Ого! Похоже, Маркус хвастается Дафне своей новой коллекционной карточкой 🙃 ___ Wow! Looks like Marcus is showing off his new collectible card to Daphne 😐
❤32🔥5🍌1😁1

Channel
@sad_crab
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
3,511subscribers
+17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001267733442 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sad_crab |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sad_crab |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 3,511 | +14 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 3,497 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 3,501 | +3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:19 | 3,498 | +5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:36 | 3,493 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:51 | 3,494 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 3,496 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 3,494 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (1 August 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 21,776 |
| Reactions total | 309 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
309 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 187 | 60.5% | |
| 💘 | 47 | 15.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 36 | 11.7% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 5.83% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 1.62% | |
| 🍌 | 4 | 1.29% | |
| 🍓 | 4 | 1.29% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 0.647% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.647% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 0.324% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.324% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.324% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 0.324% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 309reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sad_crab. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ого! Похоже, Маркус хвастается Дафне своей новой коллекционной карточкой 🙃 ___ Wow! Looks like Marcus is showing off his new collectible card to Daphne 😐
❤32🔥5🍌1😁1
Полумна нашла неплохую альтернативу нижнему белью 😒 ___ Polumna found a pretty good alternative to underwear ☺️
❤66💘5🍓2❤🔥1🥰1
А какую локацию вам хотелось бы увидеть в игре следующей?
The shares total 184%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤5
And now - it’s time for a poll! In upcoming patches, Hogwarts will get even bigger! You’ll have the chance to explore the hospital wing, the long-awaited greenhouses will open soon, the prefects’ bathroom will return to the story, and that’s far from the full list of locations we’re preparing. And which location would you like to see in the game next? Please vote or leave a comment below! 1. The Ghost Tower - it’s…
❤8🍓1💘1🔥1
July turned out to be a very busy month for our team. We finished implementing all the content for 0.12.2B, made significant progress on 0.13A, began full-scale preparations for 0.14A, updated several in-game locations, improved our internal development tools, and continued working to release new versions while constantly improving the game’s quality. Over the next month, our main efforts will be focused on finishi…
❤🔥2💘1🔥1
Another thing we’re excited to mention is the feedback form. Now you can ask our team questions directly about virtually any topic related to the game: lore, storyline, characters, code, art, or our plans for the future. We always look forward to reading your questions and want to learn more about what matters to you, as well as share more about what goes on “behind the scenes” of development. We’ll address the mos…
❤🔥2🌭1💘1
Our programmers have managed to implement several important technical improvements this month. One of the most useful internal innovations has been an updated logic when working with saves in the development version. Previously, after changes were made, old save files quickly became outdated, and devs and testers often had to replay large sections of the story just to continue testing new versions. Now that this iss…
❤🔥2💘1🔥1
One of Marcus’s first companions will be Ginny, and their adventure together promises to be rich in both events and emotions.
❤🔥2🍾1💘1
Our writers are currently fully focused on creating content for version 0.14A. This patch will introduce a completely new adventure format. For the first time, Marcus will investigate the mysteries of Hogwarts and seek a way out of difficult situations not alone, but alongside various girls. Each of them will become a full-fledged partner for the duration of her quest: she’ll help find solutions, participate in inve…
❤🔥2💘1🥴1
And this is what it looks like after the visual update: The colors are brighter and more vibrant, and the level of detail has been significantly improved. It seems like Ginny and Hermione feel much more at home in the updated location. The artists will continue to improve the design of existing locations, gradually updating the background characters and adding new small details that make the game world even more vi…
❤🔥2🍌1💘1
Just for a quick comparison, this is what the Gryffindor dormitory originally looked like:
👍2🍌1
The artists continue to work on the planned tasks. In addition to creating full-screen scenes for 0.13A, they are actively working on content for version 0.13B, where you’ll see plenty of new art, lively humorous events, unexpected situations, and interactions with a wide variety of students in the castle. At the same time, we’re continuing to gradually update existing content. Over the past months, several older i…
❤🔥2💘1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sad_crab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А какую локацию вам хотелось бы увидеть в игре следующей?
The shares total 184%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sad Crab | Innocent Witches (Невинные ведьмы)(18+)” (@sad_crab), 3,511 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sad_crab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.