Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Refutation upon the Sa’afiqah

Channel

Refutation upon the Sa’afiqah

@saafiqah

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

25subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003112156799
TypeChannel
Username@saafiqah
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 11 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 October 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 3 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/saafiqah

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2325246 August 2026 — 23 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23 subscribers15 August 2026 — 24 subscribers9 September 2026 — 25 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 34 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23–25 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 19:5925+1
15 Aug 2026, 17:3724+1
11 Aug 2026, 11:3323no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:1223first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 12s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤6100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 October 2025 to 31 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Oct 2025, 21:49 UTC214 views0 reactionsread 11 August 2026

A: “ ‘O zani (ʿāhir)’ betekent: ‘O overspelpleger’, als men daarmee beledigend bedoelt (met de intentie van beschuldiging van overspel). Als hij dat bedoelt, dan wordt hij naar zijn intentie gevraagd: als zijn bedoeling werkelijk overspel was, dan is hij een lasteraar en krijgt hij de hadd-straf voor laster, tenzij degene die beledigd is hem vergeeft. Maar als hij iets anders bedoelde — dat hij met ‘ʿāhir’ bijvoorbee…

21 Oct 2025, 21:45 UTC192 views0 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

https://binbaz.org.sa/audios/107/12--من-حديث-حسابكما-على-الله-تعالى-احدكما-كاذب-لا-سبيل-لك-عليها

21 Oct 2025, 21:45 UTC172 viewsread 11 August 2026

Laten we eens kijken wat de Imams van Soennah hebben gezegd over het woord “Aahir”

16 Oct 2025, 18:52 UTC172 viewsread 11 August 2026

“Hayakallāh akhi, verspreid de volgende uitspraak.” De Shaykh (rechter) velde het oordeel op basis van het woord Aahir, omdat het woord Aahir ‘overspeler’ (fornicator) betekent, op grond van de hadith van de Profeet ﷺ: “En voor de Aahir (de overspeler) is de steniging.” Echter, dit woord is in deze kwestie niet doorslaggevend, omdat er uitspraken zijn die bewijzen dat het woord Aahir ook kan betekenen: • een verdor…

12 Oct 2025, 20:31 UTC148 viewsread 11 August 2026

Laten we de sheikh verdedigen tegen deze twijfel die door de Sa’afiqah wordt verspreid:

12 Oct 2025, 20:28 UTC150 viewsread 11 August 2026

Ik herhaal wat ik in Kashf an-Niqāb heb geschreven over hun principe: “Degene die als rechtschapen en betrouwbaar wordt beschouwd, is degene die aan hun kant staat — ook al behoort hij tot de meest verdorven mensen als het gaat om het eren van anderen. Zoals De moreel verdorvene, de kwaadaardige persoon Abu Ayyub al-Maghrib al-Hollandi. Hij [Abu Ayyub al-Maghrib al-Hollandi is een Moreel corrupte en verdorven persoon…

12 Oct 2025, 20:16 UTC119 viewsread 11 August 2026

Laten we eens kijken wat Sheikh Muhammad Bin Hadi zei over de kwaadaardige Su'fooq Abu Ayoub Al Maghribi en of de Sheikh Qadhf bedoelde

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @saafiqah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Refutation upon the Sa’afiqah” (@saafiqah), 25 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/saafiqah.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.