Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for محاضرات ساجد العكيلي2027

Channel

محاضرات ساجد العكيلي2027

@sajjed25

Not marked by Telegram, checked 11 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,119subscribers

+962 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002212127024
TypeChannel
Username@sajjed25
Description@oxygen158 بوت التواصل @Saj26bot
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 November 2026
Measurements held62
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/sajjed25

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

10,500 average views per post against 15,121 subscribers — an engagement rate of 69.2%. Across the 4,836 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,004–31,619 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 2.98% and 14.2%, with a median of 7.18%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured14 of 14 published in the window (1 exact, 13 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled146,413
Mature posts only74.1% over 13 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers15,121 measured 4 November 2026
Cohortb10000:ara · 4,836 channels · p10 1.05% · p25 2.98% · p50 7.18% · p75 14.2% · p90 25.0%
Position in cohort99.131th percentile · 9.6× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.056% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageArabic · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 4 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

13,52315,23814,380.515,1197 August 202614 November 2026
62 measurements spanning 99 days, net +962. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,266–15,495 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Nov 2026, 08:1415,119+12
11 Nov 2026, 09:2115,107+28
9 Nov 2026, 15:0715,079+7
8 Nov 2026, 06:0815,072-4
6 Nov 2026, 22:1115,076-6
5 Nov 2026, 21:5115,082-39
4 Nov 2026, 21:5115,121+13
3 Nov 2026, 17:5915,108-21
2 Nov 2026, 15:4115,129-3
1 Nov 2026, 15:5615,132-1
31 Oct 2026, 18:0815,133-8
30 Oct 2026, 16:5615,141-9
29 Oct 2026, 17:4815,150-8
28 Oct 2026, 14:5915,158-3
27 Oct 2026, 17:5615,161-22
26 Oct 2026, 14:0515,183-27
25 Oct 2026, 13:1015,210-14
24 Oct 2026, 11:2515,224-3
23 Oct 2026, 11:3715,227-11
22 Oct 2026, 14:5115,238first reading

Engagement

50 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 77 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
50.0%
avg views ÷ 15,119 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,560
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 50 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 November 2026
Posts held50 (1 June 2026 – 15 November 2026)
Views total83,120
Reactions total1,394
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Nov 2026, 20:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
55
Videos
11
Links
136

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

4,356 reactions across 49 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,76540.5%
🤣88520.3%
😭55912.8%
🔥48511.1%
💔3989.14%
❤‍🔥1583.63%
🫡962.20%
😁100.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,356 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 15 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 11 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

15 Nov 2026, 16:51 UTC≈1,420 views36 reactionsread 15 November 2026

شاركوا شبيكم نايمين

🤣24❤‍🔥6🔥6

15 Nov 2026, 16:51 UTC≈1,300 views18 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @ox2genPhoto

ملك هذا الاسبوع راح يربح اي ملزمة من اختيارة توصلة لباب بيتة 💌

❤14😭3💔1

14 Nov 2026, 16:13 UTC≈1,230 views5 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @ox2genPhoto

⏳ اليوم آخر فرصة تلحگ عروض جمعة أوكسجين! عندك تراكم؟ بعدك ممبلّش؟ هسه وقت تبدي وتلحق دراستك 💙 المادة الواحدة بـ25 ألف دينار بس! منهج كامل، ويا متابعة وتصحيح وامتحانات وواجبات حتى تمشي بدراستك على جدول واضح. 🚨 العرض ينتهي اليوم الساعة 12 بالليل!* اختار مادّتك ومدرّسك، ودزّهم إلنا حتى نكمّل تسجيلك 👇 @oxygen158

❤5

14 Nov 2026, 06:13 UTC≈2,660 views37 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @awab_98File

قــرآن «والله تعالى لا يُضيِّع ما تحمَّل عبدُه لأجله».

