다팔았음 삼성전자로 하루만에 20%를 먹어보네
❤29
Signed Salt

Channel
@saltalpha
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,980subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003020050059 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @saltalpha |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/saltalpha |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:41 | 2,980 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 2,981 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 2,981 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (13 July 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 34,400 |
| Reactions total | 273 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 00:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
327 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 274 | 83.8% | |
| 🔥 | 36 | 11.0% | |
| 💯 | 17 | 5.20% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 327reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
다팔았음 삼성전자로 하루만에 20%를 먹어보네
❤29
Signed Salt
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤16
Signed Salt
Photo, posted without a caption
❤12💯3🔥3
Signed Salt
이거 언제 멈추나요?
🔥7❤1
Signed 박프로
지인중 주식 고수가 사라고 하기도 하고 기다리던 자리 찍었길래 삼전만 조금 사봤음 👀
❤24
Signed Salt
오냐? 난 준비됐어
❤17🔥3
Signed Salt
좋은 글은 아니지만 실제로 저와 정말 친하고, 좋은 사람이라는 것에 제 전재산을 걸 수 있는 사람의 일이라서 공유 했습니다.
❤12
Signed Salt
지인들이 이사람 말 듣고 저를 오해하고 해도 저는 걍 먼저 연락 한통 안 했어요 차피 그말 하는 애나 그말 듣고 믿는 내나 거기서 거기고, 일로 만난 사이인데 좆목질 할 필요 없잖아요 가족이 먼저지
❤6
Signed Salt
저는 당신처럼 횡령도 안하고 정치질 안했어도 하리에서 60만불은 굴리는데 명품 좀 줄이시지… 사치가 너무 심하니까 남에 돈에 욕심이 나죠…
❤3
Signed Salt
자기 한국 비디들을 친조카(CS) 코드 만들어서 그 아래다가 꽂아버리고… 나한테 걸리니까 하는 말이 “조카네 집안이 최근에 집을 사서 힘들어… ㅆㅂㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 집사서 힘들면 한국 비디들 몰래 코드 파서 조카 밑으로 넣어줘도 되는건가요? 제가 알았으니 다 원상복구 했지 ㅋㅋ 비디들은 아직도 이사실 모르죠? 왜냐면 당신이 저에 대해 말도 안되는 말들로 제 지인들에게 모함하는 동안 전 걍 입닫고 제 할일 했거든요…
💯6❤1
Signed Salt
지 실적 때문에 지인들 돈을 스테이킹에 묶으라고 한다? 그리고 거래소는 출금도 안됨 지인을 돈으로 보면 안되죠 착한척은 다하더니
❤7
Signed Salt
썩은물이 고이면 어케 되는지 보여주는 최고의 사례임 할 말은 존나 많지만 참겠음. 자기가 오너도 아니면서 한국에서 적당히 가족경영해야지 한국지사가 회사 망하게 했다 해도 과언이 아님 끝
💯7
Signed Salt
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @saltalpha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“솔트&프로 꺾이지 않는 마음” (@saltalpha), 2,980 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/saltalpha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.