Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 23 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @bidelidan. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
23 measurements spanning 98 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,480–2,505 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Nov 2026, 00:07
2,493
-1
8 Nov 2026, 22:54
2,494
-1
5 Nov 2026, 15:40
2,495
-2
3 Nov 2026, 01:24
2,497
+5
30 Oct 2026, 20:48
2,492
-2
28 Oct 2026, 05:36
2,494
-1
25 Oct 2026, 09:30
2,495
+2
21 Oct 2026, 23:28
2,493
+2
18 Oct 2026, 12:46
2,491
-4
15 Oct 2026, 05:39
2,495
-2
12 Oct 2026, 05:40
2,497
+6
5 Oct 2026, 11:15
2,491
+8
27 Sept 2026, 13:17
2,483
-2
7 Sept 2026, 04:38
2,485
-3
2 Sept 2026, 03:25
2,488
-4
30 Aug 2026, 11:13
2,492
+2
23 Aug 2026, 23:46
2,490
-1
20 Aug 2026, 01:16
2,491
-6
17 Aug 2026, 09:38
2,497
+1
10 Aug 2026, 16:11
2,496
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
26 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
12
46.2%
👍
10
38.5%
👏
4
15.4%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
گرفتار وفا ننگ رهایی برنمیدارد
همه گر ناله گردم برنمیآیم ز زنجیرت
یکی از خصیصههای «زنجیر» در شعر بیدل داشتن صدا و ناله کردن است؛ از به هم خوردن حلقههای زنجیر صدایی برمیخیزد که بیدل آن را نالۀ زنجیر میداند:
مانع بیتابی آزادگان فولاد نیست
ناله در وحشت گریبان میدرد زنجیر را
و
نشئه را از شوخیِ خمیازۀ ساغر چه باک؟!
نیست از زنجیر پروا نالۀ وارسته را
و
آزادگان ز کلفت اسباب فارغاند
نتوان نگاه داشت به زنجیر ناله را…
زین هستی بیهوده صوابی که تو داری
گر جرم تصور نکنی سخت گناهیست
#بیدل_دهلوی
شاعر میگوید بزرگترین گناه انسان، ادعایِ بودن و «من» گفتن است. اگر تو این هستیِ مجازی را مایه فخر و طاعت بدانی و به آن مغرور باشی، در ورطهٔ شرکِ خفی و خودپرستی سقوط کردهای؛ چرا که شرطِ اولِ عشق و معرفت، نیستی و گذشتن از خویشتن است.
#مهدی_احمدوند
یک بیت و یک نکته از صائب
نیست اظهار جوانی، خجلت بی حاصلی است
این که می دارم نهان از هم نشینان سال خویش
#صائب
به عقیده ی صائب چگونه زندگی کردن انسان (کیفیت)بسیار مهم تر و با ارزش تر از چقدر زندگی کردن او (کمیت)می باشد.
به عبارتی دیگر انسان در طول و مسیر زندگی خود هر اندازه موفق تر و نسبت به هم نوعان خود تاثیر گذارتر و مفید تر باشد؛ وجودش در جامعه بیشتر احساس شده و مورد قبول و احترام اطرافیان و جامعه قرار خواهد گرفت و…
قطع زنجیر ز مجنون تو نتوان کرد
موج جزو بدن آب روان می باشد
بیدل دهلوی
به نظر می رسد که در این بیت بیدل با اسلوب معادله ای زیبا می خواهد وابستگی شدید عاشق مجنون را به معشوق نشان داده و خطاب به محبوب می گوید :
عشق تو مانند زنجیری به پای معشوق بسته شده است و جزئی از او شده و جدایی ناپذیر و قطع نشدنی است .
در مصراع دوم مثالی آورده و می گوید : همان طوری که موج دریا جزئی از بدن آن است و هیچ گاه از دریا جدا نمیگردد و …
خارخار یعنی اضطراب و تشویش و خلجان و ... اما بیدل همیشه ساختار واژه رو هم در نظر میگیره، خار.
کینه رو به خار تشبیه کرده
انسانی که خارخار کینه در وجودش نیست، لاجرم صافطبعه
دو تا نماد برای صاف طبعی آورده، آیینه و گوهر
از طرفی مژگان به خارخار تشبیه شده، انگار که مژهها هر کدوم یه خار باشند
حالا مژگان برای آینه و گوهر چیه؟ جوهر
جوهر چیه؟ در اثر صیقل زدن خطوط ریزی روی آینه نقش میبست که شبیه خار بودن، بیدل بهشون میگه خا…
در وضو زاهد چو طوفان بر سر آب آورد
مینشاند خاک را در خون، تیممکردنش
چند روز پیش در پایان پست «تقابل وضو و تیمم» گفتم که متوجه سازوکار منطق تصویری این بیت نمیشوم، بیتی که به ظاهر خیلی ساده است. ابتدا عرض کنم که آقای طباطبایی این بیت را به شکل زیر ضبط کردهاند:
در وضو زاهد چه طوفان بر سر آب آورد؟
مینشاند خاک را در خون تیممکردنش
نسبت به تصحیح خالمحمد، مصرع اول سوالی شده و قید زمان «چو» (وقتی که) با صفت پرسشی «چ…
● دمی با بیدل
"موجِ خونم هرقدر توفاننما خواهد شدن
حقِ شمشیرِ تو رنگینتر ادا خواهد شدن"
شمشیرِ جفای معشوق برای رنگینیاش، موج توفان گونهی خون عاشق را میخواهد.
