🟢 جلسه دوم دوره ورتکس کد هفت 🟢 گروه سعید ثمانی رو در شبکه های اجتماعی دنبال کن 🟡[کانال بله سعید ثمانی ](https://ble.ir/saeidsamani) 🟣[کانال تلگرام سعید ثمانی](https://t.me/saied_samani) 🟠[پیج اینستاگرام سعید ثمانی](instagram.com/saied.samani) ✅[کسب و کارت رو آنالیز کن](https://survey.porsline.ir/s/fgJrtZMG)

Channel
سعید ثمانی
@saied_samani
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,006subscribers
-18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001743498071 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @saied_samani |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/saied_samani |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 1,006 | -4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:42 | 1,010 | -3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 1,013 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:44 | 1,016 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:11 | 1,021 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 1,022 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 1,024 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.59%
- avg views ÷ 1,006 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 46.2
- 17 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.60%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 17
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (25 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 785 |
| Reactions total | 7 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
11 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10 | 90.9% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 9.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
✨ برنامهریزی، همون تفاوتیه که بین یک کارگاه شلوغ و یک تولید موفق وجود داره. تا حالا شده سفارشت زیاد باشه، ولی آخرش مشتری ناراضی بمونه؟ 🤔 یا سفارشها آماده باشن، اما با تأخیر تحویل داده بشن؟ خیلی وقتها مشکل از کمبود نیرو یا دستگاه نیست؛ مشکل از نداشتن برنامه تولیده. وقتی برنامهریزی درستی داشته باشی: ✅ هر سفارش سر وقت وارد خط تولید میشه. ✅ دوبارهکاری و اتلاف زمان کمتر میشه. ✅ کیفیت محصول حفظ میشه. ✅ مشتری سفارشش…
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
🟢 گروه سعید ثمانی رو در شبکه های اجتماعی دنبال کن 🟡کانال بله سعید ثمانی 🟣کانال تلگرام سعید ثمانی 🟠پیج اینستاگرام سعید ثمانی ✅کسب و کارت رو آنالیز کن
🔥1
اگر بخواهی فقط یک مشکل کسبوکارت را همین امروز حل کنی، کدام را انتخاب میکنی؟ 🤔 1️⃣ کمبود نقدینگی 💰 2️⃣ فروش کمتر از انتظار 📉 3️⃣ بینظمی در تولید 🏭 4️⃣ پیدا کردن نیروی مناسب 👥
❤2
فرض کنید امروز یه سفارش بزرگ میگیرید. 📦🔥 آیا این خبر همیشه خوبه؟ 🤔 نه لزوماً...! اگه برای: 🔹 تأمین مواد اولیه 🧵 🔹 مدیریت تولید ⚙️ 🔹 زمان دریافت پول 💰 برنامه نداشته باشید، حتی یه سفارش بزرگ هم میتونه بهجای فرصت، تبدیل به فشار مالی بشه. ⚠️ رشد واقعی وقتی اتفاق میافته که فروش، تولید و نقدینگی با هم رشد کنن. 📈🚀کسب وکارهای موفق فقط دنبال سفارش بیشتر نیستن...اونا یاد میگیرن چطور رشدشون رو درست مدیریت کنن. 💡✅ …
❤1
یکی از اشتباهات رایج در کسبوکارهای پوشاک 👕 این است که فروش 📈 را با نقدینگی 💰 اشتباه میگیرند. ممکن است فروش خوبی داشته باشید ✅ و حتی روی کاغذ 📝 سود مناسبی ثبت شود؛ اما اگر بخش زیادی از سرمایه در انبار 📦، چکهای مدتدار 🧾 یا مطالبات مشتریان 👥 قفل شده باشد 🔒، کسبوکار با کمبود نقدینگی ⚠️ مواجه میشود. به همین دلیل مدیران حرفهای 👔 فقط فروش را بررسی نمیکنند؛ آنها جریان ورود و خروج پول 💸📊 را نیز بهصورت مستمر کنتر…
❤1
با امید شروع کن، با تلاش ادامه بدهو با توکل آرام باش. این ترکیب،مسیر رشد است. 💫
بسیاری از مدیران فکر میکنند مشکل فقط پیدا کردن نیروی خوب است. اما گاهی مشکل جای دیگری است: ❌ شرح وظایف مشخص نیست ❌ آموزش وجود ندارد ❌ مسئولیتها مشخص نشدهاند ❌ افراد نمیدانند چه نتیجهای از آنها انتظار میرود نیروی خوب در محیط بینظم هم نمیتواند عملکرد خوبی داشته باشد. قبل از جذب نیروی جدید، ساختار کاری خودتان را بررسی کنید.
اگر برای پاسخ به این سؤالها جواب دقیقی ندارید، احتمالاً کسبوکار شما هنوز وابسته به شخص است 👤⚠️ ❓📊 امروز چقدر تولید کردیم؟ ❓💰 کدام محصول بیشترین سود را داشت؟ ❓⏳ کدام بخش بیشترین اتلاف را ایجاد میکند؟ کسبوکار حرفهای با حافظه افراد اداره نمیشود؛ 🧠❌ با سیستم اداره میشود. ⚙️✅ هرچقدر وابستگی به افراد کمتر شود، 📉👥 امکان رشد و توسعه بیشتر خواهد شد. 🚀📈 🟢 گروه سعید ثمانی رو در شبکه های اجتماعی دنبال کن 🟡کانال ب…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @saied_samani. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,571,187 of 1,620,105entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سعید ثمانی” (@saied_samani), 1,006 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/saied_samani.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.