Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SAMIA ALSHRAFI

Channel

SAMIA ALSHRAFI

@samiaalshrafi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

7,256subscribers

-52 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001679328127
TypeChannel
Username@samiaalshrafi
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded26 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/samiaalshrafi

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7,2567,3087,28226 August 2026 — 7,308 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,308 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,290 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,282 subscribers6 September 2026 — 7,266 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,256 subscribers26 August 202611 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 16 days, net -52. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,248–7,316 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 00:367,256-10
6 Sept 2026, 09:197,266-16
2 Sept 2026, 05:127,282-8
29 Aug 2026, 19:257,290-18
26 Aug 2026, 06:007,308no change
26 Aug 2026, 05:457,308first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 2 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.24%
avg views ÷ 7,256 subscribers
Avg views / post
598
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.836%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held17 (2 February 202622 August 2026)
Views total598
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

183 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
16389.1%
🔥147.65%
👏52.73%
😱10.546%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 183 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 2 February 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 09:24 UTC598 views5 reactionsread 26 August 2026

أول محاضرة من الكورس المدفوع لصناعة قصص و فيديوهات الاطفال ب ai .. بس هاتتحذف من القناة .. فتقدروا تشوفوها قبل الحذف https://youtu.be/c9BgjPgqVdk

5

6 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC972 views13 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video

بدكم طريقة تحويل صوركم لشخصية كرتونية و تخلوها تتكلم عنكم ؟ خبروني بالتعليقات 👇🏻 https://youtube.com/shorts/0iBiMI7c860?si=jFLuJ6AAnHjVAPnT

12👏1

1 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC≈1,200 views21 reactionsread 26 August 2026

تهورت و قررت اخد خطوة بمجال دراستي و افتح صيدلية 👩‍⚕️🫢 بانتظار دعمكم للصفحة 💙 https://www.instagram.com/p/Dbf760To1y-/?igsh=aGY0M2xwcWRybGI0

15🔥5😱1

17 Jul 2026, 07:31 UTC≈1,690 views8 reactionsread 26 August 2026

أفضل موقع مجاني لإزالة خلفية الصور بدقة خرافية #ai https://youtube.com/shorts/ACwKbTAFZfo?feature=share

8

13 Jul 2026, 08:38 UTC≈1,520 views7 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Poll

بتحبوا الفيديوهات الجاية تكون 👀

  1. ريلز قصيرة17%
  2. شروحات مُفصلة86%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

7

13 Jul 2026, 08:37 UTC≈1,330 views4 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Poll

شو البرامج يلي حابين نركز عليها بالفيديوهات الجاية ؟👀

  1. CANVA40%
  2. CAPCUT25%
  3. ALIGHT MOTION11%
  4. كُلهم40%

The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

4

12 Jul 2026, 08:30 UTC≈1,350 views8 reactionsread 26 August 2026

هذا التأثير سيجعل فيديوهاتك تبدو احترافية جدًا #ai #capcut https://youtube.com/shorts/oh77nuM_LtI?feature=share

5🔥3

11 Jul 2026, 09:52 UTC≈1,190 views5 reactionsread 26 August 2026

حوّل اسمك إلى توقيع فاخر بالذكاء الاصطناعي خلال ثوانٍ✍️ #gemini #ai https://youtube.com/shorts/uyfoQ7qSej0?feature=share

5

30 Jun 2026, 07:10 UTC≈3,250 views6 reactionsread 26 August 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/IW4BfQyqHpc?si=eeLqQkEuabrNB0Rq

6

28 Jun 2026, 05:40 UTC≈3,070 views9 reactionsread 26 August 2026

عُدنا 🫢🔥 https://youtube.com/shorts/0fijdOZMQX4?si=0sYX3AzQ0gWR5zvA

5👏3🔥1

11 Apr 2026, 12:55 UTC≈4,750 views17 reactionsread 26 August 2026

ورشة مجانية لتعلم المونتاج باستخدام الموبايل 📍العدد محدود و الاولوية لمن يسجل اولا https://www.facebook.com/share/187Hiz29ZA/?mibextid=wwXIfr

13🔥4

9 Apr 2026, 12:24 UTC≈4,660 views16 reactionsread 26 August 2026

دورة مجانية لتعلم التصميم بالموبايل 📍العدد محدود والاولوية لمن يسجل اولاً https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1Ge5LyR1de/?mibextid=wwXIfr

16

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @samiaalshrafi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Jul 2026, 08:38 UTCAnonymous Poll95 voters

بتحبوا الفيديوهات الجاية تكون 👀

  1. ريلز قصيرة17%
  2. شروحات مُفصلة86%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

13 Jul 2026, 08:37 UTCAnonymous Poll115 voters

شو البرامج يلي حابين نركز عليها بالفيديوهات الجاية ؟👀

  1. CANVA40%
  2. CAPCUT25%
  3. ALIGHT MOTION11%
  4. كُلهم40%

The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 2 February 2026 to 22 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SAMIA ALSHRAFI” (@samiaalshrafi), 7,256 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/samiaalshrafi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.