Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 98 days, net +2,609. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,766–16,727 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Nov 2026, 16:10
15,850
-13
10 Nov 2026, 23:50
15,863
-20
9 Nov 2026, 12:06
15,883
+2
8 Nov 2026, 04:01
15,881
-16
6 Nov 2026, 21:54
15,897
-21
5 Nov 2026, 20:29
15,918
-5
4 Nov 2026, 23:26
15,923
+1
3 Nov 2026, 22:36
15,922
-1
2 Nov 2026, 21:26
15,923
-10
1 Nov 2026, 21:07
15,933
-10
31 Oct 2026, 23:30
15,943
+13
30 Oct 2026, 22:55
15,930
-25
29 Oct 2026, 20:55
15,955
-18
28 Oct 2026, 17:59
15,973
-6
27 Oct 2026, 18:01
15,979
-6
26 Oct 2026, 17:19
15,985
-5
25 Oct 2026, 19:58
15,990
-4
24 Oct 2026, 22:57
15,994
-7
24 Oct 2026, 01:59
16,001
-9
23 Oct 2026, 02:46
16,010
first reading
Engagement
158 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
30.7%
avg views ÷ 15,850 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,860
45 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
45
of 158 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held
158 (3 August 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total
218,750
Reactions total
16,570
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Nov 2026, 18:56 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
719
Videos
14
Links
111
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
52,486 reactions across 158 posts, in 51 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
33,429
63.7%
🤣
5,191
9.89%
👍
4,582
8.73%
🔥
1,028
1.96%
🌚
947
1.80%
💘
932
1.78%
💔
893
1.70%
😭
617
1.18%
❤🔥
556
1.06%
🤝
477
0.909%
😁
476
0.907%
💯
419
0.798%
👏
414
0.789%
😍
381
0.726%
🍓
380
0.724%
🕊
226
0.431%
👌
217
0.413%
🤯
167
0.318%
✍
118
0.225%
👻
112
0.213%
31 further kinds
924
1.76%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 158 of the 158 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52,486 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 158 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 19 of 45 posts held from the last 30 days (42.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
تو اگه حوصلهات سر رفته بیا بغل داداش برات یه چیزی آوردم🐛امشب میخوایم ببینیم مغزامون هنوز کار میکنن یا فقط دارن نقش دکور رو بازی میکنن 🧠
یه سایت پیدا کردم که با چندتا بازی کوتاه، حافظه تصویری و سرعت واکنش و توانایی حفظ کردن الگوها رو میتونه بفهمه!
✨ پیشنهاد میکنم این سهتا رو امتحان کنین:
🟣 Visual Memory: ببین حافظه تصویریت چقدر خوبه.
🟢 Reaction Time: ببین چقدر سریع واکنش نشون میدی.
🔵 Sequence Memory: ببین تا…
یادت نرفته که چندوقت پیش گفتم هر وقت اضافه و تعطیلی که دارم و وقتی از کار خلاص میشم رو دارم رو یه پروژه جدید کار میکنم؟ هنوز رو همونم.
امیدوارم تا آذر تمومش کنم و برسه به دستت، نمیدونی چندتا کتاب و مقاله رو براش بالا و پایین کردم، پدر جدم درومد ولی شک نکن ببینیش پشمات میریزه انقدر به کاره:) قول مشتی میدم!🫱🏻🫲🏽
در راستای اینکه هر روز و مناسبتی باید یه فرقی داشته باشه که زندگی رو فهم کنیم! صبحونه رو تو تخت خوردم،
ولی درباره ادامهاش و اینکه تا الان کار کردم و دارم همچنان میکنم دیگه چیزی برای گفتن ندارم :))
ولی دروودهاا به تو کله چخماخی من❤️✨
فکت امشب درباره نقاش محبوبمه، سالوادور دالی !
میگن دالی خیلی دست و دلباز بوده و البته زررنگ! هربار با دوستاش میرفتن رستوران میگفته من حساب میکنم،
اما یه حقهی خیلی بامزه میزده:)) اینکه به جای پول نقد، میومده یه چک میداده که طرف بره بانک نقد کنه!
اما با یه ترفند! پشت چک یه نقاشی خیلی سریع و کوچولو میکشیده و امضا میکرده!
و تاداا حدس میزنی چی میشده دیگه؟ احتمال ۹۹ درصد طرف اصلا نمیرفته چک رو نقد کنه! چون با خودش میگ…
از اطلاعات چرت و پرت دیشب خوشتون اومد ریاکتا چسبید گوشه قلبم🐛(مثل یه سگ پاسوخته که همین الان تلگرام نصب کرده هر ثانیه میام تلگرام ریاکتا رو میبینم و عادی نمیشی برام بعد ۹ سال باورت میشه؟😂)
امشب پس یه بامزهتر و باهوشانهترو برات آوردم! بذار شام بخورم بیام😌
دلیلش خیلی سادهاس:«ساعات طولانی زل زدن به اسکرین!»
