Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 63 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 131–141 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Oct 2026, 12:40
140
+2
29 Sept 2026, 09:00
138
+1
15 Sept 2026, 23:20
137
+1
9 Sept 2026, 04:17
136
+1
30 Aug 2026, 23:25
135
+1
16 Aug 2026, 15:45
134
+2
9 Aug 2026, 00:46
132
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:43
132
first reading
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
67 reactions across 6 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5251220611740491037
21
31.3%
custom 5244974659845260417
20
29.9%
custom 5276412231314055303
8
11.9%
custom 5242249704959395592
6
8.96%
😱
5
7.46%
custom 5244512542839051833
4
5.97%
😭
2
2.99%
custom 5427255283795640902
1
1.49%
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 6 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @salem_tattoo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 6 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 24 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ну что ж. Отчитываюсь!
Ситуацию имеем внезапно следующую:
Позавчера меня сильно цапнул за руку кот, похоже, повредил сухожилие на запястье.
Куснул глубоко, хотя ранка с виду довольно маленькая. Распухло так, как будто меня укусила, как минимум, ящерица с легким намеком на ядовитость.
Хорошо, что у меня есть люди, способные запугать убедить в том, что нужно лечиться.
Второй день хожу с подвязанной рукой на косыночке,…
Короче!
Ближе к телу, как говорится😏
🥀Во дворце Топкапы собрана большая коллекция нарядов Султанов. Они были еще теми модниками! Любили яркие ткани, блестящие фасоны. Чем больше ткани, тем роскошнее.
🥀Но один предмет одежды, как правило, был не для посторонних глаз.
🥀Если курды, чтобы избавить себя от дурного, делали на теле татуировки, то мусульманам это было запрещено. Но защищаться ведь как-то надо, правильно?…
💌А что меня натолкнуло на мысли о татуировках и Османах, так это поход во дворец Топкапы в Стамбуле.
✨Я вообще терпеть не могу туристические достопримечательности и обхожу их десятой дорогой. Не люблю толпу, не люблю завышенные цены, не люблю очереди.
✨В прошлую мою поездку в Стамбул я ходила куда и как хотела. В этот раз с родителями получилось иначе. Они у меня оба историки, люди очень образованные и увлеченные д…
Так вот.
🤩У курдов была традиция нанесения рисунков на ЖЕНСКОЕ тело, называемая «Дек». Она насчитывает уже более 10 тысяч лет.
🤩Такие татуировки носили исключительно сакральный смысл, каждый символ имел свое значение. Ромб - плодородие, солнце - защиту, крест - единство стихий. Татуировки наносили чаще всего на лицо (между бровей), на руки, на шею. Так защищали от сглаза, от болезней, от злых духов.
🤩У меня вызвал…
Пока писала этот пост, листала фото в галерее, задумалась о том, были ли вообще татуировки в Турции времен Османов.
📖И у меня вам однозначный ответ: а татуировки были вообще всегда. И везде. С начала времен.
📖Дело в том, что татуировки чаще всего наносились на тело как обереги, сокральные символы, отражающие верования, традиции и взгляды людей.
📖В свое время распространение религии (в частности христианизация, мус…
🤩июнь вообще выдался очень насыщенным, как на работу, так и на личные дела.
🤩В начале месяца я потащила родителей в Турцию и в Черногорию, потому что я там уже была и мне хотелось, чтобы они тоже увидели красоту городов, которые видела я, своими глазами.
🤩Это путешествие было не из легких, потому что многочасовые пересадки, смена аэропортов, задержки и переносы рейсов, бесконечные автобусы, трансферы. Это был не то…
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @salem_tattoo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“МАМ, ЭТО ВРЕМЕННАЯ” (@salem_tattoo), 140 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/salem_tattoo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