❤37

12 Nov 2026, 15:26 UTC≈3,990 views3 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @ox2gen

الدورة الالكترونية للاحياء 2027 ❣أ.ســالــم ال منــصــور ⭐ الفصل الاول (اضغط هنا) ⭐الفصل الثاني (اضغط هنا) 🙂 |أوكسجين اكاديمي @ox2gen @ox2gen

❤3

7 Nov 2026, 06:57 UTC≈7,020 views32 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @ox2gen

Posted without readable text

❤22🤣9❤‍🔥1

25 Oct 2026, 18:15 UTC≈12,100 views245 reactionsread 15 November 2026

و الي ميقرا شيصوت؟

🤣161😭43💔18❤17🔥3🫡3

24 Oct 2026, 20:07 UTC≈12,600 views93 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Poll

تعتمدون امتحانات دفعة 26 لو 27؟

  1. 2613%
  2. 2787%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤75🔥7❤‍🔥6🫡5

23 Oct 2026, 19:05 UTC≈13,100 views392 reactionsread 15 November 2026

تفاعلكم عاجبني يمكن نرجع نكمل الدوره المجانيه

❤286😭43🤣25❤‍🔥20🫡10💔7🔥1

22 Oct 2026, 18:32 UTC≈13,700 views271 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

هاي بعدكم ما وصلتو المراجعه و هيج🌟

🤣223❤17😭17💔9🔥5

21 Oct 2026, 13:01 UTC≈14,000 views262 reactionsread 15 November 2026

قِيلَ لِأَحَدِ الحُكَماءِ: مَنْ أَشْقَى النَّاسِ؟ فَقَالَ: مَنْ أَدْرَكَهُ الشِّتَاءُ وَهُوَ سادس

🤣159😭49💔29❤19🔥3🫡3

9 Oct 2026, 20:14 UTC≈19,500 views77 reactionsread 15 November 2026
File

مساء الخير طلابنا الأبطال نرفِق إليكم أسئلة الأمتحان الخاص في أحكام التلاوة و الحديث لمادة التربية الأسلامية مدة الأمتحان 24 ساعه 🕗 يرجى منكم الألتزام بأداء الإمتحان 💡📖 نسأل الله النجاح و التمييز للجميع 🙏🏻✨ أ.ساجد العكيلي. الاجوبه تنرسل هنا @Nabiarabibot

❤66🫡7😭4

Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @sajjed25. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 5 posts on @sajjed25 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
31 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
14 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
4 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
4

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Oct 2026, 20:07 UTCAnonymous Poll2,530 voters approx.

تعتمدون امتحانات دفعة 26 لو 27؟

  1. 2613%
  2. 2787%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 15 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

أ. مصطفى الحافظ
@mbio111 · 76,872
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 August 2026
الانقاذ الاخير
@AII9IA · 35,867
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 31 August 2026
رابط سنتر الوزاري
@Center_Ministerial · 30
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 31 August 2026
ابن كركوك
@GQ_38 · 255,526
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 21 August 2026
شبكة فالكون التعليمية 𖡃
@FDBBB · 36,386
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
الاســتاذ زيـــاد طـــارق
@zeadtariq1233 · 19,446
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 24 September 2026
مفتاح السادس - Sixth Key
@S2SiQ · 70,471
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
دار الاعرجي
@daralaarji · 108,812
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
تسلا للتعليم | Tesla
@TeslaAws · 300,279
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 10 August 2026
الاستاذ جعفر الحسني
@Biojaffar · 88,179
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 August 2026
سجاد العبيدي قناة للدراسة من البداية
@sajjadobaidymoraja · 18,491
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 September 2026
الاستاذ ساجد العگيلي
@Sajid_AlOqailly · 101,340
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
ملخصات سادسيون
@gn_tytu · 42,678
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 5 September 2026
ملخصات السادس 2027
@MMMK_1 · 56,264
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 27 August 2026
شبكة صنّاع الٲمل التعليمية
@IRAQEDU2019 · 93,394
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 August 2026
منتدى المساعد التعليمي
@IraqEduForum · 218,627
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
أَرْشيفُ السّادِسِ
@qlh1l · 26,286
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 September 2026
استاذ علاء السعداوي - اللغة الانكليزية
@alaaigabbar · 62,110
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 August 2026
دفعة 25
@mohammed_alobidi · 28,213
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 6 September 2026
الاستاذ حسين الهاشمي
@hu10000 · 190,220
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
مدرس الأوائل - الاستاذ محمد حسين
@h2moh7 · 20,507
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 September 2026
معهد استاذ عقيل الزبيدي
@aqil_99 · 54,696
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 August 2026
تحفيز | مفتاح السادس
@AM_A27 · 28,815
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 5 September 2026
المتحدي للوزاري || أ.احمد فوزي
@TTTHT · 114,544
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“محاضرات ساجد العكيلي2027” (@sajjed25), 15,119 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sajjed25.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.