📱 | Так, а реакции в знак благодарности за рекомендации будут или я для кого стараюсь?)))
custom 52559580036176547116custom 53572501944989446545custom 52557432595478138143

Channel
@salvatores_magic
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
293subscribers
-21 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002217668268 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @salvatores_magic |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/salvatores_magic |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 09:21 | 293 | -6 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:01 | 299 | -7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:54 | 306 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 305 | -5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:06 | 310 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 314 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 314 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
88 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5255958003617654711 | 39 | 44.3% | |
| custom 5292141062976992380 | 24 | 27.3% | |
| custom 5388830766903896582 | 12 | 13.6% | |
| custom 5357250194498944654 | 7 | 7.95% | |
| custom 5255743259547813814 | 6 | 6.82% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 88 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📱 | Так, а реакции в знак благодарности за рекомендации будут или я для кого стараюсь?)))
custom 52559580036176547116custom 53572501944989446545custom 52557432595478138143
— Для девочек, которым интересен кератин/ботокс/холодное восстановление 🙍♂️
custom 52559580036176547115
t.me/+H2AwdnvPnURiN2My
custom 52559580036176547115
— Для тех, кто хотел бы побыть моделью на качественном маникюре 🥴
custom 52559580036176547115
https://t.me/fedotovnails
Мой опыт и мнение касательно RSL-массажа 🤩
custom 52559580036176547114
Sticker, posted without a caption
Девочки, СПБ 🫶🏻 От всей души, кстати, советую эту студию)) И мастера лазерной эпиляции - Софью
custom 52559580036176547114
Ищем модель🔎 На RSL-массаж (45 минут) 3 августа в 16:00 | бесплатно Пишите «+», кто хочет
custom 53888307669038965821
— Меня вообще очень в последнее время потянуло на всякие прикольные макияжи, но с учетом всех идей, которые я хочу реализовать - мне нужно очень много инструментов Еще заказала макро линзу для красивых фото, смотрю всякие обучалки по съемке видео/ расположению света🪐
custom 52559580036176547115
Posted without readable text
custom 52557432595478138143
Кстаааати, небольшое дополнение: по идее, если у вас нет теней, можно спокойно заменить эту историю помадой))
custom 52921410629769923804
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @salvatores_magic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“• Магия Сальваторе 💋” (@salvatores_magic), 293 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/salvatores_magic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.