Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 45 days, net +34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,626–3,670 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 14:19
3,665
+1
11 Sept 2026, 12:15
3,664
+11
6 Sept 2026, 11:58
3,653
+1
2 Sept 2026, 08:22
3,652
+1
29 Aug 2026, 22:46
3,651
+1
27 Aug 2026, 07:35
3,650
+4
24 Aug 2026, 17:03
3,646
+1
21 Aug 2026, 04:17
3,645
+4
15 Aug 2026, 07:18
3,641
+1
11 Aug 2026, 17:33
3,640
+2
9 Aug 2026, 03:52
3,638
+6
6 Aug 2026, 12:01
3,632
+1
6 Aug 2026, 04:33
3,631
no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:38
3,631
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 7 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
26s
Average length
26s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
503 reactions across 20 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
235
46.7%
👍
83
16.5%
👌
79
15.7%
👏
51
10.1%
❤🔥
16
3.18%
🕊
12
2.39%
😢
12
2.39%
💔
3
0.596%
😭
3
0.596%
😐
2
0.398%
🙏
2
0.398%
👎
1
0.199%
💘
1
0.199%
🔥
1
0.199%
🤔
1
0.199%
🤨
1
0.199%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 503 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 December 2025 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
از اوضاع و سیاست خواسته بودید بیشوخی میگویم که هیچ اطلاعی ندارم.
فقط شنیدم که کابینه تغییر کرده.
کی آمد و کدام خر رفت هیچ نمیدانم و اصلاً نمیخواهم بدانم.
نهتنها خودم را تبعه مملکت پرافتخار گل و بول نمیدانم بلکه احساس یکجور محکومیت میکنم.
محکومیت عجیب و بیمعنی و پوچ.
فقط از خودم میپرسم:
«چقدر بیشرم و مادرقحبه بودهام که در این دستگاه مادرقحبهها توانستهام تا حالا carcasse (لاشه) خودم را بکشم!»
قیآلود و کثیف…
از شما چه پنهان،
اصلاً ما آدمیزاد نیستیم،
تمدن و آزادی و عدل و داد و اخلاق شما هم که بقول خودتان از نژاد برگزیده هستید بدرد ما نمیخورد.
قضيه زير بته
صادق جان هدايت
@sadegh_jan_hedayat➿
تو خون هزاران بیگناه را از صبح تا شام مثل زالو میمکی و کیف میکنی و اسم خودت را سیاستمدار و اعیان گذاشتی!
این محیط پست ننگین هم امثال تو را میپسندد و از تو تقویت میکند و قوانین جهنمی این اجتماع فقط برای دفاع از منافع خوکهای جهنمی افسارگسیخته مثل تو درست شده و میدان اسب تازی را به شما داده.
تف به محیطی که تو را پرورش کرده
اگر لیاقت اخ و تف را داشته باشد!
حاجی آقا
صادق جان هدایت
@sadegh_jan_hedayat➿
به گور پدرشان و میهنشان و اقداماتشان
اما دیگر روضه خوانی کردن و ننه من غریبم در آوردن به کلی بی جاست.
آب از سرچشمه گل است.
از میان نامه ها به شهید نورایی
صادق جان هدایت
@sadegh_jan_hedayat➿
یک احساساتی هست ، یک چیزهائی هست که نمیشود بدیگری فهماند ، نمیشود گفت ، آدم را مسخره میکنند ، هرکسی مطابق افکار خودش دیگری را قضاوت میکند.
زنده بگور
صادق جان هدایت
@sadegh_jan_hedayat ➿
فیلم طعم گیلاس
شاهکار عباس کیارستمی
شبها خوابتان نمیبرد،
اغلب بلند میشوید با خودتان حرف میزنید،
تفریح و گردش را به خودتان حرام کردهاید و گرم کتاب شدهاید،
باور بکنید،
این کارها آدم را زود پیر میکند!
تخت ابونصر
صادق جان هدایت
@sadegh_jan_hedayat➿
اضطراب، بیتکلیفی، مسئولیت و حس absurdité(بیمعنایی) زندگی همه دست به یکدیگر دادهاند.
باید هم همینطور باشد اما یک مطلب است که هنوز نمیتوانم بپذیرم و آن اینست که هر چه شده و خواهد شد به درک اما اقلاً توانستهاید چهار صبا از این جهنمدرهی وحشتناک فرار بکنید و نفسی بکشید و پوستی نو بکنید.
اقلاً توانستهاید ۵ روز، نیمساعت و یا یک ربع بیآنکه خودتان را گول زده باشید کنار رودخانهی سِن تنها گردش بکنید و حس بکنید که تنه…
موجود عجیب و مضحکی شدهام،
شعورم درست کار میکند،
ولی احساساتم چطور بگویم؟
کند شده؛
نه آرزویی دارم و نه به چیزی دلبستهام و نه به کسی علاقهمندم.
دایی وانیا
آنتوان چخوف
@sadegh_jan_hedayat➿
فقط روزها میآیند و میروند نه حقی داریم که از کسی بازخواست کنیم نه میهنی که به گذشته و آیندهی آن علاقمند باشیم نه آیندهای که برای بهبودی آن بکوشیم و نه زال و زاتولی که در تأمین آینده او تلاشی بکنیم و نه دماغی و دلی که به کاری سر خودمان را گرم بکنیم بدتر از دوزخ سارتر همهچیز بیطرفانه میگذرد با جار و جنجال و سر و صدا.
از میان ️نامه ها به حسن شهید نورایی
صادق جان هدایت
@sadegh_jan_hedayat➿
❤24😢6😭3❤🔥1👌1👍1👏1🤔1
Signed م.همرنگ➿
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sadegh_jan_hedayat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@sadegh_jan_hedayat named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@sadegh_jan_hedyat named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
صادق هدایت @sadeghhedayat · 32,036 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 5 September 2026
احمد شاملو @ShamlouHouse · 43,317 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“صادق جان هدایت➿” (@sadegh_jan_hedayat), 3,665 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sadegh_jan_hedayat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
