Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for салон_или_или | salon_ili_ili

Channel

салон_или_или | salon_ili_ili

@salon_ili_ili

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

11,653subscribers

+90 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001701040022
TypeChannel
Username@salon_ili_ili
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/salon_ili_ili

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,56311,66311,6137 August 2026 — 11,563 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,563 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,567 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,577 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,578 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,584 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,588 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,607 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,617 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,618 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,617 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,626 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,628 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,622 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,625 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,629 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,636 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,644 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,647 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,649 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,652 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,651 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,648 subscribers6 September 2026 — 11,651 subscribers9 September 2026 — 11,661 subscribers12 September 2026 — 11,663 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,661 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,658 subscribers17 September 2026 — 11,653 subscribers11,6537 August 202617 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 41 days, net +90. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,548–11,678 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 13:3811,653-5
15 Sept 2026, 09:1811,658-3
13 Sept 2026, 20:1611,661-2
12 Sept 2026, 03:0011,663+2
9 Sept 2026, 20:5811,661+10
6 Sept 2026, 15:1711,651+3
4 Sept 2026, 07:3611,648-3
1 Sept 2026, 18:3911,651-1
31 Aug 2026, 17:0811,652+3
30 Aug 2026, 19:0811,649+2
29 Aug 2026, 18:5511,647+3
28 Aug 2026, 22:2611,644+8
28 Aug 2026, 00:2411,636+7
27 Aug 2026, 02:0111,629+4
26 Aug 2026, 00:4611,625+3
25 Aug 2026, 03:0711,622-6
22 Aug 2026, 04:4811,628+2
20 Aug 2026, 22:1111,626+9
19 Aug 2026, 21:0511,617-1
18 Aug 2026, 21:4511,618first reading

Engagement

139 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.3%
avg views ÷ 11,653 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,200
41 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
41
of 139 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 38 of 41 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held139 (6 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total49,184
Reactions total1,528
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 00:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9h 37m
Average length
7m 48s

Measured directly from 74 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,470 reactions across 134 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,42154.2%
🔥1,09524.5%
👍77317.3%
🤩861.92%
🎉400.895%
🥰320.716%
👏230.515%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 135 of the 139 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,470 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 139 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 15:25 UTC838 views33 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Новый невероятный FATTO A MANO 290!

🔥312

2 Sept 2026, 13:53 UTC948 views21 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Baby Yak Lace MYAK + Baby Yak Lace Medium MYAK + PAILLETTES Lang Yarns 🧶

👍165

2 Sept 2026, 13:35 UTC942 views25 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Сочетания из прямого эфира кашемира CLASSIC и новых оттенков PAILLETTES Lang Yarns 🧶

20🔥5

2 Sept 2026, 12:35 UTC≈1,030 views26 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Роскошная поставка Lang Yarns ♡ Пряжа из эфира: - Shirley - Salsa - Spirit - Honor - Paillettes - Infiniti - Move 6ply - Suri Alpaca - Yak - Classic Cardiff Cashmere - Baby Yak Lace MYAK - Baby Yak Medium MYAK Журналы: - Wooladdicts No.17 - Punto Infiniti - Punto Move #эфиры_ИлиИли

21🥰4👍1

2 Sept 2026, 08:41 UTC≈1,130 views40 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Вдохновляюще красивая поставка Lang Yarns ♡

33👍4🤩3

2 Sept 2026, 06:56 UTC≈1,170 views29 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Прямой эфир в 12.00. Присоединяйтесь!

23👍4🔥2

2 Sept 2026, 05:47 UTC≈1,220 views87 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Тихая роскошь - кофточка на пуговках, связанная Катей, менеджером интернет-магазина, из CLASSIC Cardiff Cashmere в совместнике с Ланой Бакаевой. Процесс, за которым мы с удовольствием наблюдали с самых первых петель и результат, который превзошёл все ожидания - идеальная посадка, красивые детали и безупречное исполнение. Катя вязала по первому размеру, расход - 14 мотков CLASSIC (цв.732). Описание кофточки составл

🔥4428👍10👏2🤩2🎉1

1 Sept 2026, 16:14 UTC≈1,360 views53 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

К нам приехали: - Shirley - Spirit - Salsa - Yak - Zen - Super Soxx 4ply - Super Soxx Tweed 6ply - Super Soxx Color 4ply - Vaya - Suri Alpaca - Infinity - Regina - Paillettes - Wooladdicts No.17 - Punto 86 Move - Fatto A Mano 290 и не только 🧶

28🔥16👍9

1 Sept 2026, 15:19 UTC≈1,340 views32 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Распаковываем новую осеннюю поставку Lang Yarns ♡

🔥26🥰51

1 Sept 2026, 11:12 UTC≈1,390 views19 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Конкурс фотографий ваших работ! В течение месяца в комментариях к этой публикации вы сможете добавлять фотографии своих готовых работ и процессов из нашей пряжи или из наших тканей. В последний день месяца мы всей командой выберем 10, на наш взгляд, лучших фотографий. А затем вы проголосуете за ту работу, которая нравится вам! Победительница получит приз - моточек Fior Di Lino MYAK *. Участвуйте! ————— *Стоимост

16👍3

1 Sept 2026, 07:40 UTC≈1,410 views126 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Этот костюм из PER FORTUNA Lana Grossa и Ecopuno Tweed Lana Grossa уже был в нашей ленте, но с удовольствием публикуем его снова и поздравляем ВероникаSвяжет с победой в конкурсе фотографий, а также дарим 2 моточка DK Cardiff Cashmere. Для юбки за основу взято описание из журнала Filati 71, для поло - из Filati 69. Расход Per Fortunа на юбку - 9 мотков, поло - 4 мотка и 2 мотка Ecopuno. Спицы 3.5 мм. Прекрасная ра

77👍25🎉16👏7🔥1

1 Sept 2026, 04:12 UTC≈1,210 views48 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Уже осенний совместник и кардиган крючком в технике ‘бабушкин квадрат’ у Анны Никитиной. В кардигане соединились EDITION 3 Schoppel и PER FORTUNA Lana Grossa. Расход на размер S - 4 мотка Edition 3 и 6 мотков Per Fortuna, крючок 5 мм и спицы 4 мм для планок. Самые разные цветовые сочетания для кардигана - в комментариях, а промокод - в совместнике. Совместник стартует 15 сентября, присоединяйтесь вязать!

29🔥16🤩3

Showing the 12 most recent of 139 posts we hold for @salon_ili_ili. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTCAnonymous Poll151 voters

Подводим итоги конкурса фотографий - выбирайте одну или несколько из 10 и голосуйте! Автору, чья работа наберёт наибольшее количество голосов, мы подарим 2 моточка кашемира DK Cardiff Cashmere!

  1. 138%
  2. 25%
  3. 373%
  4. 42%
  5. 57%
  6. 69%
  7. 711%
  8. 815%
  9. 93%
  10. 1014%

The shares total 177%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 139 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“салон_или_или | salon_ili_ili” (@salon_ili_ili), 11,653 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/salon_ili_ili.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.