5 measurements spanning 9 days, net +26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,494–2,528 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 17:24
2,524
+21
12 Aug 2026, 12:43
2,503
-3
9 Aug 2026, 11:51
2,506
+8
6 Aug 2026, 08:32
2,498
no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:23
2,498
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 22 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
39.7%
avg views ÷ 2,524 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,000
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
12 (22 May 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
3,009
Reactions total
71
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 17s
Average length
1m 39s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
232 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
148
63.8%
❤
46
19.8%
👍
20
8.62%
custom 6325841675675502303
13
5.60%
🎉
5
2.16%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 260reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 12 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @s0ld13r_ch. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 May 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Дампим SAM/SYSTEM через 7-Zip
Знакомая ситуация: вы на машине юзера, нужно достать хеши, но reg save или copy блокируются EDR, файлы заблокированы самой Windows, а антивирус палит известные утилиты.
Но на рабочих станциях часто установлен 7-Zip! И у него есть крутая недокументированная фича - прямое чтение диска (raw disk access).
А можно использовать и для DFIR извлекать MFT и т.д.
Чем проще и банальнее тем …
PentestCode v0.2.4 is out 🤩
Выкатил новую версию PentestCode с несколькими улучшениями, в основном правил мультиагентную архитектуру и жесткость границ между их работой 😺
😱 Что изменилось:
• Добавил полноценный Artifact Store. Теперь PoC, сгенерированные одним саб-агентом, регистрируются в state и переиспользуются другими вместо повторной генерации
• Полностью переделал работу с engagement state. Саб-агенты получ…
Supply-chain атака: EtherHiding C2 во вредоносном форке PentestCode 🕺
Пока просматривал форки своего проекта PentestCode, наткнулся на довольно странные коммиты в одном из них.
⚠️ Сразу отмечу: оригинальный репозиторий PentestCode не был скомпрометирован. Вредоносный код находился исключительно в стороннем форке
Решил разобраться, что именно туда добавили. В итоге обычная проверка форка превратилась в полноценный …
🚨 WP2Shell - критический RCE в WordPress Core
Исследователи опубликовали детали уязвимости WP2Shell, которая позволяет неаутентифицированному атакующему добиться Remote Code Execution (RCE) на уязвимых версиях WordPress 👩💻
📌 Затронутые версии:
• WordPress ниже 6.8.5 - не уязвимы
• WordPress 6.9.0 – 6.9.4 - уязвимы
• WordPress 7.0.0 – 7.0.1 - уязвимы
👀 Что делать?
• Необходимо как можно скорее обновить версию CM…
🛠 Всем привет.
Я тут допилил CLI-движок для LOLCreds на Go. Называется это безобразие CredsHound.
Если коротко, это такая утилита для поиска учетных данных, ключей на хосте, которая работает по концепции Nuclei.
Из коробки она ищет:
- Пароли и API-ключи, забытые в истории терминалов (.bash_history, .zsh_history, ConsoleHost_history.txt).
- Приватные ключи SSH, конфигурации Kubernetes и токены Docker Registry.
- …
LegacyHive: Just another Windows LPE from NightmareEclipse
The PoC requires another standard user credentials and a third username (which can be an administrator account), if the PoC is successful, it will end up mounting the target user hive in current user classes root.
💻 LegacyHive: https://git.projectnightcrawler.dev/NightmareEclipse/LegacyHive
🧢 s0ld13r
🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🅰️🔢❎🔢❎🔢
Выкатил ряд фиксов на PentestCode в релизе 0.2.1 (альфа). В этот раз основной фокус был не на новых фичах, а на том, чтобы сделать агента более стабильным и приблизить его поведение к работе реального пентестера (ну или не очень) 😎
• Улучшена оркестрация и управление субагентами
• Добавлена обязательная just-in-time загрузка скиллов
• Доработан TUI: теперь проще отслеживать активных …
И таааааак сойдет😅
Давно ничего не постил. За это время успел увидеть как все резко стали экспертами по мультиагентным системам, MCP, A2A и еще двадцати новым аббревиатурам которые появляются быстрее чем новые модели у OpenAI ⭕️
Но как бы то ни было, жизнь ироничная штука. В какой-то момент я тоже решил посмотреть, что вообще происходит в мире AI для Offensive Security. Перетестил разные инструменты, поковырял open…
Обнаружены подозрительные домены в зоне home[.]kg 🇰🇬
Домены
- auth.home[.]kg 🇰🇬
- vscode.auth.home[.]kg 🇰🇬
Оба домена присутствуют в Maltrail (apt_kimsuky.txt) и связаны с инфраструктурой, которую OSINT-источники относят к Kimsuky / APT43 / Emerald Sleet.
Текущие резолвы
auth.home[.]kg 🇰🇬
• IP-адрес: 80.68.237.36
• Локация / Провайдер: Польша 🇵🇱
vscode.auth.home[.]kg 🇰🇬
• IP-адрес: 153.75.247.209
• Локация / Пров…
Сделал скромный вклад в IPAHound 🐕
Столкнулся с тем, что оригинальный pyproject.toml конфликтовал с новыми версиями Python 👩💻, из-за чего установка могла ломаться. Подготовил фикс и отправил Merge Request (уже принят), теперь установка должна проходить заметно проще 💃
👩💻 Установка:
curl -LsSf https://astral.sh/uv/install.sh | sh
uv tool install git+https://github.com/IPAHound/IPAHound
😎 Использование:
ipahoun…
Same Tool, Two Hats: AI Velociraptor for Attack and Defense
Всё чаще появляются отчёты об LLM-operated атаках: человек задаёт цель, а LLM помогает вести операцию - выбирает следующий шаг, интерпретирует вывод инструментов и принимает тактические решения.
Этот POC - попытка показать, как такая модель выглядит на практике с реальным DFIR-инструментом.
За основу взят mgreen27/mcp-velociraptor - MCP-обёртка над Veloci…
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @s0ld13r_ch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 211,289 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“s0ld13r ch.” (@s0ld13r_ch), 2,524 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/s0ld13r_ch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.