Channel
@ryanhallyall
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
25subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002355451477 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ryanhallyall |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 15 January 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ryanhallyall |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 25 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 22 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:42 | 22 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 15 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 January 2025 to 1 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Today is a great day to tune into our automated 24/7 weather alert system over on the YallBot channel. If we hit 1k viewers, I'm giving away free gifted channel memberships which will allow you to ask YallBot questions any time! youtube.com/watch?v=0tDeAg…
Things aren’t looking terrible in Hawaii right now, some fluctuation, but no extreme surges so far. Still, stay vigilant. More waves are possible. I've built a real-time, broadcast ready system to model tsunami propagation and track gauge data so we're ready to go live fast when it counts.
The tsunami event is still unfolding across Hawaii and the Pacific. 📍 Midway is still seeing persistent oscillations energy hasn’t let up. 📉 At Hilo, we just saw a sharp drop in water level a classic tsunami signal. 📈 Honolulu continues to show elevated and erratic readings. So far, so good but this confirms: more waves are coming. The threat is active and ongoing.
over 2 ft above normal. Tsunami waves have officially begun impacting Hawaii. More are coming. The red line is the wave front.
Impacts will be felt from the tsunami waves within minutes in Hawaii. Red line is projected initial wave location.
This is what a real tsunami looks like. Over 2 meters of vertical displacement measured at Midway, a huge signal for deep water. Waves like this amplify near shore. Hawaii and other Pacific coasts: this one’s not minor.
TSUNAMI WARNING now issued for parts of Northern California (Del Norte & Humboldt Coasts) following the M8.8 megaquake off Kamchatka. 🌊 Estimated wave arrival: 11:50 PM PDT in Crescent City Significant inundation is possible. Move inland now. This is a confirmed threat.
My system just flagged DART Buoy 21415 (Midway) for tsunami wave activity. 🟠 Detected amplitude: 0.7 ft (22 cm) at 11:23 PM UTC ⚙️ Automated threshold trigger — not an official alert (yet) Signal is clearly moving across the basin.
Tsunami wave activity is now being detected across the Pacific, not just in deep water, but at coastal gauges in Japan too. Hawaii remains under a Tsunami Warning. ⚠️ All shores are at risk 🌊 First wave could hit 7:17 PM HST This is not a drill.
USGS just upgraded it to M8.8 — this is a megaquake.
🚨 TSUNAMI WARNING NOW IN EFFECT for parts of Alaska following the M8.7 Kamchatka quake ✅ Tsunami confirmed 🔴 Warning: Western Aleutians (Samalga Pass to Attu) 🟠 Advisory: Alaska Peninsula, Eastern Aleutians 🟡 Watch: West Coast (CA, OR, WA), BC, SE Alaska Wave arrival times start now for western AK. Do not wait to evacuate if you're in a warning area. #Tsunami #Earthquake #Alaska #Kamchatka #WestCoast
Have y’all never looked at the sky before?
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ryanhallyall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ryanhallyall named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ryan Hall, Y’all” (@ryanhallyall), 25 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ryanhallyall.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.