Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for قناة السعيدة

Channel

قناة السعيدة

@saeedahtv

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,470subscribers

-186 since we began measuring on 30 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001001658884
TypeChannel
Username@saeedahtv
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded30 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/saeedahtv

Growth

19,47019,65619,56330 August 2026 — 19,656 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,645 subscribers31 August 2026 — 19,635 subscribers1 September 2026 — 19,616 subscribers2 September 2026 — 19,593 subscribers4 September 2026 — 19,566 subscribers6 September 2026 — 19,514 subscribers10 September 2026 — 19,470 subscribers30 August 202610 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 11 days, net -186. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,442–19,684 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 04:5919,470-44
6 Sept 2026, 21:3719,514-52
4 Sept 2026, 07:0019,566-27
2 Sept 2026, 20:4219,593-23
1 Sept 2026, 18:2319,616-19
31 Aug 2026, 20:4219,635-10
30 Aug 2026, 21:5319,645-11
30 Aug 2026, 07:3019,656first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 23 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.93%
avg views ÷ 19,470 subscribers
Avg views / post
570
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.258%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 38 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 38 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held38 (23 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total21,656
Reactions total19
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 01:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 50m
Average length
3m 03s

Measured directly from 36 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

19 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1157.9%
🔥526.3%
👍210.5%
👎15.26%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 23 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 08:51 UTC378 viewsread 3 September 2026
Video

انتخابات 93 ... ماذا جرى خلف الكواليس بين المؤتمر والإصلاح ؟ #حصاد_السنين #السعيدة

2 Sept 2026, 08:50 UTC376 viewsread 3 September 2026
Video

سر الانشقاق الكبير..كيف تحول علي محسن من حليف إلى معارضة ؟ #حصاد_السنين #السعيدة

2 Sept 2026, 08:48 UTC338 viewsread 3 September 2026
Video

شروط اللقاء المشترك والثلث المعطل ... #حصاد_السنين #السعيدة

2 Sept 2026, 08:46 UTC275 viewsread 3 September 2026
Video

عندما اقتحمت رشيدة القيلي المؤتمر الصحفي.. كيف تعامل عبده الجندي مع الموقف ؟ #حصاد_السنين #السعيدة

2 Sept 2026, 08:43 UTC218 viewsread 3 September 2026
Video

كيف أُسقط عبده الجندي في انتخابات 1997 ؟ #حصاد_السنين #السعيدة

2 Sept 2026, 08:41 UTC221 viewsread 3 September 2026
Video

لماذا أنشأ صالح “معارضة للمعارضة” ؟ #حصاد_السنين #السعيدة

2 Sept 2026, 08:40 UTC208 viewsread 3 September 2026
Video

معبد أثري في عدن مهدد بالبسط.. تحرك عاجل لإنقاذه #صدى_الأسبوع

2 Sept 2026, 08:38 UTC212 viewsread 3 September 2026
Video

مشروع التوريث .. القرار الذي غير موازين السلطة #حصاد_السنين #السعيدة

2 Sept 2026, 08:37 UTC209 viewsread 3 September 2026
Video

مزارعو أبين يحولون المخلفات إلى ذهبٍ للتربة #صدى_الأسبوع

2 Sept 2026, 08:34 UTC209 viewsread 3 September 2026
Video

كان رمزًا للهيبة.. لماذا اختفى الزي العبدلي من لحج؟ #صدى_الأسبوع

2 Sept 2026, 08:32 UTC212 viewsread 3 September 2026
Video

مأساة البحث عن الماء.. 3 ضحايا غرقًا في إب وذمار #صدى_الأسبوع

2 Sept 2026, 08:31 UTC217 viewsread 3 September 2026
Video

في عمر الـ21.. صدام يصارع الفشل الكلوي وينتظر إنقاذه #صدى_الأسبوع

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @saeedahtv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

الإستشفاء بالقرأن الكريم وبالدعاء
@iistshfa2017 · 40,252
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“قناة السعيدة” (@saeedahtv), 19,470 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/saeedahtv.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.