Channel
@safcwedp000
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,409subscribers
+240 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001858437144 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @safcwedp000 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/safcwedp000 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 16:16 | 7,409 | +18 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 21:58 | 7,391 | +29 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 00:00 | 7,362 | +21 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 14:01 | 7,341 | +36 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:05 | 7,305 | +77 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 7,228 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 7,229 | +15 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:23 | 7,214 | +12 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:52 | 7,202 | +6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:37 | 7,196 | +33 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:31 | 7,163 | -18 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:44 | 7,181 | +12 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 7,169 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:36 | 7,169 | first reading |
71 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 71 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
19 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 78.9% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 15.8% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 71 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#為什麼台妹價位會高於外籍妹妹❤️ 很多大大都會好奇，同樣是安排， 為什麼外籍的價格相對親民， 台妹的收費會更高，其實很簡單。 台灣本地的市場人口基數有限， 願意從事這份兼職的台妹， 本身就是少數，屬於物以稀為貴。 大多數台妹本身原本就有正職工作， 做這邊只是額外兼職，不會為了接單刻意壓低自己的報酬。 而外籍妹妹， 家鄉的整體薪資水準和台灣有落差， 在這邊的收入回到母國屬於很高的報酬， 所以願意接受更低的價位接單。 價格的差異，並不是去判定誰好誰壞。 本土女生長期生活在台灣， 熟悉本地環境，文化、語言溝通零障礙， 生活習慣、保養觀念也更貼合本地。 價格貴一點，你買的不只是長相跟相處， 你購買到的是順暢的相處氛圍、同文化的共鳴， 還有市場稀缺性帶來的人選條件。 一分錢一分貨，沒有絕對的好與壞， 只是不同預算，可以選擇到不同屬性的人選。 依照自己的預算與需求挑選，適合自己的，才是最好✨
最動人的莫過於客人說：「我覺得你比較好，有需要只找你，也願意推薦給朋友」❤️ 口碑從來不是靠自己吹出來的， 是一次次把細節做好，不玩話術、踏實做事， 才會換來這份毫無保留的信任。 不辜負每一份推薦，也不辜負每一次託付✨