باتوجه به این بیدل میگوید: برای ادای حقِ شمشیرِ تو(که اشاره به جفای معشوق است) و رنگینی آن، موج خونم هرقدر توفان کند، بیتردید این چیزی جز رنگین تر ادا کردن حقِ شمشیرِ جفای تو نخواهد بود.( این رویکرد بیگمان بازگوکنندهی همان نگرش باستانی به جفای معشوق ا…
● دمی با بیدل
"چو حباب عالمی را، هوسِ کلاهداریست
بهدماغِ پوچمغزان، چقدر هوا نشسته" (بیدل)
باتوجه بهمفهومِ این بیت، نیای معانی میگوید: شماری که هوسِ دنیاپروری و دنیازدهگی محض را در سر دارند، مانند حباب (که کنایه از هستی زودگذر و بیثبات است) اشتیاق به کلاهداری دارند.
کلاهداری میتواند اشاره به عطشِ ما به قدرت و علاقهی وافر به نفس اماره هم تلقی شود که شمارِ زیادی مثلِ حُباب، هوسِ مفرط به این کلاهداری را…
● دمی با بیدل
"با همه پروازِ شوق از ما زمینگیری نرفت
جز به حیرت بر نمیآید نگاهِ ناتوان" (بیدل)
انسان با همه اشتیاقی که برای پرواز؛ یعنی رسیدن به آزادهگی دارد؛ بازهم بربنیاد محدودیتها وتعلقاتی که دارد (و اینجا زمینگیری اشاره به "معاش" که یکی از مراحل صوفیه است، میباشد) نمیتواند از ماهیتِ زمینیبودنش یکسره ببُرّد؛ زیرا او طبیعتن انسان است و خدا نیست؛ بنابرین آزادی، آزادهگی و اختیار او مانند: آزادی، آزادهگ…
● دمی با بیدل
"به هیچ آهنگ، عرضِ مُدعا صورت نمیبندد
چو مضمونِ بلند افتادهام در خاطرِ لالی" (بیدل)
"عرضِ مُدعا"، میتواند اشاره به مطلوبی انگاشته شود که مانند "مضمونِ بلند" (مفهومِ بزرگ) به هیچ آهنگی یا طریقی نمیتواند بیان شود.
برپایهی این نگرش، نیای معانی (بیدل) میگوید: به هیچ شکل یا گونهای، نمیشود مطلوبم (عرض مُدعا) را بیان کنم؛ یعنی آنچه من میخواهم بگویم، از بس بلند( بزرگ) است، هیچ شیوهای آن را برنمی…
● دمی بابیدل
"نگه گر نیستی اشکی شو و از خویش بیرون آ
چو مژگان چند پروازت بهبال و پر کند بازی"(بیدل)
"نگه" (نگاه) به مفهوم بینش و دیدِ ژرف برای شناخت از پدیدههای متعلق به هستی و معرفتِ بیشتر است.
نیای معانی (بیدل) با توجه به این مسأله می گوید: اگر دیدی (نگهی) برای معرفت نداری، در خودبینی (شاید هم خودبرتربینی) بهسر مبر؛ بل در عوض، اشکی شو و از چشم خودبینی فرو ریز و هر گز پروازت (که میتواند اشاره بهوسعتِ دید و…
زین نشیمن نغمۀ شوقی بهسامان کرده گیر
سایۀ دیوار دارد زیر و پشت بام بم
با این که نشیمن کجاست و نغمه چگونه نغمهای است کاری ندارم، امشب که داشتم «سایۀ دیوار» بیدل رو میخوندم متحیر بازی زبانی این بیت شدم. یکی از تصویرهای نسبتا بسامددار بیدل «خوابیدن زیر سایۀ دیوار» است و با این مضمون ابیات درخشانی رو ساخته، ابیاتی که مضامین متفاوتی هم دارند؛ مثلاً یکی از زیباترینهایشان همین بیت زیر است:
دامنِ عفو، حمایتکدهٔ غفلتِ ما…
❤1👍1
Signed Mahdi Ahmadvand
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @saeb_e_tabrizi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“صائب تبریزی(شاعران سبک هندی)” (@saeb_e_tabrizi), 2,493 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/saeb_e_tabrizi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
