12 measurements spanning 12 days, net -1,459. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 69,023–70,920 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 17:47
69,242
-156
16 Aug 2026, 14:56
69,398
-174
14 Aug 2026, 19:44
69,572
-208
13 Aug 2026, 11:38
69,780
-128
12 Aug 2026, 08:35
69,908
-105
11 Aug 2026, 09:47
70,013
-155
10 Aug 2026, 08:26
70,168
-120
9 Aug 2026, 05:51
70,288
-146
8 Aug 2026, 04:16
70,434
-140
7 Aug 2026, 04:53
70,574
-127
6 Aug 2026, 01:35
70,701
no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:42
70,701
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 30 January 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6m 18s
Average length
2m 06s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
81,641 reactions across 15 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 98.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
80,428
98.5%
custom 5314372238902843871
760
0.931%
🔥
453
0.555%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81,641reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2024 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3,404
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 15 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
1,880
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sadykov_fanis. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 January 2024 to 18 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Эмоции от последних событий улеглись.
Проект закрылся. И сейчас хочется немного выдохнуть, пересобраться и начать что-то новое — наступил период поиска. Я, честно, люблю это время.
С одной стороны, скорее хочется определённости. Понять, куда двигаться дальше, за что браться и во что вкладывать силы. Неопределённость давит, и было бы странно делать вид, что это не так.
Но мы уже достаточно долго в стартапах, чтобы…
Привёз сына на каникулы к родителям в деревню, где вырос сам. К его бабушке и дедушке. На землю, по которой ходили мой отец, дед, прадед и ещё много поколений до нас.
На днях с другом обсуждали, что у нас, деревенских, есть странное чувство несгораемого баланса. Что бы ни происходило в жизни, как бы тебя ни мотало, где-то есть точка, которая не обнуляется. Дом. Двор. Поле. Тяжело объяснить эту связь с землёй. На тат…
1,5 года, которые невозможно уместить в одно видео. Половина лучшего остаётся за кадром, а вторую половину не пропускает Ильзира.
Мы много работали. Очень много. Спорили до хрипоты, собирались в ночи, вытаскивали релизы, держали темп и отдавались делу так, как умеют только люди, которым не всё равно.
Но мы ещё и жили вместе. Смеялись, праздновали, поддерживали друг друга и превращали работу не просто в работу, а в …
Телега прекращает работу с 1 июля
За год мы сделали удобное и востребованное приложение для российских пользователей. Телега показала рабочую бизнес-модель, собрала многомиллионную аудиторию и прошла большой путь в очень непростых условиях.
Мы приложили немало усилий, чтобы сохранить пользователям привычный и безопасный доступ к связи и своим аккаунтам. Но в формате Telegram-клиента мы не можем обеспечить полную ло…
Чуркан стал для нас ежегодным ритуалом.
Там нет связи и суеты. Только лес, баня-палатка, песни у костра и та простая радость, в которой взрослый вспоминает, каково это - быть ребёнком и жить приключениями.
Чуркан 2026 прошёл по традиции огненно.
Запустили Телегу Плюс
Рассчитывали сделать это раньше и технически были готовы еще в середине апреля. Но большие запуски - множество тонкостей и работы с партнёрами.
7 мая, День связи. Символичная дата для запуска Плюса.
Сегодня мы открыли доступ 1 млн пользователей из списка ожидания. Подписка: вход без ожидания, доступ ко всем функциям Телеги, включая род. контроль.
Мы решили идти в подписку, чтобы дальше расши…
❤816
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @sadykov_fanis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 2,966 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Фанис Садыков” (@sadykov_fanis), 69,242 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sadykov_fanis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