📱📱📱 🍑：晚梔 162cm-D奶-45kg-21歲 皮膚白皙 臉蛋很漂亮 很好看 互動很親切 女友很足 溫柔細心 服務型+顔值空 喜歡身材好必點 ➖ 活力學生專區 ➖ 美魔女專區 ➖ 大奶欲女專區 ➖ 自行領取福利 ➖ 芸熙客評專區 ⭐ 我Gleezy ⭐yunxi3304 🌐芸熙TG ⭐ @yxi8688 芸熙所有性福生活⬇ 🌐：一鍵即可環遊芸熙所有性福世界
📱📱📱 🍑：芯妤 164cm-E奶-49kg-26歲 圓潤飽滿的大奶、豐沛的大乳量、一隻手無法掌握的巨乳，有著這麼棒的身材同時妹妹也是非常的騷，一台無情的榨汁機，女上搖的衝擊力超級強，弟弟會被夾得很緊，後入時還可以看到大UU在晃，妹妹也會自己往後頂，騷到無法用言語來形容，哥哥來試過就知道了呀！ ➖ 活力學生專區 ➖ 美魔女專區 ➖ 大奶欲女專區 ➖ 自行領取福利 ➖ 芸熙客評專區 ⭐ 我Gleezy ⭐yunxi3304 🌐芸熙TG ⭐ @yxi8688 芸熙所有性福生活⬇ 🌐：一鍵即可環遊芸熙所有性福世界
📱📱📱 🍑：維恩：164cm-E-48kg-26歲 身材超犯規 很愛秀S型身材 風情萬種 配合度非常高技術很好 會撒嬌 床上淫叫聲又騷又浪~ ➖ 活力學生專區 ➖ 美魔女專區 ➖ 大奶欲女專區 ➖ 自行領取福利 ➖ 芸熙客評專區 ⭐ 我Gleezy ⭐yunxi3304 🌐芸熙TG ⭐ @yxi8688 芸熙所有性福生活⬇ 🌐：一鍵即可環遊芸熙所有性福世界
📱📱📱 🍑：糖意 163cm-D-47kg-25歲 清新氣質型美女，身材輕盈又有女人味 帶點柔嫩感，性格溫柔 很有親和力 態度細心體貼，互動自然，- 清純氣質＋溫柔女友感 路線 ➖ 活力學生專區 ➖ 美魔女專區 ➖ 大奶欲女專區 ➖ 自行領取福利 ➖ 芸熙客評專區 ⭐ 我Gleezy ⭐yunxi3304 🌐芸熙TG ⭐ @yxi8688 芸熙所有性福生活⬇ 🌐：一鍵即可環遊芸熙所有性福世界
📱📱📱【調香師】 🍑：林鈴165cm-48kg-Dcup-28歲 成熟迷人的都會氣息。纖細高挑 長腿吸睛，氣質與女人味完美融合。外表冷豔，實際上親和好相處，高挑纖細的身形加上修長美腿，氣質與女人味兼具 ➖ 活力學生專區 ➖ 美魔女專區 ➖ 大奶欲女專區 ➖ 自行領取福利 ➖ 芸熙客評專區 ⭐ 我Gleezy ⭐yunxi3304 🌐芸熙TG ⭐ @yxi8688 芸熙所有性福生活⬇ 🌐：一鍵即可環遊芸熙所有性福世界
❤1
開收個房卡~
#老朋友轉介紹 以前老師教的好東西要跟好朋友一起分享~ 好的妹妹當然要分享給好朋友~
#南部可約 #南部新妹來咯~ 🌧️🪽🪽🌧️🧸🌧️🪽🪽🌧️ 妮娜 165 D 50KG 24歲 有着御姐的身材，長着甜美的外貌，給人帶來一種極度的反差。乾淨純粹的氣質，自然甜美的魅力，談吐溫柔有禮又帶點俏皮 善解人意 讓人有舒服又療癒的陪伴感。 🌧️🪽🪽🌧️🧸🌧️🪽🪽🌧️ 客評1️⃣：https://t.me/safcwedp000/16078?single 服務過程：妮娜來時非常的有禮貌 先敲門，上來後馬上自我介紹 第一印象非常的好，交完水費後 兩人就先洗洗，洗完請妮娜換上準備的內衣 E罩杯的身材把內衣突顯的更好看 妹妹幫忙口的很溫柔，我也忍不住幫她口 妹妹的叫聲非常好聽，第一次就這樣衝刺結束 妮娜很會聊天，而且剛好與我的興趣相投 兩人越聊越開心，差點來不及第二戰 眼看時間即將到，趕快第二發…結束 （妮娜身材微微肉肉的，有刺青，介意的請考慮） 但妮娜顏質真的很可愛，與刺青身材完全反差… 對芸熙的評價：感
非常阿莎力的大大 第一次配合直接就約到了自己的"天菜" 人生會遇見很多人 但願意停下來了解你的人其實不多 謝謝每一位給芸熙機會的人 這條路不算容易 但因為你們的信任 讓我更有力量繼續努力
#找介紹人，溝通到底有多重要？ 很多大大一上來，丟個預算就想要名單，覺得直接看照片就夠了。 但我為什麼會一直建議大家，可以多跟我多聊幾句，其實不是想跟你閒聊打發時間。 我想要聽懂你的真實喜好，不只是看你開出來的價位。 你喜歡什麼樣的相處感覺、怕什麼類型、能不能接受小落差、喜歡安靜還是活潑，這些照片上面全部都看不出來。 如果你不說，我只能憑猜測去幫你推薦，很容易推錯方向。 聊得越多，我越抓得準你的喜好，才可以避開你會介意的點，幫你過濾掉不合適的人選。 再來，網路上陷阱這麼多，你心裡有顧慮、有疑慮都可以直接講。 怕遇到詐騙、怕貨不對板、不知道流程該怎麼走，有任何不安都可以直接提出來。 我會把實際狀況跟你講明白，不會用話術哄你下單。 萬一後續現場真的出現狀況，我們也有溝通的基礎，我可以站在你的立場幫你居中協調，不用你一個人尷尬硬扛。 找介紹人，買的從來不只有一次見面機會。 更是買一份事前把關、出事有人承接的安心感。 願意多溝…
Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @safcwedp000. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“芸熙茶莊只用心做口碑（看不見內容私密芸熙進Gleezy群組）” (@safcwedp000), 7,409 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/safcwedp000.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.