Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for седкун

Channel

седкун

@sad69kun20

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,418subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001668772347
TypeChannel
Username@sad69kun20
Descriptionрисульки и не только группа в вк: https://vk.com/sad69kun щитпост: https://t.me/+fJTSyOlKlLw4MTky комишки (пишите в лс тгк или анонимку) РЕКЛАМЫ НЕТ по различным вопросам пишите в лс канала чат для анонимных вопросов: https://t.me/anonaskbot?start=cepi
Created24 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/sad69kun20

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

12,41412,51112,462.512,4186 August 202611 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 97 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,399–12,526 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 10:5012,418+2
9 Nov 2026, 15:5912,416+2
8 Nov 2026, 09:5712,414-1
7 Nov 2026, 07:1612,415-2
6 Nov 2026, 04:0112,417-6
5 Nov 2026, 01:4412,423-9
3 Nov 2026, 23:0812,432-12
2 Nov 2026, 21:0712,444-7
1 Nov 2026, 19:0712,451+4
31 Oct 2026, 17:5412,447-1
30 Oct 2026, 19:2112,448-2
29 Oct 2026, 22:0812,450-1
28 Oct 2026, 22:0812,451-12
27 Oct 2026, 19:2712,463-2
26 Oct 2026, 21:5612,465-5
24 Oct 2026, 20:2712,470+1
23 Oct 2026, 23:4512,469+5
22 Oct 2026, 23:5412,464-6
21 Oct 2026, 23:4112,470+2
20 Oct 2026, 21:2012,468first reading

Engagement

49 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.8%
avg views ÷ 12,418 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,710
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 49 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held49 (5 July 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total67,780
Reactions total8,646
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 22:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,000
Videos
≈240
Links
≈169

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
26s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

21,706 reactions across 49 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤15,09769.6%
💅4,32919.9%
🐳1,7718.16%
🤯4251.96%
😱840.387%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21,706 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
623
across the posts below
Posts paid on
25
of 49 we hold a reading for · 51%
Most on one post
382
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sad69kun20. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 49 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 July 2026 to 13 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 25 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 19:32 UTC960 views182 reactions11 Starsread 13 November 2026
Photo

у меня осталось много обрезков от бумаги для черчения, поэтому решил ее не выкидывать, а пустить в расход на разные рисунки в поезде пришла идея сделать подобный триптих, и вчера закончил, как раз использовал новую акварель, которую недавно приобрел (обзор будет позже) оказалось дешманская бумага очень неплохо взаимодействует с таким материалом, были свои трудности, но особо не заморачивался, все-таки удивительно, …

❤129💅36🐳17

13 Nov 2026, 15:17 UTC≈1,580 views354 reactions25 Starsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#сказка@sad69kun20 айва

💅229❤98😱27

12 Nov 2026, 19:40 UTC≈2,330 views341 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

уже несколько дней рисую на мусоре (отдохнули, пора за заказы)

💅235❤106

12 Nov 2026, 17:26 UTC≈2,560 views684 reactions2 Starsread 13 November 2026
Photo

принял участие в шибари колоде

❤485💅119🐳80

12 Nov 2026, 11:46 UTC≈2,590 views116 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @UMlapPhoto

Друзья! Я уже какое-то время активно занимаюсь татуировкой и наконец могу представить вам мое скромное портфолио которое можно посмотреть на новом канале Я нарисовала немного эскизов на некоторые из которых хочу пригласить моделей („• ֊ •„) Москва! Ну и в общем теперь ко мне можно записаться на татулечку, я рисую индивидуальные эскизы и все такое (⁄ ⁄•⁄ω⁄•⁄ ⁄) Если вам что-нибудь понравилось то я буду рада видеть …

❤92💅24

11 Nov 2026, 19:45 UTC≈2,560 views503 reactions11 Starsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#сказка@sad69kun20 IX. The Hermit

❤382💅78🐳43

11 Nov 2026, 10:25 UTC≈2,660 views293 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

последний маркет в Москве в этом году РАЗРЯД | 6 декабря | Москва

❤241💅34🐳18

10 Nov 2026, 19:59 UTC≈2,770 views226 reactions15 Starsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#сказка@sad69kun20 9. Отшельник Мудрый старец, стоит в одиночестве. Для меня эта карта про уединение, чтобы разобраться в себе и своих мыслях. Герой не боится одиночества, в нем он будто находит какой-то покой и гармонию. В моем сюжете Отшельником выступает Садовник, одиноко опирающийся на зеленом лугу. Если в оригинале мы видим контраст между окружением и фонарем, мне хотелось его передать как раз через местность …

❤201🐳13💅12

8 Nov 2026, 16:28 UTC≈3,200 views409 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

друзья спасибо всем за смерч! очень рад был всех видеть!!!! и конечно спасибо за презенты и валентинки с добрыми словами 🌹🌹🌹🌹

❤294💅109🤯6

5 Nov 2026, 16:45 UTC≈4,060 views509 reactions10 Starsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#сказка@sad69kun20 VIII. Strength

❤383💅84🐳42

5 Nov 2026, 15:40 UTC≈3,550 views86 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @madkminizinePhoto

♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️ ♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️ 🌘 В мире есть одна самая сильная, самая губительная вещь. И имя ей — любовь. 🌘 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 СРОК ПРЕДЗАКАЗОВ 05 ноября — 15 декабря 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 О зине: 🌟Формат А5, мягкая обложка, скоба 🌟40-45 страниц 🌟Издание строго 18+ 🌟Сопутствующий мерч 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ФОРМА ПРЕДЗАКАЗА 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🌟Доставка осуществляется только СДЭКом, Яндекс.Доставкой …

❤59💅20🐳7

4 Nov 2026, 15:55 UTC≈3,480 views208 reactions10 Starsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#сказка@sad69kun20 8. Сила Для меня она, про способность совладать со своим животным нутром. Способность мудро справляться с невзгодами. Эта карта очень спокойная и умиротворенная, никакой агрессии и жестокости, а только спокойствие и мягкая сила. Так как лев это огненный знак, хотелось максимально подчеркнуть и этот момент. Моя интерпретация, больше направлена в сторону принятие своей тени и «животных инстинктов»,…

❤153💅31🐳24

Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @sad69kun20. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@sad69kun20 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
5 November 2026
Most recent edit
5 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 4 posts on @sad69kun20 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
10 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
5 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
4

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

сильверхезер
@silverheatherr · 19,325
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 5 October 2026
АПОЛЛИ
@apollisolis · 23,126
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 19 September 2026
Арт-студия Виталия Лещенко
@artstudioVL · 20,084
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“седкун” (@sad69kun20), 12,418 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sad69kun20.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.