Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

كل يوم سؤال وزاري

@sain7i

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

33,764subscribers

+112 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001705939232
TypeChannel
Username@sain7i
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sain7i

Growth

33,63233,76433,69811 August 2026 — 33,652 subscribers12 August 2026 — 33,632 subscribers13 August 2026 — 33,764 subscribers11 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 2 days, net +112. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,612–33,784 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 00:5233,764+132
12 Aug 2026, 01:3233,632-20
11 Aug 2026, 07:4533,652first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.0%
avg views ÷ 33,764 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,750
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held18 (7 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total121,410
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 22:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 22:21 UTC≈5,620 viewsread 12 August 2026

#عاجل انتهت جلسة مجلس الوزراء لهذا اليوم ولم يصدر قرار بخصوص الدخول الشامل. ويبقى طلبة الدخول الشامل بانتظار قرار ينصفهم..

11 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC≈6,740 viewsread 12 August 2026

مجلس الوزراء يعقد جلسته الاعتيادية برئاسة رئيس مجلس الوزراء علي فالح الزيدي..

11 Aug 2026, 15:43 UTC≈7,380 viewsread 12 August 2026

الدخول الشامل | النائبة منى الغرابي : طلبت من رئيس الوزراء إدراج ملفات (الدخول الشامل والامتحان الخارجي وتحسين المعدل) ضمن جدول أعمال مجلس الوزراء..

10 Aug 2026, 21:34 UTC≈6,700 viewsread 12 August 2026

هيج نوع كُلش مهم مِن الاسئلة الوزارية إتطلعوا عليها..

10 Aug 2026, 21:34 UTC≈6,790 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

سؤال وزاري رياضيات ربط الفصل الثاني بالثالث مع الجواب النموذجي..

8 Aug 2026, 18:52 UTC≈7,630 viewsread 12 August 2026

أغلبكم ديكول هيج وصدك الاحياء صارت سهله بسببه ، المهم أريدكم تبلشون وياه الفصل الثاني تره بعده بالبدايه دينزل الكم هسه وصلو محاضره ٥ ف ماعدكم حجه نهائياً..

8 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC≈7,410 viewsread 12 August 2026

- الرساله ؛ صراحه الفصل الثاني صار سهل بسبب محاضرات استاذ مصطفى مو طبيعي شكد شرحه يجننن✨✨

8 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC≈7,540 viewsread 12 August 2026

- الرساله ؛ ايزيييي يخبل الفصل الثاني مو مثل الاول طرگاعة😽😽

8 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC≈7,600 viewsread 12 August 2026

دفعة ٢٧ وصلو للفصل الثاني على طاري الاحياء شلونكم بي ؟ @voicei2bot

8 Aug 2026, 18:38 UTC≈7,450 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @mbio111Photo

◀️الفصل الثاني | الأنسجة | 2027▶️ محاضرة 5️⃣ : https://youtu.be/TjfQ55ZeAh4 💛 أ. مصطفى الحافظ

8 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC≈6,850 viewsread 12 August 2026

#عـاجل ، #الدخول_الشامل لجنة التربية النيابية: لغاية الآن ما زلنا نجهل اسباب عدم إقرار الدخول الشامل رغم موافقة وزارة التربية ومجلس الوزراء لم يوضح موقفه.

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @sain7i. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@sain7i edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 785,032 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“كل يوم سؤال وزاري” (@sain7i), 33,764 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sain7i.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.