Channel
@sahbavosooghii
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
328subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001930190400 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sahbavosooghii |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sahbavosooghii |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 09:15 | 328 | +1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 14:55 | 327 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:06 | 328 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:06 | 327 | +5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 322 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 326 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 326 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
49 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 34 | 69.4% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 14.3% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 12.2% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.04% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 2.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
حالا چند لحظه با خودتون فکر کنید… 🌱 آخرین بار چه حرفی توی دلتون موند و نتونستید بیانش کنید؟ اگر این ویس براتون مفید بود، برای کسی که فکر میکنید به شنیدنش نیاز داره بفرستید 🙏✨️ https://t.me/sahbavosooghii
Signed 🦋Faezeh🦋
چند دقیقه برای خودتون وقت بذارید و با آرامش گوش کنید 🌱✨️
🔥7
Signed 🦋Faezeh🦋
تا حالا شده حرفی توی دلت داشته باشی، اما هرچقدر تلاش کنی نتونی بیانش کنی؟ 🌱 توی این ویس درباره علت این اتفاق و چیزی که پشت این سکوتها پنهان شده صحبت کردیم… چند دقیقه با آرامش گوشش کنید ✨️💫
Signed 🦋Faezeh🦋
زیاد فکر کردن معمولاً از خودِ اتفاق شروع نمیشود؛ از تلاش ذهن برای کنترل چیزی شروع میشود که هنوز جوابش را نمیدانیم. ذهن میخواهد همه احتمالها را بررسی کند تا غافلگیر نشویم، اما نتیجه این میشود که بارها برای اتفاقهایی خسته میشویم که شاید هیچوقت رخ ندهند. فرق «فکر کردن» و «بیشازحد فکر کردن» اینجاست: فکر کردن، ما را به یک تصمیم یا اقدام میرساند. بیشازحد فکر کردن، فقط همان نگرانی را با جملههای مختلف تکرار میک…
👍3
Signed 🦋Faezeh🦋
فرض کن یک پیام برای کسی فرستادی و هنوز جوابت را نداده. ذهنت شروع میکند: «نکنه ناراحت شده؟» «شاید حرفم بد برداشت شده.» «چرا هنوز جواب نداده؟» «نکنه اصلاً نباید پیام میدادم؟» در حالی که ممکن است طرف مقابل فقط مشغول باشد. اما ذهن ما قبل از اینکه واقعیت را بداند، چند داستان مختلف میسازد و برای هرکدام هم نگران میشود. https://t.me/sahbavosooghii
👍2
Signed 🦋Faezeh🦋
تا حالا این مدل خستگی را تجربه کردی؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1
Signed 🦋Faezeh🦋
خستهای، اما نه از کار… از فکر کردن. از اینکه یک اتفاق را بارها در ذهنت مرور میکنی. از اینکه برای چیزی که هنوز رخ نداده، دهها سناریو میسازی. از اینکه حتی وقتی بدنت استراحت میکند، ذهنت همچنان مشغول است. https://t.me/sahbavosooghii
❤4💔1
Signed 🦋Faezeh🦋
وبینار رایگان «از شخصیت تا ثروت» ✨ چرا آدمهای اثرگذار، ثروتمند میشوند؟ این وبینار کاملاً رایگان برگزار میشود و برای شرکت در آن نیازی به پرداخت هیچ هزینهای نیست. 📅 سهشنبه ۶ مرداد ⏰ ساعت ۱۷ تا ۲۰ 💻 در پلتفرم اسکایروم برای دریافت اطلاعات حضور در وبینار، لطفاً در قسمت کامنتها بنویسید: نام و نام خانوادگی + شماره تماس تا اطلاعات کامل و نحوه ورود به وبینار برای شما ارسال شود. 🌿
❤3
Signed 🦋Faezeh🦋
تمرین کاربردی امروز ✍️ تمرین: جمله نجات بساز یک موقعیت را انتخاب کن که معمولاً در آن حرف کم میآوری: جلسه کاری صحبت با مشتری پیگیری اداری گفتوگوی خانوادگی معرفی خودت حالا برای آن موقعیت، یک «جمله نجات» آماده کن. جمله نجات یعنی جملهای که وقتی ذهنت شلوغ شد، به تو کمک کند گفتوگو را آرامتر ادامه بدهی. چند نمونه: برای جلسه کاری: «اجازه بدید یک لحظه دقیقتر به سؤال شما فکر کنم.» برای مشتری مردد: «میتونم بپرسم کدوم بخش…
❤6
Signed 🦋Faezeh🦋
چرا در لحظه حرف کم میآوریم؟ چون گفتوگوهای مهم فقط با کلمات ساخته نمیشوند؛ با فشار ذهنی، ترس از قضاوت، نگرانی از واکنش طرف مقابل و عجله برای خوب جواب دادن هم همراهاند. مثلاً در یک جلسه کاری، کسی از شما سؤال سختی میپرسد. شما جواب را تا حدی میدانید، اما چون میخواهید کامل و بینقص جواب بدهید، ناگهان ذهنتان شلوغ میشود. یا وقتی مشتری میگوید: «قیمتش بالاست.» شاید واقعاً جواب داشته باشید، اما بهجای اینکه سؤال درست …
❤3👏1
Signed 🦋Faezeh🦋
جالبه که خیلی وقتها مشکل از نداشتنِ حرف نیست؛ مشکل از اینه که در لحظه، ذهن بین چند واکنش گیر میکنه: دفاع کنم؟ توضیح بدم؟ سکوت کنم؟ جواب محکم بدم؟ و همین چند ثانیه تردید، کیفیت گفتوگو رو عوض میکنه. 🎯 https://t.me/sahbavosooghii
❤2
Signed 🦋Faezeh🦋
وقتی در لحظه جواب مناسب پیدا نمیکنی، معمولاً کدوم اتفاق میافته؟ 🤔
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed 🦋Faezeh🦋
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sahbavosooghii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
تا حالا این مدل خستگی را تجربه کردی؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
وقتی در لحظه جواب مناسب پیدا نمیکنی، معمولاً کدوم اتفاق میافته؟ 🤔
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
نه گفتن برای شما بیشتر کجا سخته؟ 🤔
The shares total 152%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 1 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“صهبا وثوقی” (@sahbavosooghii), 328 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sahbavosooghii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.