有单身的需要找工作的吗📍 哈哈哈
❤1

Channel
@s92vip
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
108subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003848273241 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @s92vip |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 6 February 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/s92vip |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:43 | 108 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:59 | 110 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 114 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:32 | 114 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 6 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 6 February 2026 to 24 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
有单身的需要找工作的吗📍 哈哈哈
❤1
🍽 公司年夜饭现场实拍 澳龙上桌,海鲜满席,各种美食安排到位。 不分职位,不分岗位,所有在职员工同等待遇。 在这里,大家不仅是同事,更像一家人。 让每一位在外奋斗的人,都能感受到家的温度。 ——— 📍 我们长期招聘中 ✔️ 包吃住 ✔️ 福利稳定 ✔️ 团队氛围好 ✔️ 真实公司环境 想找工作 / 想换环境 / 想稳定发展 欢迎咨询了解 📩 联系方式 👉 直接私聊:@lailai997 🤖 双向联系:@lailai995BOT
2026年01月05日 从一句私聊开始,到真正站在公司,中间经历了护照临期、柬泰局势变化、假期停招,时间被拉长,计划被打乱,但选择没有变。感谢你在不确定里依然选择相信,也感谢你把信任交给我,更感谢公司这个值得被选择的平台。欢迎加入,这不是结束,而是新的开始。 📩 联系方式 👉 直接私聊:@lailai997 🤖 双向联系:@lailai995BOT 📂点击:查看岗位合集
2026年01月28日 有时候,遗憾不是因为不努力, 而是刚好错过。 有一位求职者想来公司入职。 他一路并不顺利: 一月11号要过来遇见国内误机、拖延,辗转之后终于在1月15日抵达, 却刚好遇上公司停招。 我们让他在外面等了 10 天。 那 10 天里,没有人是轻松的。 在柬埔寨这样的大环境下,公司对于在岗的同事的安全考量,一定是重中之重。 每一个决定,都必须反复权衡, 最终,我们还是选择了停招。 他没能入职,遗憾收场。 遗憾,几乎贯穿了整个过程。 但有些选择,必须有人来承担。 作为 HR, 我愿意为自己的判断买单。 也愿意为求职者的安全负责。 车费、机票报销、住宿安排,签证逾期费用, 以及在你决定回国时,送你安全回国产生的所有费用都会替你报销!感谢你对于公司的坚定选择,但是由于大环境变化,只能让你遗憾的回去,你也说到3月初会再次跟我联系,依然想入职公司。 我们所在的行业,确实是形势所逼; 但我们始终相信—— 短期的…
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @s92vip. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 981,079 of 1,629,571 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ZH集团日常生活” (@s92vip), 108 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/s92vip.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.