
813
over 12 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Два главных блюда в «Белой Ладье»
Сегодня на Негошева, 5 стоит полуразрушенное здание. Но когда-то внутри него была невероятно популярная кафана у жителей Нови-Сада. Она работала примерно с 1812 до 1953. В 1948 здание национализировали, и кафана вскоре закрылась.
В «Ладье» собирался цвет сербского общества Нови-Сада, и считается, что именно там Нови-Сад впервые назвали Сербскими Афинами.
О двух главных блюдах, кот…
Куда съездить в августе недалеко от Нови-Сада
Осталось ещё три недели лета, и хочется ещё что-то успеть. И вот вам мои рекомендации:
🔸Ковиль — зоопарк, аисты, монастырь. На нас огромное впечатление произвел зоопарк, который держит неравнодушная семья. Вход бесплатный, только пожертвования по желанию. Можно кататься на пони, трогать, кормить и гладить животных. Еще нас угощали домашним соком, рассказывали про спасен…
Мой старший ребенок заработал свои первые деньги в 7 лет. Дочь в 7 лет начала заниматься программированием онлайн, а мужу на работе нужно было в презентации показать то, что может сделать ребёнок. И она в Scratch создала несложную программку.
Это был первый маленький успех, и осознание, что за гаджетами можно проводить время с пользой.
И онлайн-школа программирования Айти Сэм может научить этому ваших детей.
С пер…
Кто такой «битанга»?
Прочитала это слово в сербском романе «Комо» и заинтересовалась что оно означает.
Оказалось, что это распространённое слово в сербском. Значения такие: пройдоха, бродяга, разгильдяй, хулиган, проходимец, человек с сомнительной репутацией.
«Битанга» может звучать и как оскорбление и по-дружески — зависит от контекста.
Например:
On je bitanga — Он тот еще прохвост
Mala bitanga! — Ах ты, маленьк…
Лучшее за июль
В июле меня охватило отвратительное чувство. Когда ты ждал-ждал, и вот оно, казалось бы, пришло время для отдыха, а…отдохнуть ты не можешь.
Приходишь в парк, и нет бы вдыхать запахи свежескошенной травы и вслушиваться в пение птиц. Вместо этого твою голову осаждают мысли. Хук слева — а кто будет посты писать? Хук справа — а кто проекты будет делать? Удар под дых — сербский не практикуется, обед не пр…
Стартап из Сербии получил одну из самых престижных мировых наград в области дизайна.
Команда молодых изобретателей из Чачака получила международную премию за многофункциональную детскую кроватку, которая «растет» вместе с ребенком.
Идея родилась из опыта одного из изобретателей: будущие родители не смогли найти модель кроватки, которая идеально бы им подходила.
И решили создать свою.
В результате родилась модульн…
10 вещей, которые летом скажет каждый серб
Мой сосед на вопрос: «Kako si?» отвечает: «Čekam septembar».
И вот ещё фразы, которые часто можно услышать от сербов летом. Особенно сейчас:
🔸Nije što je vruće, nego što je sparina.
Дело не в жаре, а в духоте
🔸— Kako se rashlađuješ?
— Pivom.
— A kad bude još toplije?
— Onda ćemo duplo više piva piti.
— Как охлаждаешься?
— Пивом
— А когда станет еще жарче?
— Будем пить в…
Он говорит, что я напоминаю ему актера. Я решил, что Джорджа Клуни из-за седых висков. А он ответил: «Маленького толстого Зорана из “Тито и я”.
🔜Про фильм «Тито и я»
Вчера я впервые побывала на сербском стендапе и осталась в восторге. Во-первых, потому что поняла 80% шуток, во-вторых, было живо, эмоционально, артистично, в-третьих, это для меня обратная связь, что не зря я веду этот канал, смотрю фильмы и сериалы н…
Первый Макдак в Югославии
24 марта 1988 года в Белграде произошло невероятное событие — в Югославии открылся первый McDonald’s.
И не только в Югославии, но и первый в центральной и юго-восточной Европе и в целом коммунистическом мире. В Москве Макдак открылся в 1990, в Румынии — в 1995.
Макдак открылся на площади Славия, и это был такой ажиотаж, что полиции даже пришлось регулировать толпу и движение транспорта.
…
Мы это сделали!
Пару лет назад перед слетом туристят, который проходит на Фрушке два раза в год, мы купили палатку, спальники и все, что нужно для отдыха на природе.
Но тогда не все прошло идеально. Я ужасно спала, были комары, дети испугались змеи, которую поймали в лагере, было очень много людей.
После этого палатку с матрасами и спальниками мы использовали исключительно дома в развлекательных целях.
Но этим ле…
Мой друг Денис — и человек талантливый, и говорит хорошо, и контент интересный снимает. А энергия у него такая, что согреет, захватит и поведёт за собой.
Поэтому, когда он предложил мне снять подкаст, я не смогла отказаться.😁
Хотя и было жутко страшно — ну не люблю я себя на видео! Максимум с 30 дубля. А тут с одного. Или пан, или пропал. Но кто мы такие, чтобы не идти в страх и отсиживаться в норе?!
Субъективный …
Majmuni, bre
Pička materina
Lopta vaša, jebote
Ajde, Voša!
Napred!
Šta radiš, bre
Jebem tvoju glavu
Vojvodina, Novi Sad
Jebem ti mamu
Kurac! (в отношении судьи)
Ne rade ništa celu utakmicu
Jebem ti materinu pičku
Idioti!
Вот в принципе и весь словарный запас, который вам нужно иметь на футболе в Нови-Саде.😅
Да, вчера я впервые была на футболе в Сербии — Воеводина играла против голландского Аякса. Проиграли 1:4. Спа…
❤15👍9🔥6🤣4😁3
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @samsonova_v_serbii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 299,474 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@samsonova_v_serbii named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@fmimagesbalkans named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Самсонова в Сербии” (@samsonova_v_serbii), 2,733 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/samsonova_v_serbii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.