Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝓈𝒶𝒽𝑒𝓁𝒾𝓃𝑔𝑜 | زبان با ساحل

@sahelingo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,175subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002128483275
TypeChannel
Username@sahelingo
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sahelingo

Growth

2,1702,1802,1756 August 2026 — 2,170 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,170 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,180 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,175 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,169–2,182 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 10:342,175-5
9 Aug 2026, 03:122,180+10
6 Aug 2026, 06:062,170no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:182,170first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.9%
avg views ÷ 2,175 subscribers
Avg views / post
388
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 22 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held23 (23 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total8,935
Reactions total192
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

150 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5838.7%
4026.7%
❤‍🔥2214.7%
🤣138.67%
🆒85.33%
🏆53.33%
🐳42.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 192reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC88 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

​🥺☎دیگه از سرچ کردن و چنلِ فیک پیدا کردن خسته شدم ... واسه همین میرا برات بهترین چنل‌هایِ شاهکار تلگرام رو جمع کرده تو این ۷ تا فولدرا‼️ 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢 شما فقط هرکدوم به سلیقه‌ت می‌خوره رو Add کن، بقیه‌ش با من!❤️

7 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC104 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🗣️ چطوری به انگلیسی بگم «اتفاقاً برعکس » 🔄Actually, it’s the opposite. 🔄On the contrary. 🔄Quite the opposite. 🔄In fact, it’s the other way around. Examples : «اتفاقاً برعکس، من ازش خوشم اومد.» 🌚 Actually, it’s the opposite—I liked it. «اتفاقاً برعکس، این کار راحت‌تره.» 🌚 Actually, it’s the other way around. This is easier. همچنین برای « اتفاقاً » به تنهایی هم میتونی از if anything استفاده کنی ✅‌ 🌚 I

9

7 Aug 2026, 07:36 UTC110 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

یه منبع قوی برای تقویت دایره لغاتتون ✨

7

4 Aug 2026, 12:53 UTC268 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Periodic ?

  1. Stellar42%
  2. Regular58%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4

4 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC264 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Grab ?

  1. Seize56%
  2. Settle44%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4

4 Aug 2026, 12:49 UTC251 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Similar to “corridor”?

  1. Doorway35%
  2. Passageway65%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4

3 Aug 2026, 07:36 UTC366 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

چطور به انگلیسی بگم « وگرنه »🙄 از or else یا otherwise استفاده کن … ✨Hurry up, or else you’ll miss the bus. عجله کن، وگرنه اتوبوسو از دست می‌دی. ✨Hurry up; otherwise, you’ll miss the bus. عجله کن؛ در غیر این صورت / وگرنه اتوبوسو از دست می‌دی. اما یک تفاوت ظریف وجود داره اونم اینه که otherwise رسمی تر و خنثی تره و در ادامش باید یه جمله ای بیاد ، در صورتی که or else حالت محاوره ای تری داره و می‌تونه حا

🤣13🐳2

1 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC456 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

میدونستی به جای اینکه همیشه فقط بگیم Sure.، یه راه خیلی طبیعی‌تر هم وجود داره؟ اگر طرف ازت سؤال کرده، می‌تونی بعد از Sure همون فعل کمکی سؤال رو تکرار کنی. مثلاً: ✅ Can you help me? → Sure can! ✅ Do you know him? → Sure do! ✅ Did you call her? → Sure did! ✅ Will you come? → Sure will! ✅ Have you finished? → Sure have! ✅ Is she ready? → Sure is! این ساختار یه جورایی حس خیلی محاوره‌ای و نیتیو داره که میتونه این

🆒8❤‍🔥1🐳1

31 Jul 2026, 14:24 UTC467 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

انگلیسی واقعاً ساده ست پارت نمیدونم چندم🤷🏻‍♀️ 💎 شما می‌تونی به راحتی از PP به عنوان صفت استفاده کنی 🤏🏻🙄 فقط دقت کن که اگه صفته قبلش از To be و اگه فعله قبلش از have/has/had (که پرفکت بودن رو نشون میده ) استفاده کنی . ✨ I’m cooked ! در اینجا cooked صفته و کل جمله یک اصطلاحه به معنی : داغونم / بدجور گیر افتادم . در حالی که در جمله ی زیر cooked یک PP یا همون حالت سوم فعله : ✨ I’ve cooked ( dinner ) . شام‌ پختم

12❤‍🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 13:08 UTC403 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

8❤‍🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 08:35 UTC488 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Cause it has “ Sanctuary “ in it 😗

