Channel
@sajjed25
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
14,007subscribers
-150 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002212127024 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sajjed25 |
| Description | @oxygen158 بوت التواصل @Saj26bot |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sajjed25 |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:35 | 14,007 | -42 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:26 | 14,049 | -8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 14,057 | -28 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 14,085 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 14,087 | -6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:11 | 14,093 | -51 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 14,144 | -13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:01 | 14,157 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (1 June 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 20,220 |
| Reactions total | 66 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
686 reactions across 21 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 438 | 63.8% | |
| 🤣 | 111 | 16.2% | |
| 💔 | 51 | 7.43% | |
| ❤🔥 | 34 | 4.96% | |
| 🔥 | 31 | 4.52% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 1.46% | |
| 😭 | 6 | 0.875% | |
| 🫡 | 5 | 0.729% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 686reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
دورة حسين الهاشمي الدور الثاني2026 ❣الــجدول (اضغط هنا ) ⭐فصل أول (اضغط هنا ) ⭐فصل ثاني (اضغط هنا ) ⭐فصل ثالث (اضغط هنا ) باقي الافصل مستمرين بتنزيلهن بالكروب ⬇⬇ https://t.me/+cMctLHg8wfdmYTI6 🙂 |أوكسجين اكاديمي @ox2gen
🪙عرض لمدة 4 أيام فقط ينتهي يوم 15/8 إذا تريد تدرس على كورس حسين الهاشمي 2027 وتحتاج أحد يتابعك ويمتحنك ويصححلك حتى المادة ما تتراكم عليك… ✅ المحاضرات كاملة ✅ متابعة مستمرة ومساعدين للأسئلة ✅ تصحيح للواجبات والامتحانات 📝 امتحانات يومية، أسبوعية وتراكمية 📚 واجبات، ملخصات، وزاريات ومراجعات 🎯 متابعة نقاط ضعفك حتى تضبط المادة أول بأول بدل ما تدفع مبالغ توصل لـ 500 ألف دينار… الكورس الكامل داخل أوكسجين أكاديمي بـ45 أ…
❤4
معسكر الفيزياء للدور الثاني2026 ❣أ.مـحـمـدزياد ⭐كل الافصل(اضغط هنا ) 🙂 |أوكسجين اكاديمي @ox2gen
❤7
امتحانات الادب المنهج كامل ❤🔥 الـــدورات الـخــاصـة 2026 الجزء الاول : اضغط هنا ❣الادب الــــحــــديـــــث ❣الــــــشــعر الــّحـــديـث ❣مـدرســة الـــمـــهــجــر ❣شعر القضية الفلسطينيه ❣الحـبـوبي علـي الشـرقي ❣حـافظ ابراهيم وادونـيس ❣ميخائيل نعيمةبدر السياب ❣فدوى طوقان محمود درويش الجزء الثاني : اضغط هنا ❣الـمــسرحــيـة ❣محـمـد علـي الـخـفاجي. ❣الـنثـر و فنـونـه ❣القـصـة الـقصـيرة ❣فؤاد التكرلي ❣الـروايـة ❣ال…
❤1
محاضرات الاستاذ 27 صارن بالمنصة☄️
❤28💔6🔥1
Posted without readable text
❤19
الانفجار الاكبر 2026💥 دورة الدخول الشامل و الدور الثاني المجانية 💯 الادب الجـزء الـثـانـي و الأول الـمــجانيـة🆓 ⌛دور ثاني و ما مكـمل الادب؟ تعال سجل مجانا 💠 ❣منصة خاصة مجانية لطلاب الدورة ❣محاضرات خاصةلكل موضوع ❣تصـحـيـح لـ كل طـالـب ❣متابعه خاصه لكل طالب ❣امتـحانات بكل موضـوع ❣ملخـص قبل كل امتحان ❣اختبارات سـريعة يوميـاً ❣تواصـل مباشر مع نائـب الـلغــة العـربـيـة للتسجيل ارسل اسمك الثلاثي إلى 💠@Saj26b
❤21💔3
🎯دورات الدخول الشامل والدور الثاني – الأستاذ 🦅 ساجد العكــيلي - الاسلامية حسين الهاشمي - الكيمياء حسـين مــحـمد - الفيزياء تعبت من الحفظ وخايف تضيع منك درجة المية بسبب التأجيل؟ هسة صار وكت تضمنها وبأقوى عرض ممكن تشوفه بعمرك! وبسعووور صار بـ 20,000 دينار بسسسس لكل المواد أو 7,500 للمادة الواحدة 🎯ليش هاي الدورة راح تخليك تدخل للوزاري وأنت مطلع الـ 100؟ ♦️ 📚 منهج كامل بـ محاضرات مركزة: تغطية شاملة ومركزة لكل …
❤15🫡1
هاي الدورات ل طلاب الدور الثاني 27 انتو معليكم بيها
💔5😁4
دفعة 26 انصحوهم بالتعليقات خطيه
🤣15💔13😭4❤1
دفعة 27 بلشتوا بالاسلامية؟ جاوبوا هنا https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSCWF2XTW/
💔13❤9🔥2
الأسئلة المرشحة للفيزياء 2026 ❣أ.حســيــن مـحـمـد ⭐ كل فصل و أجوبته(اضغط هنا) 🙂 |أوكسجين اكاديمي @ox2gen @ox2gen
🔥5❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @sajjed25. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,154,986 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“محاضرات ساجد العكيلي2027” (@sajjed25), 14,007 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sajjed25.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.