Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐’€๐’๐’–๐’“ ๐‘บ๐Ÿ’•

Channel

๐’€๐’๐’–๐’“ ๐‘บ๐Ÿ’•

@safiiyam

On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

27,439subscribers

+1,069 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ€“31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001989976702
TypeChannel
Username@safiiyam
Descriptionะœั‹ ะบะฐะถะดั‹ะน ะฟะพัั‚ ัะพะทะดะฐั‘ะผ ั ะปัŽะฑะพะฒัŒัŽ๐Ÿ’Œ ะ ะตะบะปะฐะผะฐ: @bakhadirovnn https://t.me/safiiyam_rek
CreatedBetween 1 June 2023 and 30 November 2023 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 October 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/safiiyam

Topic

Other / unclassifiable โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

26,16727,43926,80310 August 2026 โ€” 26,370 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 26,356 subscribers11 August 2026 โ€” 26,271 subscribers12 August 2026 โ€” 26,329 subscribers13 August 2026 โ€” 26,241 subscribers14 August 2026 โ€” 26,202 subscribers16 August 2026 โ€” 26,167 subscribers17 August 2026 โ€” 26,212 subscribers18 August 2026 โ€” 26,259 subscribers19 August 2026 โ€” 26,486 subscribers20 August 2026 โ€” 26,452 subscribers22 August 2026 โ€” 26,493 subscribers24 August 2026 โ€” 26,498 subscribers25 August 2026 โ€” 26,722 subscribers26 August 2026 โ€” 26,734 subscribers27 August 2026 โ€” 26,665 subscribers28 August 2026 โ€” 26,571 subscribers29 August 2026 โ€” 26,449 subscribers30 August 2026 โ€” 26,319 subscribers31 August 2026 โ€” 26,481 subscribers1 September 2026 โ€” 26,659 subscribers1 September 2026 โ€” 26,621 subscribers2 September 2026 โ€” 26,592 subscribers4 September 2026 โ€” 26,572 subscribers7 September 2026 โ€” 26,496 subscribers10 September 2026 โ€” 26,473 subscribers12 September 2026 โ€” 26,272 subscribers14 September 2026 โ€” 26,550 subscribers15 September 2026 โ€” 26,527 subscribers17 September 2026 โ€” 26,495 subscribers29 September 2026 โ€” 26,622 subscribers5 October 2026 โ€” 27,174 subscribers9 October 2026 โ€” 27,178 subscribers13 October 2026 โ€” 27,439 subscribers10 August 202613 October 2026
34 measurements spanning 64 days, net +1,069. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 25,976โ€“27,630 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Oct 2026, 14:0627,439+261
9 Oct 2026, 17:5727,178+4
5 Oct 2026, 10:5827,174+552
29 Sept 2026, 07:1926,622+127
17 Sept 2026, 21:3926,495-32
15 Sept 2026, 17:3726,527-23
14 Sept 2026, 04:3926,550+278
12 Sept 2026, 09:1826,272-201
10 Sept 2026, 07:0026,473-23
7 Sept 2026, 01:2026,496-76
4 Sept 2026, 07:3726,572-20
2 Sept 2026, 20:2826,592-29
1 Sept 2026, 22:1426,621-38
1 Sept 2026, 01:0626,659+178
31 Aug 2026, 03:5726,481+162
30 Aug 2026, 05:0626,319-130
29 Aug 2026, 05:4126,449-122
28 Aug 2026, 04:2826,571-94
27 Aug 2026, 01:0926,665-69
26 Aug 2026, 02:1426,734first reading

Engagement

49 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 94 pages of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
52.8%
avg views รท 27,439 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,500
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.741%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 49 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 13 October 2026
Posts held49 (14 July 2026 โ€“ 13 October 2026)
Views total289,650
Reactions total2,136
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Oct 2026, 00:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
โ‰ˆ3,230
Videos
โ‰ˆ505
Links
โ‰ˆ13

Lifetime counters from Telegramโ€™s own channel header, read 14 October 2026 โ€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
16s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

6,261 reactions across 39 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค3,06048.9%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1,45923.3%
๐Ÿ”ฅ90614.5%
๐Ÿ’”83613.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 6,261 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 13 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Oct 2026, 13:02 UTCโ‰ˆ4,490 views89 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Photo

