Video message, posted without a caption
❤7🤣2🔥1🫡1

Channel
@safe_stocks
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry
5,543subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001271290256 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @safe_stocks |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/safe_stocks |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:42 | 5,543 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:24 | 5,541 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 5,543 | -4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 5,547 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 5,546 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:41 | 5,543 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 5,543 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (24 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,076 |
| Reactions total | 172 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
209 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 97 | 46.4% | |
| ❤ | 63 | 30.1% | |
| 👍 | 27 | 12.9% | |
| 🤣 | 12 | 5.74% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 1.44% | |
| 🫡 | 3 | 1.44% | |
| 😎 | 2 | 0.957% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.957% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 209reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @safe_stocks. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Video message, posted without a caption
❤7🤣2🔥1🫡1
♦️ Прибыльно — не обязательно правильно Сегодня делал разбор сделок своего ученика и нашел любопытную ситуацию. Он собрал с нее +150$ при риске в 50$. Вроде всё хорошо. Как-никак, прибыль Но нет… Суть поста я отразил в заголовке: прибыльная сделка может быть ошибкой. В данном случае ученик увидел по технике «Road map», что точка контроля импульса ушла наверх. Но при этом, хочу подметить, дельта не подсветилась. …
🔥12🤝2❤1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤10🔥1
♦️ Зафиналим 1. Могу похвастаться идеальными точками входа и переворотами - прям рай для перфекциониста) 2. Забрал с рынка +3% 3. Что-то очень жёсткое происходит в эфире - по моим расчётам, кто-то скинул (или набрал шорт) на 6 миллиардов рублей! Таких явных следов не оставляют, если это не что-то срочное - есть предположение, что это кто-то сверху... Но пока не понятно 4. А если хочешь так же разбираться в рынке …
🔥9❤4👍3
♦️ Переобулся Пока нас пугали сайзом снизу и рынок шёл наверх, кто-то прям люто набирал шортовые позиции Собственно, и мы не стали отказываться от раздачи, тем более кластеры указывают на отличную возможность) Скрин позиции + кластеров прилагаю)
👍7🔥3
♦️ Крупный игрок Снова в ETH сайз - сегодня уже на 17 млн $ (1,5 ярда рублей). Если сцапают и он в дельту уйдёт - можно будет искать лонг В прошлый раз игрок на 7 млн $ после входа задрал цену на +7,5% Интересно, что цена почти совпадает с участником от 24.08 Так что запасаемся попкорном)
🔥8👍2😱2
♦️ Цена репутации Мы тут недавно с друзьями обсуждали вопрос, почему мы менее успешны в бизнесах. И пришли к выводу, что нас хорошо воспитали и у нас есть совесть. Т.е. в моем ремесле есть трейдеры, которые продают курсы за 100-150к рублей, в которых ничего нет, кроме воды + стратегии на мувингах или двойное дно. Это лажа, которая не работает. И они кричат в соцсетях, что «научу делать бабки, 1000%» и т.д. Я этому…
❤17🔥4👍3🤝1
Video message, posted without a caption
🤣10❤5🔥2👍1
♦️ Богатый трейдер, бедный трейдер История о двух парнях с личного коуча Оба торгуют Америку, оба работают с TigerTrade. Но результаты разные - и дело не в таланте В ТТ есть проблема: все объёмы премаркета впихиваются в первую свечку. Из-за этого фокус объёмов и дельт смещается, и поисковик значений работает криво Первый ученик смирился. Сказал: "Буду внимательно отбирать объёмы внутри дня". Уверен, что он тратит…
🔥14❤5👍3
♦️ Резы Вчера и сегодня работали объёмом около 4 эфиров, каждая сделка приносила порядка +100$ Вы просто посмотрите на идеальность исполнения - чисто искусство! В итоге за 2 дня +700 $ Ещё был скальпинг арбитража на +2,5% к капиталу, но чтобы не плодить кучу скринов - выложил один, думаю, для понимания достаточно)
🔥15😎2
♦️ Прекрасные деньки Делаю байк под себя, купил новые сидушки, вон на первом фото меняю. Потом скатались небольшой компанией до загородного дома и встретили лису! Бесценны комментарии моей жены за кадром))) Ну и просто фотка моей новой блестящей ласточки в ленту) P.S. Доберусь до дома — ещё и скрин с терминала скину, там вчера эфир нормально нараздавал + арбитраж хороший был)
❤12👍2🫡1
♦️ Отработка инсайда Можно, конечно, и дальше смотреть наклонки и уровни… А можно спокойно изучить кластеры и просто ЗНАТЬ, кто куда заходит) Я потом не сильно отслеживал ситуацию, но уверен, что можно было найти много хороших точек входа в лонг) Если вдруг пропустили пост про инсайд, то вот он: https://t.me/safe_stocks/2181
🔥12👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @safe_stocks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сейф | Трейдинг Фьючерсы Акции” (@safe_stocks), 5,543 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/safe_stocks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.