2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 101–103 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Aug 2026, 10:02
102
no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:22
102
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 12 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
154
Videos
17
Links
12
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
11m 25s
Average length
1m 54s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
295 reactions across 18 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
75
25.4%
❤
56
19.0%
🤣
23
7.80%
🌚
18
6.10%
👍
17
5.76%
🍌
15
5.08%
custom 6046231719793658991
14
4.75%
🫡
14
4.75%
custom 6033131661518965627
13
4.41%
custom 6035034340621028056
11
3.73%
🤝
10
3.39%
🍓
8
2.71%
😢
6
2.03%
🤡
5
1.69%
💊
4
1.36%
custom 6032692419508571454
2
0.678%
💅
2
0.678%
custom 5258316198361182423
1
0.339%
custom 6033071931408780688
1
0.339%
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 295reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 November 2025 to 13 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❗️Из-за отключения интернета москвичи массово переходят на технологии древних — продажи аналоговых вещей рекордно подскочили
🟠Спрос на пейджеры взлетел на 73%, на рации – на 27%, а на стационарные телефоны – на 25%;
🟠Продажи бумажных карт в книжных магазинах выросли на 50%;
🟠Чаще всего люди берут автомобильные карты Москвы и области, схемы метро и электричек, а также обычные городские атласы.
До связи
Сельдерей маркетинг — это про позиционирование без суеты.
Здесь нет ничего странного — здесь всё четко и по делу. Именно поэтому сюда хочется возвращаться: за атмосферой, за интересными мыслями, за шутками и инсайтами, которые остаются надолго.
Здесь каждый пост с характером.
А если без приколов, кто тоже устал от таких крутых нейросетевых текстов?)
Уже выработали себе "баннерную слепоту" на такие объявления?
Я…
Путем нехитрых математических действий пытливым умам становится открытой следующая информация:
ТОП СТРАН по слитым аккаунтам на 1000 жителей. Это показывает плотность сливов и позволяет сравнивать страны с разным количеством населения.
Готовы?
1) Россия, около 6400 аккаунтов на 1000 жителей
2) Франция, 2300 аккаунтов на 1000 жителей
3) США, меньше 2000 на 1000 жителей.
Что это значит? это значит, что на одного тебя…
С днем выдачи обоссаных штанов, друзья
Я даже текст раскрашивать не буду. Кому надо, тот дочитает.
Меня очень сильно триггерит вся эта ситуёвина с блокировками. Причем не из-за самого факта, а из-за отсутствия ответа на вопрос "зачем?"
Зачем, всё это? Зачем?
Причем, никто этого не понимает. Ни пользователи, ни авторы контента, ни бизнес. Да и бюджетники тоже не понимают.
Зачем пользователям идти в какой-то недод…
Какой нейронкой для генерации текста ты пользуешься?
Grock3%
ChatGPT42%
Qwen6%
DeepSeek32%
YandexGPT13%
GigaChat13%
Gemini6%
другой19%
The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Такое вчера-сегодня делаль для @aviamagadan
Использовано 3.5 нейросети, капкуты эти ваши и часов 5 времени🫠
13.5/93
🔥12🍌5❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @salesdiary_np. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой нейронкой для генерации текста ты пользуешься?
Grock3%
ChatGPT42%
Qwen6%
DeepSeek32%
YandexGPT13%
GigaChat13%
Gemini6%
другой19%
The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 November 2025 to 13 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сельдерей | Дневник продаж” (@salesdiary_np), 102 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/salesdiary_np.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