اسکرول کردن و دیدن هی این و اون از سرتاسر دنیاا، اینکه هیچ وقتی واسه فکر!سوال! حوصله سر رفتن! استراحت خالص! فیلم دیدن یا کتاب خوندن و حتی بطالت و ... نداریم باعث این وضع کثافته! نه هوش مصنوعی،
وگرنه ai اتفاقا ابزاره! بهت سوال نمیده که، اتفاقا سوالاتو واضح برات پیش میبره و نزدیکت میکنه به رویاهایی که قبلا داشتی اما امکانشو نداشتی!
حتی همین متنای طولانی رو مطمئنم …
کلاسو رفتم
خونه تمیز شد
خودم دوش گرفتم
آخرین رد آفتابو دیدم قبل غروبش
و میخوام تمام شبو استراحت کنم و خوراکی بخورم و فیلم ببینم :)) از اینکه کاری ندارم و هم خودم و خونه بوی خوب میدهیم!خیلی خوشحالم نمیتونم توصیف کنم=]
راستی گلستون، اینو میخواستم از صب بهت بگم! که اون چیزی که اسمشو خنگی داریم میذاریم«فکر نکردنه!»
ما داریم توانایی فکر کردن و خلاقیت رو از دست میدیم... و وقتی اینارو از دست میزنیم، خوشحالی و لذت و معنی …
یه جمله از کلاس امروز بخوام بهت بگم درباره سوال یکی از عزیزانه که پرسیدن:«به نظرت الان که هوش مصنوعی اومده این نسل خنگ تر نمیشه؟»
جواب من این بود، که بستگی داره هوش و باهوش بودنو چی تعریف کنیم؟
از قدیم به ما یاد دادن تلاش و زحمت چیز باارزشیه! که خب هست آره! اما چیزی که با تلاش کمتر به دست میاد لزوما بیارزشتر نیست! :))
دنیای مدرن جای عجیبیه! و تعریف هوش از نظر من اینه:
«توانایی تنوع در سازگاری!»
هر موجودی، میخوا…
بعد که به گوش مانه میرسه، میاد به جای اون ۲۰۰ تا اضافه سریع یه دونه مارچوبه دیگه میکشه میفرسته برای یارو، و میگه این یه دونه از دسته مارچوبهاتون افتاده بود بیرون :))))
نمیدونم به چه کاریت ممکنه بیاد دونستن این، ولی خب تو کله من پر از این چیز میزای بیخوده😂
هوممم خیلی وقته یه چیز باحال رندوم باهم نخوندیما :))
ببین من عاشق آدمای بامزهام!
بامزههای خلاقا نه شوهرعمهای !
مثلا ،یه نقاش معروف داریم که احتمالا میشناسی،
اسمش ادوارد مانه بوده، تو قرن نوزده فرانسه زندگی میکرد.
این یه نقاشی داشته یه دسته مارچوبه بوده، که ۸۰۰ دلار گذاشته بوده بفروشه، یه بار یه پولدار هنردوستی به اسم «شارل افروسی» میاد اینو میخره و چون خیلی دوست داشته ۱۰۰۰ تا پرداخت میکنه! یعنی ۲۰۰ تا بیشتر.…
بهت قبلا هم گفتم که تو فیزیک یه قانونی داریم به اسم اینرسی،
به زبون ساده میگه که اجسام میل دارن تو هر حالتی که هستن، همونو ادامه بدن! مثلا اگر جسمی درحال حرکته همچنان میل داره حرکت کنه همونجوری، یا اگر وایساده یه جا میل داره همچنان همش وایسه همونجوری!
حالا من شک ندارم ما آدمام همینیم!
خود من مثلا روزی که سرم شلوغ باشه برم خرید، بیام غذا درست کنم، همون روز اتفاقا مثلا ورزشم میکنم! کتابم میخونم! هممههه کار میکنم،
و …
کار امروز تموووم شد🫱🏻🫲🏽
-یه پیج لوازم آشپزخونه فالو دارم،یه زن خونهدار جنوبیه که لوازم آشپزخونه که مشتریا ازش بخوانو پیدا میکنه میاره، چرا فالو دارم؟برای استوریاش.
چون دایرکتای حرفای خانوما و چیزایی که میخوانو استوری میکنه و جواب میده.
نمیدونم چجوری حسشو توضیح بدم اما برام جالبترین چیز دنیاست که همین لحظه که مثلا پدر من درومده و گیر کردم تو پروژه و فک میکنم ته دنیاست، مثلا هدیه میرزائیپور از یزد بهش پیام دا…
❤384🤣124🤝25🍓19💯7👍2💅2🌚1
Showing the 12 most recent of 158 posts we hold for @sahacrown. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@sahacrown edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @sahacrown as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
28 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
8 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@sahacrown named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@dawnjoo named in 5 posts, 4 November 2026 – 8 November 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
هانی پیروزرام🫧🪞 @honeyprrofficial · 42,856 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
Samaerialyoga @samaerialyoga · 23,652 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 September 2026
’Ocean🐋ء @jananocean · 39,903 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“چیزای مفید” (@sahacrown), 15,850 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sahacrown.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