โค๏ธ

โค47โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ16๐Ÿ”ฅ14๐Ÿ’”12

11 Oct 2026, 07:06 UTCโ‰ˆ9,430 views106 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Photo

โฃ๏ธ

โค47โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ23๐Ÿ’”18๐Ÿ”ฅ18

8 Oct 2026, 09:33 UTC682 views2 reactionsread 8 October 2026

Boyvachcha qzlani kanali๐Ÿคญ๐Ÿ’ธ

๐Ÿ”ฅ2

8 Oct 2026, 08:19 UTCโ‰ˆ8,950 views139 reactionsread 10 October 2026
Photo

ะžะฑะตะด ๐Ÿฝ๏ธ

โค65โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ33๐Ÿ”ฅ22๐Ÿ’”19

6 Oct 2026, 12:20 UTCโ‰ˆ20,600 views204 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Photo

๐Ÿค

โค101โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ42๐Ÿ”ฅ31๐Ÿ’”30

6 Oct 2026, 07:11 UTCโ‰ˆ2,220 views31 reactionsread 6 October 2026
Photo

KFCโค๏ธ

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ11โค10๐Ÿ”ฅ6๐Ÿ’”4

4 Oct 2026, 13:41 UTCโ‰ˆ23,400 views171 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Photo

Paulโ˜•๏ธ

โค94๐Ÿ”ฅ30โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ25๐Ÿ’”22

Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @safiiyam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegramโ€™s own answer, not this registerโ€™s. When this register asks Telegramโ€™s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it โ€” never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegramโ€™s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

๐‘ด๐’Š ๐’‚๐’Ž๐’๐’“๐’‚๐Ÿค
@storiiz ยท 23,349
#1
with love, G
@belovve ยท 9,019
#2
๐“ฉ__๐“ผ๐“ฝ๐“ธ๐“ป๐”‚๐Ÿ’™
@leylinurimm ยท 10,167
#3
๐‘จ๐’Ž๐’๐’“ ๐‘ญ๐’‚๐’•๐’Š ๐Ÿค
@amor_fati_hayoti ยท 5,491
#4
ั…ะพั‡ัƒ ัะบะฐะทะฐั‚ัŒ
@xochuskazatt ยท 16,513
#5
๐“ถ๐“ช๐“ญ๐“ฒ๐“ช๐“ผ๐“ผ'๐“ถ๐“ฒ๐“ป ๐Ÿ•Šโค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ
@madiassmir ยท 11,313
#6
ะŸั€ะพัั‚ะพ
@prosto_ll7 ยท 2,431
#7
Osmona ุณู…ุงุก๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ
@osmonabegim ยท 4,404
#8
Mental Think
@mental_think ยท 1,006 (as read 12 September 2026)
#9
แดส sแดแดœสŸ
@RSS023 ยท 2,692
#10
Russia | Crypto
@FCM_RU ยท 1,918
#11
ัั…ะพ ะผั‹ัะปะตะน
@exomisleyy ยท 42,108
#12
Withlovezunaโ™ฅ๏ธ
@withlovezuna ยท 1,930
#13
๐“œ๐”‚ ๐“ต๐“ฒ๐“ฏ๐“ฎ๐Ÿ’—
@storiestash ยท 51,207
#14
ะณะพะฒะพั€ะธั‚ ัะตั€ะดั†ะต
@govoritserdce ยท 4,940
#15
talipovar
@tallipovar ยท 534
#16

Read from Telegramโ€™s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register โ€” how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Fason koylaklar ๐Ÿฉท๐Ÿ’
@kuzgi_qishgi_fasonlar ยท 65,033
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 20 here โ€” alongside 19 others โ€” read 20 August 2026
ัั…ะพ ะผั‹ัะปะตะน
@exomisleyy ยท 42,108
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 13 here โ€” alongside 12 others โ€” read 28 August 2026
๐“œ๐”‚ ๐“ต๐“ฒ๐“ฏ๐“ฎ๐Ÿ’—
@storiestash ยท 51,207
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 25 here โ€” alongside 24 others โ€” read 25 August 2026
๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ž๐ฌ๐Ÿ’Œ
@storiesinstaa ยท 23,891
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 48 here โ€” alongside 47 others โ€” read 16 September 2026
SALATLAR RETSEPTI
@salatlar_retsepti ยท 56,337
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 25 here โ€” alongside 24 others โ€” read 22 August 2026
ั‚ะต ัะฐะผั‹ะต ะณะพะปะพัะพะฒั‹ะต
@treki333 ยท 71,352
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 31 here โ€” alongside 30 others โ€” read 28 August 2026
Dietolog Tursunboyeva๐ŸŒฟ
@dietolog_tursunboyeva ยท 264,764
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 64 here โ€” alongside 63 others โ€” read 10 August 2026
KUAF (official)๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ
@kuaf_edu ยท 34,668
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 50 here โ€” alongside 49 others โ€” read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐’€๐’๐’–๐’“ ๐‘บ๐Ÿ’•โ€ (@safiiyam), 27,439 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/safiiyam.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.