Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🎄. love—letter ’s|@tqekun ˚ . 상.

Channel

🎄. love—letter ’s|@tqekun ˚ . 상.

@salcary

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002391868360
TypeChannel
Username@salcary
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 15 December 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/salcary

Growth

676.513 August 2026 — 7 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6 subscribers13 August 202628 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 14 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6–7 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 01:566-1
14 Aug 2026, 07:567no change
13 Aug 2026, 15:467first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 15 December 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

353 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 61566370796577786904613.0%
custom 61568264361759251334512.7%
custom 61564876577455509034412.5%
custom 53820474802401529074312.2%
custom 52336182079688629313911.0%
custom 52332162677494334193810.8%
custom 52333072781064361143810.8%
custom 5235794433538006661329.07%
custom 5233671933714769359205.67%
custom 615665970984046186582.27%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 353reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 December 2024 to 25 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 18 we hold a reading for · 39%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @salcary. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 December 2024 to 25 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Jan 2025, 18:00 UTCviews —

🎄. love—letter ’s|@tqekun ˚ . 상. pinned «ㅤ ㅤ𐙚 ׄ ִ ׄ 𝐌𝐀𝐆𝐍𝐄𝐓𝐈𝐂 ׁ ֢ 🥛 𝐏𝐀𝐆𝐄 𝐎𝐍𝐄 : ┄─ Before starting the transaction, please pay below according 🥛 to the nominal amount. Make sure you don't make a 🥛 mistake in paying and include proof of payment, crop number and sensor number. 🥛 | ૮꒰ྀི๑•‌◡<๑…»

17 Jan 2025, 23:54 UTC≈1,670 views31 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🥛 𝐅𝐞𝐞 𝐉𝐚𝐬𝐩𝐢𝐧 🥛 1p - 999p : free 1.000 - 1.999 : 10p 2.000 - 2.999 : 20p 3.000 - 3.999 : 30p 4.000 - 4.999 : 40p 5.000 - 5.999 : 50p 6.000 - 6.999 : 60p 7.000 - 7.999 : 70p 8.000 - 8.999 : 80p 9.000 - 9.999 : 90p 10.000 - 14.999 : 100p 15.000 - 19.999 : 150p 20.000 - 24.999 : 200p 25.000 - 29.999 : 250p 30.000 - 34.999 : 300p 35.000 - 39.999 :

custom 52333072781064361144custom 52336182079688629314custom 52336719337147693594custom 53820474802401529074custom 61564876577455509034custom 61566370796577786904custom 61566597098404618654custom 61568264361759251333

17 Dec 2024, 17:04 UTC≈2,070 viewsread 13 August 2026

SCAN LUAR DANA +500p!! GA PAKE HANGUS & GA BAKAL DILAYANI

15 Dec 2024, 06:07 UTC≈2,020 views40 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026

ㅤ ㅤ𐙚 ׄ ִ ׄ 𝐌𝐀𝐆𝐍𝐄𝐓𝐈𝐂 ׁ ֢ 🥛 𝐏𝐀𝐆𝐄 𝐎𝐍𝐄 : ┄─ Before starting the transaction, please pay below according 🥛 to the nominal amount. Make sure you don't make a 🥛 mistake in paying and include proof of payment, crop number and sensor number. 🥛 | ૮꒰ྀི๑•‌◡<๑ ིྀ꒱ა 🤍 ˖ ◌ 𓈈 𐬹 ۫ 𝓠riss ㅤ 💙 ˖ ◌ 𓈈 𐬹 ۫ 𝓓ana ㅤ 💳 ˖ ◌ 𓈈 𐬹 ۫ 𝓢eabank ㅤ 💚 ˖ ◌ 𓈈 𐬹 ۫ 𝓖opay ㅤ ☺️ ˖ ◌ 𓈈 𐬹 ۫ 𝓑ank jago ㅤ 💳 ˖ ◌ 𓈈 𐬹 ۫ 𝓝i

custom 52332162677494334195custom 52333072781064361145custom 52336182079688629315custom 52336719337147693595custom 53820474802401529075custom 61564876577455509035custom 61566370796577786905custom 61568264361759251335

15 Dec 2024, 06:06 UTC≈1,710 views42 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026

On December 25th, the air was filled with warmth. In a small, simple yet cozy house, a beautiful girl in her elegant red dress was busy preparing for the her soft, flowing hair was adorned with—a red ribbon, matching the sparkle of her dress as it caught the light of the christmas tree. In the living room stood a tall, green christmas tree. the girl t.me/tqekun La fille tenait une

custom 52332162677494334196custom 52357944335380066616custom 52333072781064361145custom 52336719337147693595custom 53820474802401529075custom 61564876577455509035custom 61566370796577786905custom 61568264361759251335

15 Dec 2024, 06:05 UTC≈1,390 views40 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52332162677494334195custom 52336182079688629315custom 52336719337147693595custom 52357944335380066615custom 53820474802401529075custom 61564876577455509035custom 61566370796577786905custom 61568264361759251335

15 Dec 2024, 05:48 UTC≈1,130 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🍭🍭🍭🍭🍭🍭🍭🍭

custom 52336182079688629311custom 52336719337147693591custom 53820474802401529071custom 61564876577455509031custom 61566370796577786901custom 61568264361759251331

15 Dec 2024, 05:48 UTC≈1,440 views43 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

ׁ 𓈒^᪲᪲ ᮫ 𓂃 𝓘n her heart, she prayed that this happiness 🍮 would always accompany 𝐍𝐈𝐓𝐑𝐎𝐒𝐄𝐄𝐍 and everyone, 🐻 in every corner of the world, throughout the year. IDC 1 ˖ ۫𓏧 🥛⣠ 𓊆6277875840𓊇 ˖ ۫𓏧 🥛⣠ 𓊆tra:6277875840:nom𓊇 IDC 2 ˖ ۫𓏧 🥛⣠ 𓊆5508573241𓊇 ˖ ۫𓏧 🥛⣠ 𓊆tra:5508573241:𓊇 belongs to @tqekun 🥛 and so, a girl in

custom 61568264361759251337custom 61564876577455509036custom 61566370796577786906custom 52332162677494334195custom 52333072781064361145custom 52336182079688629315custom 53820474802401529075custom 61566597098404618654

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @salcary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 977,051 of 1,628,927entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🎄. love—letter ’s|@tqekun ˚ . 상.” (@salcary), 6 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/salcary.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.