❤‍🔥81

30 Jul 2026, 08:33 UTC443 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ریشه‌ی کلمات پارت نهم ✨ 💡 کلمات با پسوند -ary در بسیاری از کلمات انگلیسی، -ary از لاتین -arium اومده و معنی: ➡️ محل ➡️ جای نگهداری ➡️ مکان مخصوص یک چیز رو می‌ده. 👀 به همین خاطر، هر وقت آخر یک کلمه -ary دیدی، احتمال داره به یک محل یا مکان اشاره داشته باشه. ✨ Library کتابخانه 📚 liber = کتاب — I spent the afternoon in the library. بعدازظهر رو در کتابخونه گذروندم. ✨ Sanctuary پناهگاه ⛪ محراب sanct = مقدس — The fo

6🐳1

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @sahelingo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 12:53 UTCAnonymous Quiz83 voters

Periodic ?

  1. Stellar42%
  2. Regular58%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTCAnonymous Quiz91 voters

Grab ?

  1. Seize56%
  2. Settle44%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Aug 2026, 12:49 UTCAnonymous Quiz88 voters

Similar to “corridor”?

  1. Doorway35%
  2. Passageway65%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Jul 2026, 07:23 UTCAnonymous Quiz86 voters

به هوای سرد عادت کردن!

  1. They have grown accustomed to the cold weather.26%
  2. They have gotten used to the cold weather.16%
  3. They are used to the cold weather.19%
  4. All of the above.40%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Jul 2026, 11:56 UTCAnonymous Poll84 voters

کوییز دوست دارید نه ؟😂

  1. آره خیلی ☺️75%
  2. 🙄5%
  3. چاره ای جز جواب دادن نداریم 🥰27%
  4. دیدن نتایج6%

The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

25 Jul 2026, 11:55 UTCAnonymous Quiz81 voters

“ goof off “?

  1. hang about54%
  2. be productive21%
  3. be active25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 360,833 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

کتابخونه؛
@bookxteria · 4,650
4 posts
LLWSAHEL
@englishelixir7 · 8
3 posts
°ʚ🎀ɞ°𝙚𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙣𝙖𝙡 𝙛𝙡𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙧°ʚ🎀ɞ
@eternalflowerr · 4,834
2 posts
HollywoodiDream | هالیوودی دریم
@HollywoodiDream · 14,481
2 posts
Kᴘᴏᴘ Sᴀᴠᴀɢᴇ آپدیت کیپاپ | BL
@kp0psavage · 5,085
2 posts
𝙾𝚜𝚌𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚘𝚛 𝚘𝚏 𝙻𝚒𝚏𝚎
@LifeOscillator · 1,018
2 posts
Music Lyrics 🎶
@musiclyricsir · 8,492
2 posts
՚𝙋𝙖𝙧𝙠𝙃𝙮𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙎𝙞𝙠ᥫ᭡
@parkhyungsik_fans · 3,117
2 posts
barbara palvin sprouse
@barbarapalvinDaily · 1,690
1 post
تهکوک|𝑇𝑎𝑒𝑘𝑜𝑜𝑘
@Fiction1taekook1forever · 1,349
1 post
"𝐈𝐀𝐍 𝐒𝐎𝐌𝐄𝐑𝐇𝐀𝐋𝐃𝐄𝐑"
@iansomerhalder_iran · 2,093
1 post
𝐐𝐔𝐄𝐑𝐄𝐍𝐂𝐈𝐀🦢༊
@kiddo8283 · 3,923
1 post
korean by prmiss
@koreanbyparmiss · 2,715
1 post
𝑁𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑑 | دنیای کتاب
@landofnovel · 3,371
1 post
Latin Celebrities
@LatinCelebrities · 2,272
1 post
🧚‍♀✨My world ✨🧚
@Meandfairyland · 4,918
1 post
𝗥𝘆𝗮𝗻 𝗚𝗼𝘀𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴
@RyanGosling_616 · 1,503
1 post
Shakira
@Shakirafans · 3,130
1 post
𝑫𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒎𝒔
@spaec · 4,155
1 post
قَـروقاطــے 👀
@special_chums · 2,429
1 post
𝙏𝘼𝙆𝙃𝘼𝙔𝙊𝙇𝘼𝙏𝘼𝙈
@takhayolatm · 3,394
1 post
𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐎𝐑𝐈𝐆𝐈𝐍𝐀𝐋 𝐅𝐀𝐌𝐈𝐋𝐘
@The_OriginalFamily · 1,535
1 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝓈𝒶𝒽𝑒𝓁𝒾𝓃𝑔𝑜 | زبان با ساحل” (@sahelingo), 2,175 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sahelingo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.